Ok, Mister Wizard, answer me this question, where in the FCC rules or a
FCC decision does it state that an information bulletin can not be
opinionated??? please quote it from rule or statement from the FCC.

You say I'm in violation of federal law so please enlighten me which
laws am I in violation of?

Todd N9OGL

N9OGL wrote:
Ok, Mister Wizard, answer me this question, where in the FCC rules or
a
FCC decision does it state that an information bulletin can not be
opinionated??? please quote it from rule or statement from the FCC.

You say I'm in violation of federal law so please enlighten me which
laws am I in violation of?

Once you have tainted "information" with individual opinion, it is
no longer information, but editorial.

FCC rules and regulations allow for the transmission of bulletins
of general interest to the Amateur service.

Your "bulletins", made up of YOUR "opinion", do not meet the test
of "general interest.

Read it yourself, Toiddie. You've requoted it over and over
enough.

Steve, K4YZ

Once you have tainted "information" with individual opinion, it is
no longer information, but editorial.

what rule states that???

Todd N9OGL

K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
Ok, Mister Wizard, answer me this question, where in the FCC rules
or
a
FCC decision does it state that an information bulletin can not be
opinionated??? please quote it from rule or statement from the FCC.

You say I'm in violation of federal law so please enlighten me
which
laws am I in violation of?

Once you have tainted "information" with individual opinion, it
is
no longer information, but editorial.

Tell it to Dan Rather.

FCC rules and regulations allow for the transmission of bulletins
of general interest to the Amateur service.

Your "bulletins", made up of YOUR "opinion", do not meet the test
of "general interest.

Explain, with citations.

bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
Ok, Mister Wizard, answer me this question, where in the FCC
rules
or
a
FCC decision does it state that an information bulletin can not
be
opinionated??? please quote it from rule or statement from the
FCC.

You say I'm in violation of federal law so please enlighten me
which
laws am I in violation of?

Once you have tainted "information" with individual opinion, it
is
no longer information, but editorial.

Tell it to Dan Rather.

Oh...You mean the SMAE Dan Rather that's humuiated himself lately
by "going live" with "stories" that were unsubstantiated and patently
false on the face of it?

FCC rules and regulations allow for the transmission of
bulletins
of general interest to the Amateur service.

Your "bulletins", made up of YOUR "opinion", do not meet the
test
of "general interest.

Explain, with citations.

No citation needed. Just spend a semester in a Freshman
journalism class.

Todd can broadcast his "shows" if he cares to, but just like
K1MAN, he gonna have to eventually face the federal music, Brian..
Don't take my word for it...A former FCC communications lawyer said so
himself in this forum.

There ya go.

Steve, K4YZ

Steve,

you have to show me where me and Phil discussed information bulletins
because I saw was me and his discussion on low power FM.

Todd n9ogl

N9OGL wrote:
Steve,

you have to show me where me and Phil discussed information bulletins
because I saw was me and his discussion on low power FM.

Oh NO, Todd....

You mean you WEREN'T PAYING ATTENTION...?!?!

Not, YOU..!!! I am so SHOCKED....(not!)

"...me and Phil..." Didn't discuss anything.

I asked Phil some very specific questions regarding your
alleged "bulletins", and he responded that indeed your actions were not
in compliance with Part 97. He further stated your statements
vis-a-vis made you ineligible for a broadcast license and could casue
your Amateur license to be reviewed before being routinely renewed next
time around...

Assuming, of course, you still HAVE an Amateur license TO
renew....

Steve, K4YZ

N9OGL wrote:

Steve,

you have to show me where me and Phil discussed information bulletins
because I saw was me and his discussion on low power FM.

Todd n9ogl

I see you're back on your meds, I think the dose is a little too high
though.

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
Ok, Mister Wizard, answer me this question, where in the FCC
rules
or
a
FCC decision does it state that an information bulletin can not
be
opinionated??? please quote it from rule or statement from the
FCC.

You say I'm in violation of federal law so please enlighten me
which
laws am I in violation of?

Once you have tainted "information" with individual opinion,
it
is
no longer information, but editorial.

Tell it to Dan Rather.

Oh...You mean the SMAE Dan Rather that's humuiated himself
lately
by "going live" with "stories" that were unsubstantiated and patently
false on the face of it?

FCC rules and regulations allow for the transmission of
bulletins
of general interest to the Amateur service.

Your "bulletins", made up of YOUR "opinion", do not meet the
test
of "general interest.

Explain, with citations.

No citation needed. Just spend a semester in a Freshman
journalism class.

Nope. Too many have done just that to ill effect.

Were all of the ARRL bulletins wrt BPL free of opinion?