RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   Guess The Government Isn't Paying Attention to Lennie...??? (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/67566-guess-government-isnt-paying-attention-lennie.html)

bb April 6th 05 12:38 AM


K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:


You make assinine, poorly constructed assertions, then

when
asked
to substantiate them, you wallow around looking for a way out
without
admitting that you don't have an adequate answer.

I don't see anyone wallowing around looking for anything. I

see
you
being your pathetic self.

How do you come up with "pathetic", Brian?


I come up with "pathetic" quite easily. The word handily describes

the
guy who attacks anyone who holds an opinion other than the one you
hold.


There are several people in here with whom I have disagreed

and/or
carried on length discussions at opposite ends of the verbal see-saw.


Prove it.

Only you, Todd, Lennie, and a couple others have huffed up the
tone.


Your singularly distinctive acheivement on RRAP has been "huffing up
the tone." In the past few days you've told at least four new lies.
One lie on top of another just so that you don't have to accept
responsibility for shooting off your mouth about a YL in an amateur
advertisement. I can only wonder what new lie you'll tell tomorrow to
CYA.


K4YZ April 6th 05 07:48 AM


bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:


There are several people in here with whom I have disagreed

and/or
carried on length discussions at opposite ends of the verbal

see-saw.

Prove it.


Ask Jim, N2EY Ask James Hampton, AA2QA or Kim, W5TIT.

Only you, Todd, Lennie, and a couple others have huffed up the
tone.


Your singularly distinctive acheivement on RRAP has been "huffing up
the tone." In the past few days you've told at least four new lies.


You keep saying I've told these lies, yet you've not shown where
I've lied.

One lie on top of another just so that you don't have to accept
responsibility for shooting off your mouth about a YL in an amateur
advertisement. I can only wonder what new lie you'll tell tomorrow

to
CYA.


"CYA"...Very appropriate.

YOU made your own "innuendo" that Phil, K2ASP was somehow being
obligated to pull "two shifts" during an exercise due to a lack of
Amateur volunteers, an assertion you've been asked repeatedly this past
week to substantiate.

I proved with some simple elementary school math that there were
plenty of opportunities to pull "two shifts" in the 96 hour period that
TOPOFF-3 will run.

Your "response" was the above drivvel and dodge. A "non-answer"
answer.

Try again, Brian...

Steve, K4YZ


bb April 7th 05 03:40 AM


K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:


There are several people in here with whom I have disagreed

and/or
carried on length discussions at opposite ends of the verbal

see-saw.

Prove it.


Ask Jim, N2EY Ask James Hampton, AA2QA or Kim, W5TIT.


Ask the anon e-mail "attacker?"


bb April 7th 05 03:43 AM


K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
Phil Kane wrote:
On 3 Apr 2005 17:02:14 -0700, bb wrote:

Phil, why do you have to pull a double-shift?

It's a two-day exercise, and I can make it both days.

I would guess that you have to pull two shifts because there are

not
enough amateur volunteers.

Actually, we have six operators qualified for that location,

and
we
work in teams of three (county voice net, inter-hospital voice

net,
county-wide packet net) so we'll have plenty of operators.


Now c'mon Phil. I used to write duty schedules, so I know how many
times two teams of three fit into a calendar day. Is this a

two-day
ORI?


Always at a deficit for information, aren't you, Brian?


http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/interap...orial_0588.xml

TOPOFF-3 will be four days. More than ample time for any one
person to pull more than one "shift" during the exercise, depending

on
how you're defining "shift".

12 hour shifts: Four (assuming 12 on / 12 off)

8 hour shifts: Six (assuming 8 on / 8 off)

4 hour shifts: Eight (assuming 4 on / 8 off)


Levy your "attack" on Phil. Phil said it was two days, and that he
would be working both days.

Brian...You CAN pull more than two shifts under ONE of those
formats, couldn't you...??? I sure could, and will. CAP is a
participating agency in this.

Steve, K4YZ


Do provide RRAP an after action report of your heroic CAP activities.


K4YZ April 7th 05 03:47 AM


bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:


There are several people in here with whom I have disagreed
and/or
carried on length discussions at opposite ends of the verbal

see-saw.

Prove it.


Ask Jim, N2EY Ask James Hampton, AA2QA or Kim, W5TIT.


Ask the anon e-mail "attacker?"


You've already been provided with specific quotes that disprove
your assertion that I refered to the e-mailer as an "attacker", Brian.

So why do you persist in lying about it?

You also asked me to "prove" that I have had "opposite end" or
disagreements in this forum with others. I did so, but I see you're
weaseling your way around it.

Are these traits you teach your kids? Is snivvelling, lying and
deceit things you teach them to do at home?

Steve, K4YZ


K4YZ April 7th 05 04:06 AM


bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:


TOPOFF-3 will be four days. More than ample time for any one
person to pull more than one "shift" during the exercise, depending

on
how you're defining "shift".

12 hour shifts: Four (assuming 12 on / 12 off)

8 hour shifts: Six (assuming 8 on / 8 off)

4 hour shifts: Eight (assuming 4 on / 8 off)


Levy your "attack" on Phil. Phil said it was two days, and that he
would be working both days.


There was no attack. Either on you, nor especially on Phil.

YOU, however, were the one making the comments about how many
shifts he was pulling-vs-qualified operators to do it.

Brian...You CAN pull more than two shifts under ONE of those
formats, couldn't you...??? I sure could, and will. CAP is a
participating agency in this.

Steve, K4YZ


Do provide RRAP an after action report of your heroic CAP activities.


I don't engage in heroics, Brian. By the book...safe and
responsible. That's how I got through my tour in the USMC with my tail
intact, that's how I have spent 30+ years in CAP without injury, and
that's how I practice Nursing.

Now...about your assertion that ARES can't/won't respond to
emergencies...Are you going to provide some validation of that
statement?

Steve, K4YZ


Kim April 7th 05 12:52 PM

Yep...and in this case, we'd be speaking of both of you--if you'll think
about it. GRIN The only true idiots I've had exchanges with on this
newsgroup are probably true idiots in life also. That would be the idiots
that can't have disagreements and remain fairly human in the process.

By the way, I am shocked that I happened to click on this post among those
that I scrolled this morning. Heck, this "newsgroup" has gone to ****.
Literally. What the Hell are you, Steve, and you, Brian, even doing
engaging these freaks? Do you notice that no one else (well, unless they
are posting under other IDs) of the usual gang is even posting? Where's
everyone gone? OH, and Brian, I didn't even realize "bb" is you. Is that
you, really?

Anyway...yes, Steve and Brian both, we have had disagreements. The part
about being a real human being is recognizing that it takes all kinds, that
all have something constructive to offer, and that if we all agreed with
each other it'd be a damned boring world.

Then, there are the freaks....My favorite worst freak has a name that
reminds me of bread..as in roll. LOL

GRIN

Give the board a rest and let these freaks get outta here...

Kim W5TIT


"bb" wrote in message
oups.com...

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:


There are several people in here with whom I have disagreed
and/or
carried on length discussions at opposite ends of the verbal

see-saw.

Prove it.


Ask Jim, N2EY Ask James Hampton, AA2QA or Kim, W5TIT.


Ask the anon e-mail "attacker?"




K4YZ April 7th 05 05:31 PM

Kim wrote:
"bb" wrote in message
oups.com...

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

There are several people in here with whom I have

disagreed
and/or
carried on length discussions at opposite ends of the verbal
see-saw.

Prove it.

Ask Jim, N2EY Ask James Hampton, AA2QA or Kim, W5TIT.


Ask the anon e-mail "attacker?"


Yep...and in this case, we'd be speaking of both of you--if you'll

think
about it. GRIN


For Brian's benefit: Point made.

The only true idiots I've had exchanges with on this
newsgroup are probably true idiots in life also. That would be the

idiots
that can't have disagreements and remain fairly human in the process.


No doubt.

By the way, I am shocked that I happened to click on this post among

those
that I scrolled this morning. Heck, this "newsgroup" has gone to

****.

It's th usual, Kim...The entrance of Todd Daugherty and his
following of anonymous lying cowards is the worst of it...They usually
get weary after being slapped around with truth, however. They can't
stand being bested.

Literally. What the Hell are you, Steve, and you, Brian, even doing
engaging these freaks? Do you notice that no one else (well, unless

they
are posting under other IDs) of the usual gang is even posting?

Where's
everyone gone? OH, and Brian, I didn't even realize "bb" is you. Is

that
you, really?


Yes...that's Brian. He went gutless and won't sign his name to his
posts. He tried to "disguise" who he was for a while, but just like
Lennie before him, he slipped up one day and "signed" one of his "bb"
posts...Got caught lying and STILL won't own up to it.

Anyway...yes, Steve and Brian both, we have had disagreements. The

part
about being a real human being is recognizing that it takes all

kinds, that
all have something constructive to offer, and that if we all agreed

with
each other it'd be a damned boring world.

Then, there are the freaks....My favorite worst freak has a name that
reminds me of bread..as in roll. LOL


Oh, C'mon now, Kim...You two had a "thing"...!!!! =0

GRIN

Give the board a rest and let these freaks get outta here...


Good idea. Besides, I've been nipping at Brian's heels to own up
to his OTHER assertions, but the little coward won't answer questions
vis-a-vis his OWN assertions.

Sure is a terrible way for a Veteran to be remembered....Skulking
behind (not so) anonymous screen names and not having the intestinal
fortitude to back up his own rhetoric.

88

Steve, K4YZ


K4YZ April 7th 05 06:05 PM

bb wrote:

The importance of amateur radio is easily overblown. The utility of
amateur radio in emergencies is entirely dependent on mostly aging

men,
who may or may not be available to assist in emergencies. For

example,
you have the rickyranger kind of guys who volunteer for ARES, MARS,
Red Cross, CAP, and probably other acronyms that he has yet to reveal
to the group, yet have primary responsibilities as an emergency room
nurse. So when the emergency happens, ARES, MARS and CAP are left
hanging.


Guess these guys in Mississippi didn't get wind of your
assessment, Brain...

QUOTE: (From the ARRL Webpage)

SKYWARN endures daylong siege in Central Mississippi (Apr 7, 2005) --
Wednesday, April 6, in Central Mississippi began with tornadoes, severe
hail and flooding, prompting activation of local SKYWARN, Amateur Radio
Emergency Service (ARES) teams and Amateur Radio volunteers. Members of
the Jackson Amateur Radio Club (JARC) staffed the National Weather
Service (NWS) Jackson Forecast Office.

SNIP TO....

This week's event marked the eighth SKYWARN activation since March 1.
SKYWARN is a voluntary program developed by the NWS to improve its
severe weather warning program.--Ben Jones, AC5SU

UNQUOTE

Facts and evidence contrary to Brian's assertions keep rolling in
and Brian P Burke keeps looking more and more foolish...

Will it ever cease...???

Steve, K4YZ


bb April 7th 05 11:02 PM


K4YZ wrote:
Kim wrote:
"bb" wrote in message
oups.com...

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

There are several people in here with whom I have

disagreed
and/or
carried on length discussions at opposite ends of the

verbal
see-saw.

Prove it.

Ask Jim, N2EY Ask James Hampton, AA2QA or Kim, W5TIT.

Ask the anon e-mail "attacker?"


Yep...and in this case, we'd be speaking of both of you--if you'll

think
about it. GRIN


For Brian's benefit: Point made.


I do my best to avoid the mixed fruit. I did post to one that his
comments about Steve's family were dispicable.

The only true idiots I've had exchanges with on this
newsgroup are probably true idiots in life also. That would be the

idiots
that can't have disagreements and remain fairly human in the

process.

No doubt.

By the way, I am shocked that I happened to click on this post

among
those
that I scrolled this morning. Heck, this "newsgroup" has gone to

****.

It's th usual, Kim...The entrance of Todd Daugherty and his
following of anonymous lying cowards is the worst of it...They

usually
get weary after being slapped around with truth, however. They can't
stand being bested.


Todd is Steve's new sparring buddy. I made an early post to Todd that
his language wouldn't earn him any points here, and then left him
alone. Per usual, Steve cannot NOT reply to him.

Literally. What the Hell are you, Steve, and you, Brian, even

doing
engaging these freaks? Do you notice that no one else (well,

unless
they
are posting under other IDs) of the usual gang is even posting?

Where's
everyone gone? OH, and Brian, I didn't even realize "bb" is you.

Is
that
you, really?


bb is me. I don't engage them, and Steve is as low as I go. I'm still
trying to find some redeeming quality in him, but he's one marine
that's got his head buried in the sand or "SOMEthing." Hi!

Yes...that's Brian. He went gutless and won't sign his name to

his
posts. He tried to "disguise" who he was for a while, but just like
Lennie before him, he slipped up one day and "signed" one of his "bb"
posts...Got caught lying and STILL won't own up to it.


Billy Beeper is bb, in case Steve can't make the connection. The spam
in my regular e-mail account has dropped to almost nothing since using
this throwaway account. Of course, Steve sees something nefarious in
my doing this, yet I have never denied who I am.

Anyway...yes, Steve and Brian both, we have had disagreements. The

part
about being a real human being is recognizing that it takes all

kinds, that
all have something constructive to offer, and that if we all agreed

with
each other it'd be a damned boring world.

Then, there are the freaks....My favorite worst freak has a name

that
reminds me of bread..as in roll. LOL


Oh, C'mon now, Kim...You two had a "thing"...!!!! =0


Not even funny.

GRIN

Give the board a rest and let these freaks get outta here...


Good idea.


Yeh, Steve, good idea. You've single-handedly found them a new home on
rrap. Thanks.

Besides, I've been nipping at Brian's heels to own up
to his OTHER assertions, but the little coward won't answer questions
vis-a-vis his OWN assertions.


Steve set a record for new lies this past week. He questioned a YLs
honor, and then lied about. Then he lied about who objected to it.
Then he lied about lying about it.

Meanwhile he's been shooting his mouth off to some of the rra.misc
freaks. I'm suprised none have taken his advice to put bricks through
windows, slash tires, or terrorize wives. After all, Steve says that's
been know to happen when a person shoots off their mouth. Right now
they're just making vile comments about Steve's family.

Kim, nice hearing from you.

bb



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com