Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"an_old_friend" wrote two, working does not preclude you from appling for and reciving disablity or other public aid, only makes improper and/or illegal to do so A former employee of mine (now retired) lost an arm in Vietnam, and receives compensation for his disability. He built a fine career as an electronics design engineer. What is improper or illegal about that? You owe a lot of disabled veterans a huge apology for suggesting that succeeding in life is "improper and/or illegal". Hans |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
K=D8HB wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote two, working does not preclude you from appling for and reciving disablity or other public aid, only makes improper and/or illegal to do so A former employee of mine (now retired) lost an arm in Vietnam, and recei= ves compensation for his disability. He built a fine career as an electronics= design engineer. What is improper or illegal about that? You owe a lot of disa= bled veterans a huge apology for suggesting that succeeding in life is "improp= er and/or illegal". you disort my mean sir and you have removed the stement from context Stevie claims that him working proves he is not receiveing disabilty stevie also claims that he is not disabled therefore if stevie is to be believed then it is improper for STEVIE" to receive benifits you took a very spesific case and tried to broaden it Improperly I might add as you did with NCI's postition on the One time upgrades =20 Hans |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"an_old_friend" wrote you disort my mean sir and you have removed the stement from context I didn't distort your statement at all, but quoted it completely and verbatim. Then I proved it false. Deal with that. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
K=D8HB wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote you disort my mean sir and you have removed the stement from context I didn't distort your statement at all, but quoted it completely and verb= atim. now you are plain flat out lying and like Stevie you cut again the stement you claim to have quoted Then I proved it false. you demolised a straw man of your own making =20 Deal with that. as will you =20 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"an_old_friend" wrote now you are plain flat out lying My quote was an exact verbatim copy of your statement. If it was a lie, then it's only because I repeated your lie. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
K=D8HB wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote now you are plain flat out lying My quote was an exact verbatim copy of your statement. If it was a lie, = then it's only because I repeated your lie. nope at all you quote a couple of line out of several pages you statement that it is a completle cverbatim quote is simply a lie =20 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
an_old_friend wrote: K=D8HB wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote you disort my mean sir and you have removed the stement from context I didn't distort your statement at all, but quoted it completely and ve= rbatim. now you are plain flat out lying Nope. There you go making more accusations that are so readily proven false, Markie. Hans quoted every word you wrote. and like Stevie you cut again the stement you claim to have quoted Then I proved it false. you demolised a straw man of your own making What "straw man"...?!?! There you go quoting Lennie again, and like your OTHER uses of "definitions" for which you have no idea what they mean, you screwed this up too. Deal with that. as will you He DID "deal with it"... Made you look like an even BIGGER fool than you already are...as if THAT were possible, but he did! Your foolishness is just like a bowl of Jell-O..."There's Always Room For More!" Steve, K4YZ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K=D8HB wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote you disort my mean sir and you have removed the stement from context I didn't distort your statement at all, but quoted it completely and = verbatim. now you are plain flat out lying Nope. There you go making more accusations that are so readily proven false, Markie. that at all Hans quoted every word you wrote. a lie on both of parts and like Stevie you cut again the stement you claim to have quoted Then I proved it false. you demolised a straw man of your own making What "straw man"...?!?! which straw men you mean you add stuff to any statement There you go quoting Lennie again, and like your OTHER uses of "definitions" for which you have no idea what they mean, you screwed this up too. not at all. It is not my fault or lens that you mind is so limited Deal with that. as will you He DID "deal with it"... by making another bald faced lie Made you look like an even BIGGER fool than you already are...as if THAT were possible, but he did! Your foolishness is just like a bowl of Jell-O..."There's Always Room For More!" =20 Steve, K4YZ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K=D8HB wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote you disort my mean sir and you have removed the stement from cont= ext I didn't distort your statement at all, but quoted it completely an= d verbatim. now you are plain flat out lying Nope. There you go making more accusations that are so readily proven false, Markie. that at all "...that at all"... What was that? It wasn't a sentence. Hans quoted every word you wrote. a lie on both of parts No, it wasn't. and like Stevie you cut again the stement you claim to have quoted Then I proved it false. you demolised a straw man of your own making What "straw man"...?!?! which straw men you mean Well here we go again, LiarBoy. YOU said..."you demolised a straw man..." Singular. As in "just one"... "men" is plural. you add stuff to any statement Nope. You do. Re-read what I just wrote, quoting YOU word-for-word. There you go quoting Lennie again, and like your OTHER uses of "definitions" for which you have no idea what they mean, you screwed this up too. not at all. It is not my fault or lens that you mind is so limited There's a limited mind here, alright, but it's not mine, LiarBoy. Deal with that. as will you He DID "deal with it"... by making another bald faced lie Nope. Every word of it true. Made you look like an even BIGGER fool than you already are...as if THAT were possible, but he did! Your foolishness is just like a bowl of Jell-O..."There's Always Room For More!" As I said, and you PROVED it for me AGAIN. Steve, K4YZ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
From: "K0HB" on Thurs 28 Jul 2005 14:50
"an_old_friend" wrote two, working does not preclude you from appling for and reciving disablity or other public aid, only makes improper and/or illegal to do so A former employee of mine (now retired) lost an arm in Vietnam, and receives compensation for his disability. He built a fine career as an electronics design engineer. What is improper or illegal about that? There's NOTHING "improper or illegal" about that. In fact, this individual WAS NOT MENTIONED in anyone's text or context! Now you are putting on the Grand Champion cload of MORAL ARBITER and trying to strike down someone who NEVER MENTIONED your "former employee." I'm just going to keep your little "moral lesson" in mind the next time I spot any of your mentions of someone's alleged moral impropriety, super chief. I know lots of people that I've never mentioned in here...the next time there's a HINT of possible "INSULT TO THEM" I will demand YOU apologize to THEM! You owe a lot of disabled veterans a huge apology for suggesting that succeeding in life is "improper and/or illegal". Have you been dipping into the rum barrel again, super chief? NOBODY "OWES" ANY "APOLOGIES" FOR NOT KNOWING EVERYONE THAT YOU KNOW AND NOT MENTIONED IN HERE YET. But, you MISSED someone HERE who goes by the initials SJR...a mighty warrior, been in "seven hostile actions," will "always be a marine," and claimed BOTH a medical discharge AND a disability pension. Yes, "disabled" so much that he received U.S. money so that he could fly a private aircraft, engage in rollerblading, engage in hang-gliding, go on weight-packing "marches" and do all sorts of glorious physical feats of might. Hello? DISABLED? MEDICAL DISCHARGE (that suddenly turned into an "Honorable" as if by magic)? EXTRA DISABILITY INCOME (that he "needs")? Yah, yah, all dat and more... On top of that, a demonstrated sociopathic liar (repeated) who has never "apologized" for anydamnthing he wrote, who can't ever accept that anyone else has ever challenged him in anything. By golly, I'm just so glad you are supporting (encouraging?) such an individual...makes it EASY to NOT bother entering amateur radio through federally-authorized licensing...like who would WANT to associate with such as SJR? Keep up the one-sided Moral Arbiter role. Do it enough and you will have college credits towards an MA in BS. With all bestest of possible regards, bat bot |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
More Muddled Markie Mularkie to Mess With Mature Men's Minds | Policy | |||
Thousands of Overseas Chinese Consulates Workers Waiting to Escape | Shortwave | |||
Waiting For Another Answer From Lennie | Policy | |||
Too funny waiting Isabel | Dx | |||
Too funny waiting Isabel | Dx |