an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

hacking sexual coment

Whcih is to say you "hacked" nothing. There was no "sexual coment"
therein.

"Public dole"..?!?!

Public Dole is the correct phrase, guess you are to dumb to know what
it means, welfare queen is close being a person on the public dole

Who's on welfare? I'm certainly not.

You deny being on disability?

Absolutely.

Whoever suggested that to you lied to you, Markie.

I am a wage earner. More than my fair share of 40 hours a week, I

might add.

UNQUOTE

So, Markie...this makes twice in two weeks that you've accused me
of taking things that I haven't taken.

your quote has nothing to do with the matter years ago you mentioned it
and now you deny it I simply don't beleive you in cahnging your story
again

"cahngubg" THAT story? I've never claimed to be on disability, nor
id I was would I brag about it.

First you alledge that I am receivng public funds for "disability"
allegedging some impropriety.

yes based on your statements in the past and present

Based upon WHAT statements "in the past and present"...???

I've NEVER stated that I am on disability.

your quote supports the impropriety, as in being able to work 40 hours
you clearly should not eleigble

Supports WHAT impropriety?

I am working, ergo do NOT claim ANY "disability".

So from WHAT source did you glean this information?

I have no reason beyond your word that you are not double dipping, as a
point of fact I believe you are...(SNIP)

First of all, you obviously don't know what "double dipping" is.

(You screwed up "drafted", so why should I be surprised?)

"Double dipping", as it applies in COMMON vernacular, is a federal
retiree who completed one career-length period of employment,
"retired", then completes a second career-length period of employment,
thereby securing a second "retirement".

I have not been bringing it up since
then since I don't think it that important, but since you insist I
think you are stealing for the govt monies you are not entitled to

Then you've demonstrated what a COMPLETE idiot you are by making
such a statement without an iota of evidence.

That isn't libel BTW since I clearly state it is my opinion

yes it is, since you allege the perpetration of a felony without
evidence, opinion or not.

Then you claim I am "claiming glory" for a QSO I didn't make when
I clearly stated that I never made the contact from the git-go.

are so you are

Nope.

Where did you get the idea that I am on "the public dole" and why
do you continue to lie in the face of glaring evidence to the
contrary...???

You have presented NO eveidence to the contrary, none at all, Indeed I
don't think you or anyone could present any eveidence in this forum

You're welcome to search my name and DOB on public files in the
State of Tennessee, Markie. The only "hit" you'll find are my driver's
license and Nursing license.

I got the idea form your post of some 6 years ago, and emails you sent
in the same time frame

I have never claimed drawing any disability pay,
Markie...ESPEICALLY in any alleged (ie: never happened) "e-mails".

Once again, you substantiate my claims of your lack of situational
awareness and attention to detail.

It is no lie when I state that I believe you are comitting fraud of
some Govt agency.

And it is no lie on MY part when I state that I believe you need
to be under the supervision of mental health case workers, or at the
very least a reputable vice cop.

wether you are or not is another matter but that I have formed that
opinion is a fact

You've broken new ground here, Markie. Looks like it't time to
have a chat with the folks at Houghton County SO. Someone up there
needs to know about you.

BTW...How did you manage to screw up your address change with the
FCC so badly? Geeze, Markie, how many time do you think it's necessary
to note "PO" box in the address line???

Idiot.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

hacking sexual coment

Whcih is to say you "hacked" nothing. There was no "sexual coment"
therein.

there was and you put it there I choose to cut it and noted that I did
so



"Public dole"..?!?!

Public Dole is the correct phrase, guess you are to dumb to know what
it means, welfare queen is close being a person on the public dole

Who's on welfare? I'm certainly not.

You deny being on disability?

Absolutely.

Whoever suggested that to you lied to you, Markie.

I am a wage earner. More than my fair share of 40 hours a week, I

might add.

UNQUOTE

So, Markie...this makes twice in two weeks that you've accused me
of taking things that I haven't taken.

your quote has nothing to do with the matter years ago you mentioned it
and now you deny it I simply don't beleive you in cahnging your story
again

"cahngubg" THAT story? I've never claimed to be on disability, nor
id I was would I brag about it.

yes you did you were not braging of it but lameting it some 6 years ago
you were using it to counter the argument you should not be picking on
me becuase of my disability


First you alledge that I am receivng public funds for "disability"
allegedging some impropriety.

yes based on your statements in the past and present

Based upon WHAT statements "in the past and present"...??

asked and answered



I've NEVER stated that I am on disability.

you were never that clear but you danced around around it enough to
convince me of it


your quote supports the impropriety, as in being able to work 40 hours
you clearly should not eleigble

Supports WHAT impropriety?

being on disablity and clearly being able to work is improper


I am working, ergo do NOT claim ANY "disability".

one I have only your word you are working, and your word means nothing
to me

two, working does not preclude you from appling for and reciving
disablity or other public aid, only makes improper and/or illegal to do
so


So from WHAT source did you glean this information?

your words of some years ago, you cureent behavior, your clear mental
problems


I have no reason beyond your word that you are not double dipping, as a
point of fact I believe you are...(SNIP)

First of all, you obviously don't know what "double dipping" is.

No I simply don't apply the word as narrowly as you do, as can be
expected since I am less narrow minded than you

more of Stevie trying to pretend he is a binding authority on english
cut

why do you bother with that stevie, I don't accept your "authority"
surely even you are bright enough to notice



I have not been bringing it up since
then since I don't think it that important, but since you insist I
think you are stealing for the govt monies you are not entitled to

Then you've demonstrated what a COMPLETE idiot you are by making
such a statement without an iota of evidence.

merely your statements of 7 years no eveidence there

That isn't libel BTW since I clearly state it is my opinion

yes it is, since you allege the perpetration of a felony without
evidence, opinion or not.

not at all you simply don't know much about law. otherwise the DNC
would be broke about now


Then you claim I am "claiming glory" for a QSO I didn't make when
I clearly stated that I never made the contact from the git-go.

are so you are

Nope.

yes you are


Where did you get the idea that I am on "the public dole" and why
do you continue to lie in the face of glaring evidence to the
contrary...???

You have presented NO eveidence to the contrary, none at all, Indeed I
don't think you or anyone could present any eveidence in this forum

You're welcome to search my name and DOB on public files in the
State of Tennessee, Markie. The only "hit" you'll find are my driver's
license and Nursing license.

anytime you want to present some evidence you go ahead, but again I
have formed my opinion, you wish to prove something you prove it, carry
your own freight you lazy bum

It is statements like the one you just made that help convince me that
you are in fact cheating the system somehow

Even if I preformed the search you sugest it would prove nothing You
could be using a fake name and other id to acomplise this feat Indeed
as I said at some point you can't prove your inocence, it is quite
impossible

I got the idea form your post of some 6 years ago, and emails you sent
in the same time frame

I have never claimed drawing any disability pay,
Markie...ESPEICALLY in any alleged (ie: never happened) "e-mails".

you sent bunches of them harrasing me pleading with me demanding I take
various action trying to black mail with the material you had found out
about my sexual orientation

again the precision with which you making your claim suggest that I
quite close to the truth. that you care so much about what someone who
you claim is of so little import has to say on the subject,

as the old saying goes, "Methinks thou doest protest too much"

Once again, you substantiate my claims of your lack of situational
awareness and attention to detail.

i do nothing of the sort you are merely trying , desperately to cloud
an issue on which you are very likely vulernable


It is no lie when I state that I believe you are comitting fraud of
some Govt agency.

And it is no lie on MY part when I state that I believe you need
to be under the supervision of mental health case workers, or at the
very least a reputable vice cop.

I accept that is a true statement

However it also shows your lack of mental balance

nothing you accuse me off merits any attention form a Vice cop and I
suffer from no mental illness as determined by licensed pros


wether you are or not is another matter but that I have formed that
opinion is a fact

You've broken new ground here, Markie. Looks like it't time to
have a chat with the folks at Houghton County SO. Someone up there
needs to know about you.

not at all, no new ground at all, not even your threats are new I have
stated my opinions on you quite clearly in the past


BTW...How did you manage to screw up your address change with the
FCC so badly? Geeze, Markie, how many time do you think it's necessary
to note "PO" box in the address line???

more proof of your stalking

as if more were needed


Idiot.

Steve, K4YZ

"an_old_friend" wrote


two, working does not preclude you from appling for and reciving
disablity or other public aid, only makes improper and/or illegal to do
so


A former employee of mine (now retired) lost an arm in Vietnam, and receives
compensation for his disability. He built a fine career as an electronics design
engineer. What is improper or illegal about that? You owe a lot of disabled
veterans a huge apology for suggesting that succeeding in life is "improper
and/or illegal".

Hans

K=D8HB wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote


two, working does not preclude you from appling for and reciving
disablity or other public aid, only makes improper and/or illegal to do
so


A former employee of mine (now retired) lost an arm in Vietnam, and recei=
ves
compensation for his disability. He built a fine career as an electronics=
design
engineer. What is improper or illegal about that? You owe a lot of disa=
bled
veterans a huge apology for suggesting that succeeding in life is "improp=
er
and/or illegal".

you disort my mean sir and you have removed the stement from context

Stevie claims that him working proves he is not receiveing disabilty

stevie also claims that he is not disabled

therefore if stevie is to be believed then it is improper for STEVIE"
to receive benifits

you took a very spesific case and tried to broaden it

Improperly I might add

as you did with NCI's postition on the One time upgrades

=20
Hans

"an_old_friend" wrote

you disort my mean sir and you have removed the stement from context

I didn't distort your statement at all, but quoted it completely and verbatim.

Then I proved it false.

Deal with that.

73, de Hans, K0HB

K=D8HB wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote

you disort my mean sir and you have removed the stement from context

I didn't distort your statement at all, but quoted it completely and verb=
atim.

now you are plain flat out lying

and like Stevie you cut again the stement you claim to have quoted

Then I proved it false.

you demolised a straw man of your own making

=20
Deal with that.

as will you


=20
73, de Hans, K0HB

"an_old_friend" wrote

now you are plain flat out lying

My quote was an exact verbatim copy of your statement. If it was a lie, then
it's only because I repeated your lie.

73, de Hans, K0HB

an_old_friend wrote:
K=D8HB wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote

you disort my mean sir and you have removed the stement from context

I didn't distort your statement at all, but quoted it completely and ve=
rbatim.

now you are plain flat out lying

Nope.

There you go making more accusations that are so readily proven
false, Markie.

Hans quoted every word you wrote.

and like Stevie you cut again the stement you claim to have quoted

Then I proved it false.

you demolised a straw man of your own making

What "straw man"...?!?!

There you go quoting Lennie again, and like your OTHER uses of
"definitions" for which you have no idea what they mean, you screwed
this up too.

Deal with that.

as will you

He DID "deal with it"...

Made you look like an even BIGGER fool than you already are...as
if THAT were possible, but he did!

Your foolishness is just like a bowl of Jell-O..."There's Always
Room For More!"

Steve, K4YZ

From: "K0HB" on Thurs 28 Jul 2005 14:50


"an_old_friend" wrote

two, working does not preclude you from appling for and reciving
disablity or other public aid, only makes improper and/or illegal to do
so

A former employee of mine (now retired) lost an arm in Vietnam, and receives
compensation for his disability. He built a fine career as an electronics design
engineer. What is improper or illegal about that?

There's NOTHING "improper or illegal" about that. In fact, this
individual WAS NOT MENTIONED in anyone's text or context!

Now you are putting on the Grand Champion cload of MORAL ARBITER
and trying to strike down someone who NEVER MENTIONED your "former
employee."

I'm just going to keep your little "moral lesson" in mind the
next time I spot any of your mentions of someone's alleged
moral impropriety, super chief. I know lots of people that I've
never mentioned in here...the next time there's a HINT of
possible "INSULT TO THEM" I will demand YOU apologize to THEM!

You owe a lot of disabled
veterans a huge apology for suggesting that succeeding in life is "improper
and/or illegal".

Have you been dipping into the rum barrel again, super chief?

NOBODY "OWES" ANY "APOLOGIES" FOR NOT KNOWING EVERYONE THAT
YOU KNOW AND NOT MENTIONED IN HERE YET.

But, you MISSED someone HERE who goes by the initials SJR...a
mighty warrior, been in "seven hostile actions," will "always
be a marine," and claimed BOTH a medical discharge AND a
disability pension. Yes, "disabled" so much that he received
U.S. money so that he could fly a private aircraft, engage in
rollerblading, engage in hang-gliding, go on weight-packing
"marches" and do all sorts of glorious physical feats of might.

Hello? DISABLED? MEDICAL DISCHARGE (that suddenly turned into
an "Honorable" as if by magic)? EXTRA DISABILITY INCOME (that
he "needs")? Yah, yah, all dat and more...

On top of that, a demonstrated sociopathic liar (repeated) who
has never "apologized" for anydamnthing he wrote, who can't
ever accept that anyone else has ever challenged him in anything.

By golly, I'm just so glad you are supporting (encouraging?)
such an individual...makes it EASY to NOT bother entering
amateur radio through federally-authorized licensing...like who
would WANT to associate with such as SJR?

Keep up the one-sided Moral Arbiter role. Do it enough and you
will have college credits towards an MA in BS.

With all bestest of possible regards,

bat bot

Markie Morgan said: " Stevie lies and deciets"

FYI, Markie: "deceit"

wrote:
From: "K0HB" on Thurs 28 Jul 2005 14:50

You owe a lot of disabled
veterans a huge apology for suggesting that succeeding in life is "improper
and/or illegal".

Have you been dipping into the rum barrel again, super chief?

NOBODY "OWES" ANY "APOLOGIES" FOR NOT KNOWING EVERYONE THAT
YOU KNOW AND NOT MENTIONED IN HERE YET.

But, you MISSED someone HERE who goes by the initials SJR...a
mighty warrior, been in "seven hostile actions," will "always
be a marine," and claimed BOTH a medical discharge AND a
disability pension. Yes, "disabled" so much that he received
U.S. money so that he could fly a private aircraft, engage in
rollerblading, engage in hang-gliding, go on weight-packing
"marches" and do all sorts of glorious physical feats of might.

Lennie, Lennie, Lennie....

Lies, lies and more lies.

I'd ask you to substantiate it, but you can't even make good on
your own promises, you will have too dig deep to find THOSE assertions
(deep as into your imagination...they didn't happen here...)

Hello? DISABLED? MEDICAL DISCHARGE (that suddenly turned into
an "Honorable" as if by magic)? EXTRA DISABILITY INCOME (that
he "needs")? Yah, yah, all dat and more...

Wondering where you came up with all of that, Lennie.

You're trying to put all the big peices together with .060 thread
and wondering why your stories don't hold water...

On top of that, a demonstrated sociopathic liar (repeated) who
has never "apologized" for anydamnthing he wrote, who can't
ever accept that anyone else has ever challenged him in anything.

Now why would you suddenly change the subject from me to you,
Lennie?

Just can't stand anyone else being in the spotlight for a minute,
can you?

By golly, I'm just so glad you are supporting (encouraging?)
such an individual...makes it EASY to NOT bother entering
amateur radio through federally-authorized licensing...like who
would WANT to associate with such as SJR?

Uh...675,000 other Americans.

Thankfully none of them are "you", Lennie...