an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

It's not an "attack" if it's true.

wrong the truth of stement has nothing to do with wether the statement
is an attack

I sure do wish you could have said that in English.

it was an attack and on someone who had not been around in years

You're here. You've "been around" for years.

BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
! ! !

crybaby

Still laughing at you, Wusso.

yes hate or fear

You flatter yourself, Markie.

no it isn't flatering

It is if you think YOU engender fear in ANYone, Markie!

and you can stop distring the quoting anytime too

Huh? Stop what the quoting?

you understand

No, I don't. Too much dreck.

You apnder to and indulge the worst impulses of Soceity

Huh? I what the worst impulses?

you indulge them, and pander to them

Nope.

a simple letter tranposition as you know I make often, and which you
say is all when you do it

"...make often..."...?!?!

T H A T is an UNDERSTATEMENT ! ! !

I said you were dangerous to leave kids around and I explained
why.

wby calling me somekind of olester

I didn't call you a molester.

I dare you to quote, with appropriate headers, where I called you
a molester, Mark.

I D I D say you're dangerous to leave kids around with and
explained why.

The only person using your name and "child molester" in the same
sentences is YOU, Markie...

you just used them both stevie more honest on your part

Only pointing out YOUR humiliation, Markie.

Stop calling yourself a molester. It will only get you worked up.

I HAVE said it's dangerous to leave kids around you, but not
because I think you'd take advantage of them physically. You're a bad
influence. You're functionally illiterate, you are an acknowledged
liar, and a sexual deviant.

not illerate or deviant or a bad influnece, and I am more honest than
you are

That's a lie in and of itself.

nope I am more honest than you

That's a lie in and of itself.

nor Ileterate or deviant

BBBWWWWHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA ! ! ! ! ! !!

"...nor Ileterate..."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! !

I am dysgraphic of course

You're lazy.

Huge snip of Markie Dreck

You can't even adknowledge our status as humans

Are you? Then prove it. Stop lying.

I have the DNA

Not human, you don't.

yes i do more atacks

Yes, I KNOW you do more attacks.

You attack the concept of human decency by trying to include
yourself in it despite your laziness, foulness and indecent behaviour.

You're Hukman, remember...?!?!

typo stupid

Yes, typos make you look stupid.

So why persist?

then you are Claimng FDR was not human Nixon was not Human even JFK
doesn't seem likely to quailify BYS

They didn't claim to be Hukmans, so I take it on faith they were
humans.

thus You support and condone lying

Nope.

I support the concept that the persons you cited were human.

You, on the other hand, are not human, and stated so by your own
hand.

Happy Hukman Day.

Steve, K4YZ