Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: hacking sexual coment Whcih is to say you "hacked" nothing. There was no "sexual coment" therein. there was and you put it there I choose to cut it and noted that I did so "Public dole"..?!?! Public Dole is the correct phrase, guess you are to dumb to know what it means, welfare queen is close being a person on the public dole Who's on welfare? I'm certainly not. You deny being on disability? Absolutely. Whoever suggested that to you lied to you, Markie. I am a wage earner. More than my fair share of 40 hours a week, I might add. UNQUOTE So, Markie...this makes twice in two weeks that you've accused me of taking things that I haven't taken. your quote has nothing to do with the matter years ago you mentioned it and now you deny it I simply don't beleive you in cahnging your story again "cahngubg" THAT story? I've never claimed to be on disability, nor id I was would I brag about it. yes you did you were not braging of it but lameting it some 6 years ago you were using it to counter the argument you should not be picking on me becuase of my disability First you alledge that I am receivng public funds for "disability" allegedging some impropriety. yes based on your statements in the past and present Based upon WHAT statements "in the past and present"...?? asked and answered I've NEVER stated that I am on disability. you were never that clear but you danced around around it enough to convince me of it your quote supports the impropriety, as in being able to work 40 hours you clearly should not eleigble Supports WHAT impropriety? being on disablity and clearly being able to work is improper I am working, ergo do NOT claim ANY "disability". one I have only your word you are working, and your word means nothing to me two, working does not preclude you from appling for and reciving disablity or other public aid, only makes improper and/or illegal to do so So from WHAT source did you glean this information? your words of some years ago, you cureent behavior, your clear mental problems I have no reason beyond your word that you are not double dipping, as a point of fact I believe you are...(SNIP) First of all, you obviously don't know what "double dipping" is. No I simply don't apply the word as narrowly as you do, as can be expected since I am less narrow minded than you more of Stevie trying to pretend he is a binding authority on english cut why do you bother with that stevie, I don't accept your "authority" surely even you are bright enough to notice I have not been bringing it up since then since I don't think it that important, but since you insist I think you are stealing for the govt monies you are not entitled to Then you've demonstrated what a COMPLETE idiot you are by making such a statement without an iota of evidence. merely your statements of 7 years no eveidence there That isn't libel BTW since I clearly state it is my opinion yes it is, since you allege the perpetration of a felony without evidence, opinion or not. not at all you simply don't know much about law. otherwise the DNC would be broke about now Then you claim I am "claiming glory" for a QSO I didn't make when I clearly stated that I never made the contact from the git-go. are so you are Nope. yes you are Where did you get the idea that I am on "the public dole" and why do you continue to lie in the face of glaring evidence to the contrary...??? You have presented NO eveidence to the contrary, none at all, Indeed I don't think you or anyone could present any eveidence in this forum You're welcome to search my name and DOB on public files in the State of Tennessee, Markie. The only "hit" you'll find are my driver's license and Nursing license. anytime you want to present some evidence you go ahead, but again I have formed my opinion, you wish to prove something you prove it, carry your own freight you lazy bum It is statements like the one you just made that help convince me that you are in fact cheating the system somehow Even if I preformed the search you sugest it would prove nothing You could be using a fake name and other id to acomplise this feat Indeed as I said at some point you can't prove your inocence, it is quite impossible I got the idea form your post of some 6 years ago, and emails you sent in the same time frame I have never claimed drawing any disability pay, Markie...ESPEICALLY in any alleged (ie: never happened) "e-mails". you sent bunches of them harrasing me pleading with me demanding I take various action trying to black mail with the material you had found out about my sexual orientation again the precision with which you making your claim suggest that I quite close to the truth. that you care so much about what someone who you claim is of so little import has to say on the subject, as the old saying goes, "Methinks thou doest protest too much" Once again, you substantiate my claims of your lack of situational awareness and attention to detail. i do nothing of the sort you are merely trying , desperately to cloud an issue on which you are very likely vulernable It is no lie when I state that I believe you are comitting fraud of some Govt agency. And it is no lie on MY part when I state that I believe you need to be under the supervision of mental health case workers, or at the very least a reputable vice cop. I accept that is a true statement However it also shows your lack of mental balance nothing you accuse me off merits any attention form a Vice cop and I suffer from no mental illness as determined by licensed pros wether you are or not is another matter but that I have formed that opinion is a fact You've broken new ground here, Markie. Looks like it't time to have a chat with the folks at Houghton County SO. Someone up there needs to know about you. not at all, no new ground at all, not even your threats are new I have stated my opinions on you quite clearly in the past BTW...How did you manage to screw up your address change with the FCC so badly? Geeze, Markie, how many time do you think it's necessary to note "PO" box in the address line??? more proof of your stalking as if more were needed Idiot. Steve, K4YZ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"an_old_friend" wrote two, working does not preclude you from appling for and reciving disablity or other public aid, only makes improper and/or illegal to do so A former employee of mine (now retired) lost an arm in Vietnam, and receives compensation for his disability. He built a fine career as an electronics design engineer. What is improper or illegal about that? You owe a lot of disabled veterans a huge apology for suggesting that succeeding in life is "improper and/or illegal". Hans |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
K=D8HB wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote two, working does not preclude you from appling for and reciving disablity or other public aid, only makes improper and/or illegal to do so A former employee of mine (now retired) lost an arm in Vietnam, and recei= ves compensation for his disability. He built a fine career as an electronics= design engineer. What is improper or illegal about that? You owe a lot of disa= bled veterans a huge apology for suggesting that succeeding in life is "improp= er and/or illegal". you disort my mean sir and you have removed the stement from context Stevie claims that him working proves he is not receiveing disabilty stevie also claims that he is not disabled therefore if stevie is to be believed then it is improper for STEVIE" to receive benifits you took a very spesific case and tried to broaden it Improperly I might add as you did with NCI's postition on the One time upgrades =20 Hans |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"an_old_friend" wrote you disort my mean sir and you have removed the stement from context I didn't distort your statement at all, but quoted it completely and verbatim. Then I proved it false. Deal with that. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
K=D8HB wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote you disort my mean sir and you have removed the stement from context I didn't distort your statement at all, but quoted it completely and verb= atim. now you are plain flat out lying and like Stevie you cut again the stement you claim to have quoted Then I proved it false. you demolised a straw man of your own making =20 Deal with that. as will you =20 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"an_old_friend" wrote now you are plain flat out lying My quote was an exact verbatim copy of your statement. If it was a lie, then it's only because I repeated your lie. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
K=D8HB wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote now you are plain flat out lying My quote was an exact verbatim copy of your statement. If it was a lie, = then it's only because I repeated your lie. nope at all you quote a couple of line out of several pages you statement that it is a completle cverbatim quote is simply a lie =20 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
an_old_friend wrote: K=D8HB wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote you disort my mean sir and you have removed the stement from context I didn't distort your statement at all, but quoted it completely and ve= rbatim. now you are plain flat out lying Nope. There you go making more accusations that are so readily proven false, Markie. Hans quoted every word you wrote. and like Stevie you cut again the stement you claim to have quoted Then I proved it false. you demolised a straw man of your own making What "straw man"...?!?! There you go quoting Lennie again, and like your OTHER uses of "definitions" for which you have no idea what they mean, you screwed this up too. Deal with that. as will you He DID "deal with it"... Made you look like an even BIGGER fool than you already are...as if THAT were possible, but he did! Your foolishness is just like a bowl of Jell-O..."There's Always Room For More!" Steve, K4YZ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K=D8HB wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote you disort my mean sir and you have removed the stement from context I didn't distort your statement at all, but quoted it completely and = verbatim. now you are plain flat out lying Nope. There you go making more accusations that are so readily proven false, Markie. that at all Hans quoted every word you wrote. a lie on both of parts and like Stevie you cut again the stement you claim to have quoted Then I proved it false. you demolised a straw man of your own making What "straw man"...?!?! which straw men you mean you add stuff to any statement There you go quoting Lennie again, and like your OTHER uses of "definitions" for which you have no idea what they mean, you screwed this up too. not at all. It is not my fault or lens that you mind is so limited Deal with that. as will you He DID "deal with it"... by making another bald faced lie Made you look like an even BIGGER fool than you already are...as if THAT were possible, but he did! Your foolishness is just like a bowl of Jell-O..."There's Always Room For More!" =20 Steve, K4YZ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
From: "K0HB" on Thurs 28 Jul 2005 14:50
"an_old_friend" wrote two, working does not preclude you from appling for and reciving disablity or other public aid, only makes improper and/or illegal to do so A former employee of mine (now retired) lost an arm in Vietnam, and receives compensation for his disability. He built a fine career as an electronics design engineer. What is improper or illegal about that? There's NOTHING "improper or illegal" about that. In fact, this individual WAS NOT MENTIONED in anyone's text or context! Now you are putting on the Grand Champion cload of MORAL ARBITER and trying to strike down someone who NEVER MENTIONED your "former employee." I'm just going to keep your little "moral lesson" in mind the next time I spot any of your mentions of someone's alleged moral impropriety, super chief. I know lots of people that I've never mentioned in here...the next time there's a HINT of possible "INSULT TO THEM" I will demand YOU apologize to THEM! You owe a lot of disabled veterans a huge apology for suggesting that succeeding in life is "improper and/or illegal". Have you been dipping into the rum barrel again, super chief? NOBODY "OWES" ANY "APOLOGIES" FOR NOT KNOWING EVERYONE THAT YOU KNOW AND NOT MENTIONED IN HERE YET. But, you MISSED someone HERE who goes by the initials SJR...a mighty warrior, been in "seven hostile actions," will "always be a marine," and claimed BOTH a medical discharge AND a disability pension. Yes, "disabled" so much that he received U.S. money so that he could fly a private aircraft, engage in rollerblading, engage in hang-gliding, go on weight-packing "marches" and do all sorts of glorious physical feats of might. Hello? DISABLED? MEDICAL DISCHARGE (that suddenly turned into an "Honorable" as if by magic)? EXTRA DISABILITY INCOME (that he "needs")? Yah, yah, all dat and more... On top of that, a demonstrated sociopathic liar (repeated) who has never "apologized" for anydamnthing he wrote, who can't ever accept that anyone else has ever challenged him in anything. By golly, I'm just so glad you are supporting (encouraging?) such an individual...makes it EASY to NOT bother entering amateur radio through federally-authorized licensing...like who would WANT to associate with such as SJR? Keep up the one-sided Moral Arbiter role. Do it enough and you will have college credits towards an MA in BS. With all bestest of possible regards, bat bot |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More Muddled Markie Mularkie to Mess With Mature Men's Minds | Policy | |||
Thousands of Overseas Chinese Consulates Workers Waiting to Escape | Shortwave | |||
Waiting For Another Answer From Lennie | Policy | |||
Too funny waiting Isabel | Dx | |||
Too funny waiting Isabel | Dx |