Steveo wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote:
I wonder why it is that all of the "supporters" that Brain and
Markie can manage are "anonies"...?!?!

Steve, K4YZ

What's "anonie" about Frank Gilliland?

Just curious that the only "Frank Gilliland" I can find in FCC
files had his license expire over 2 years ago.

Unless it's a middle name or someone forgot to drop a new 610
(605)?

Steve, K4YZ

"K4YZ" wrote:
Steveo wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote:
I wonder why it is that all of the "supporters" that Brain and
Markie can manage are "anonies"...?!?!

Steve, K4YZ

What's "anonie" about Frank Gilliland?

Just curious that the only "Frank Gilliland" I can find in FCC
files had his license expire over 2 years ago.

Unless it's a middle name or someone forgot to drop a new 610
(605)?

Steve, K4YZ

Who said Frank is in the FCC database? As far as I know he's not a ham
radio operator. That doesn't make him "anonie", does it?

--
http://NewsReader.Com/

On 15 Aug 2005 15:44:34 GMT, Steveo wrote in
:

"K4YZ" wrote:
Steveo wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote:
I wonder why it is that all of the "supporters" that Brain and
Markie can manage are "anonies"...?!?!

Steve, K4YZ

What's "anonie" about Frank Gilliland?

Just curious that the only "Frank Gilliland" I can find in FCC
files had his license expire over 2 years ago.

Unless it's a middle name or someone forgot to drop a new 610
(605)?

Steve, K4YZ

Who said Frank is in the FCC database? As far as I know he's not a ham
radio operator. That doesn't make him "anonie", does it?


Typical hammie attitude -- if you're not a ham you're nobody.






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 15 Aug 2005 15:44:34 GMT, Steveo wrote in
:


"K4YZ" wrote:

Steveo wrote:

"K4YZ" wrote:

I wonder why it is that all of the "supporters" that Brain and
Markie can manage are "anonies"...?!?!

Steve, K4YZ


What's "anonie" about Frank Gilliland?

Just curious that the only "Frank Gilliland" I can find in FCC
files had his license expire over 2 years ago.

Unless it's a middle name or someone forgot to drop a new 610
(605)?

Steve, K4YZ


Who said Frank is in the FCC database? As far as I know he's not a ham
radio operator. That doesn't make him "anonie", does it?



Typical hammie attitude -- if you're not a ham you're nobody.

I think you have it wrong, Frank. I believe the typical ham attitude
is: If you aren't a ham and persist in posting material about the
wonders of CB radio in an amateur radio group, *then* you're nobody.

Dave K8MN

On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:27:48 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in et:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
snip
Typical hammie attitude -- if you're not a ham you're nobody.

I think you have it wrong, Frank.


Oh really.....


I believe the typical ham attitude
is: If you aren't a ham and persist in posting material about the
wonders of CB radio in an amateur radio group, *then* you're nobody.


That's one of the difference between holy-hammies and CBers; the
holy-hammies begin their statements with "I believe....." while the
CBers start with "The facts are.....".

And the facts are that his discussion began in -this- newsgroup with
the thread "Emergency communications", where some CB-hating hams
crossposted their highly subjective and speculative opinions to rrcb.
I'm just here to set the record straight. If you don't want CBers in
this newsgroup then quit crossposting your anti-CB garbage.








----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:27:48 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in et:


Frank Gilliland wrote:

snip

Typical hammie attitude -- if you're not a ham you're nobody.

I think you have it wrong, Frank.



Oh really.....

Yep, really.



I believe the typical ham attitude
is: If you aren't a ham and persist in posting material about the
wonders of CB radio in an amateur radio group, *then* you're nobody.



That's one of the difference between holy-hammies and CBers; the
holy-hammies begin their statements with "I believe....." while the
CBers start with "The facts are.....".

You're right. I've heard 'em do it--whether they have facts or not.

And the facts are that his discussion began in -this- newsgroup with
the thread "Emergency communications", where some CB-hating hams
crossposted their highly subjective and speculative opinions to rrcb.
I'm just here to set the record straight. If you don't want CBers in
this newsgroup then quit crossposting your anti-CB garbage.

That's funny. I checked to see if your post had gone to other groups
before I responded. This was the only newsgroup indicated. There goes
your perfectly good rant.

Dave K8MN

On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:49:58 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in et:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:27:48 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in et:


Frank Gilliland wrote:

snip

Typical hammie attitude -- if you're not a ham you're nobody.

I think you have it wrong, Frank.



Oh really.....

Yep, really.



I believe the typical ham attitude
is: If you aren't a ham and persist in posting material about the
wonders of CB radio in an amateur radio group, *then* you're nobody.



That's one of the difference between holy-hammies and CBers; the
holy-hammies begin their statements with "I believe....." while the
CBers start with "The facts are.....".

You're right. I've heard 'em do it--whether they have facts or not.

And the facts are that his discussion began in -this- newsgroup with
the thread "Emergency communications", where some CB-hating hams
crossposted their highly subjective and speculative opinions to rrcb.
I'm just here to set the record straight. If you don't want CBers in
this newsgroup then quit crossposting your anti-CB garbage.

That's funny. I checked to see if your post had gone to other groups
before I responded. This was the only newsgroup indicated. There goes
your perfectly good rant.


You proved my point nicely. Thanks!







----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Frank Gilliland wrote:


Typical hammie attitude -- if you're not a ham you're nobody.

And being a cber makes you even less than that.

Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote:
Frank Gilliland wrote:


Typical hammie attitude -- if you're not a ham you're nobody.

And being a cber makes you even less than that.

You're a CB'er too, call-less camd buzz/jj/corey, or whatever you call
yourself this month.

According to Steve, K4YZ, you're an "anonie" too.

What's your call, camd buzz/jj/corey?

--
http://NewsReader.Com/

Steveo wrote:

You're a CB'er too, call-less camd buzz/jj/corey, or whatever you call
yourself this month.


Hate to dissappoint you steveo, but I have never operated a cb radio or
any other radio on the cb band.