KØHB wrote:

"Michael Coslo" wrote in message
...


No other part of the testing is a skill.


My point EXACTLY, Mike.

While there are many skills associated with our hobby, only one of those skills
is singled out for a required demonstration.

Interestingly, if that skill is so vital as to need a skill demonstration, it
would seem that no-one who had not been tested would be allowed to use it on the
air. Yet a basic Technician licensee is perfectly free to use Morse on the air
without having passed a Morse test. So much for the need for a demonstration
before a license grant!


I see it as a license progression thing. The Morse code is the skill
demonstration, and HF access is the carrot.

I know someone who is going to bust my chops now!!! 8^)


- Mike KB3EIA -

"Michael Coslo" wrote in message
...
KØHB wrote:

"Michael Coslo" wrote in message
...


No other part of the testing is a skill.


My point EXACTLY, Mike.

While there are many skills associated with our hobby, only one of those
skills is singled out for a required demonstration.

Interestingly, if that skill is so vital as to need a skill demonstration, it
would seem that no-one who had not been tested would be allowed to use it on
the air. Yet a basic Technician licensee is perfectly free to use Morse on
the air without having passed a Morse test. So much for the need for a
demonstration before a license grant!


I see it as a license progression thing. The Morse code is the skill
demonstration, and HF access is the carrot.


But the skill demonstration should bear relationship to the privilege granted as
a RESULT of that demonstration. In other words, USE of Morse should be
restricted only to those who have successfully demonstrated their skill. Or to
use your example, the USE of Morse should be the carrot offered as a result of
passing a Morse test.

But by FCC regulation, a code-free Technician is allowed to use Morse on the air
WITHOUT a successful Morse demonstration, and the "demonstrate BEFORE privilege"
model is disconnected; ergo the demonstration is not vital to the successful use
of the mode and serves no rational regulatory purpose.

73, de Hans, K0HB

K=D8HB wrote:
"Michael Coslo" wrote in message
...
K=D8HB wrote:

"Michael Coslo" wrote in message
...


No other part of the testing is a skill.


My point EXACTLY, Mike.

While there are many skills associated with our hobby, only one of
those
skills is singled out for a required demonstration.

Interestingly, if that skill is so vital as to need a skill
demonstration, it
would seem that no-one who had not been tested would be allowed to
use it on
the air. Yet a basic Technician licensee is perfectly free to use
Morse on
the air without having passed a Morse test. So much for the need
for a
demonstration before a license grant!


I see it as a license progression thing. The Morse code is the
skill
demonstration, and HF access is the carrot.


But the skill demonstration should bear relationship to the privilege
granted as
a RESULT of that demonstration. In other words, USE of Morse should
be
restricted only to those who have successfully demonstrated their
skill. Or to
use your example, the USE of Morse should be the carrot offered as a
result of
passing a Morse test.

But by FCC regulation, a code-free Technician is allowed to use Morse
on the air
WITHOUT a successful Morse demonstration, and the "demonstrate BEFORE
privilege"
model is disconnected; ergo the demonstration is not vital to the
successful use
of the mode and serves no rational regulatory purpose.
=20
73, de Hans, K0HB

We deserve logical regulations.

I see it as a license progression thing. The Morse code is the skill
demonstration, and HF access is the carrot.

What does the FCC and the government get out of it today?

I know someone who is going to bust my chops now!!! 8^)

This wouldn't be rrap otherwise ;-)