"Dee Flint" wrote in message
...


Hans are you saying that Todd may say whatever he wants
whenever where he wants however he wants on the ham
bands?

No, Dee, I didn't say that (and of course you know that I didn't). The hams
bands aren't a right, but a regulated privilege.


Do you believe then that Part 97 is unconstitutional when
it prohibits commericial use and foul language?


No, I don't believe that (and of course you know that I don't). The amateur
bands aren't a right but a regulated privilege.

I do believe, however, that Todd has protections in the Constitution which allow
him to raise those issues here on rrap, just as Steve has protections for his
assertions that parts of the Constitution are not appropriate to his political
views. While I'm disgusted by Todds trashy language here, I am more disgusted
by the overt actions to deny him his Constitutional protections.

73, de Hans, K0HB






..