Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Just why would there need to be a test in order to use this specturm
set aside One can either USE Morse Code or not But still the plea that Morse Code needs welfare in order to endure David Stinson wrote: Comments submitted to the FCC, advocating ARRL administration of Morse license endorsment: ------------------- 18 Aug. 2005 WT Docket 05-235, Amateur Radio Morse Code Testing Requirement. cuting to save BW |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
an_old_friend wrote:
Just why would there need to be a test in order to use this specturm set aside One can either USE Morse Code or not But still the plea that Morse Code needs welfare in order to endure Yes, just as the U.S.S. Constitution needs "welfare," and the U.S.S. Arizona memorial, and the local steam train preservation societies, and WWII Warbird museums, and The Grand Canyon National Park, etc. All important historical things need some assets to preserve them. It's too bad that some people let their personal bigotries and unwillingness to work for a goal get in the way of good sense... D.S. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
David Stinson wrote:
an_old_friend wrote: Just why would there need to be a test in order to use this specturm set aside One can either USE Morse Code or not But still the plea that Morse Code needs welfare in order to endure Yes, just as the U.S.S. Constitution needs "welfare," and the U.S.S. Arizona memorial, and the local steam train preservation societies, and WWII Warbird museums, and The Grand Canyon National Park, etc. All important historical things need some assets to preserve them. It's too bad that some people let their personal bigotries and unwillingness to work for a goal get in the way of good sense... D.S. Well if you think Morse Code needs this aid to suvive then it isn't the usefull mode that you describe Morse Code either needs aid to survive or not If it needs such help to survive it isn't the usefull mode you describe Your comments are better than most, but they still have this slipshod logic Of course you come back with those that oppose you are lazy and unpatriotic It is amazing that the blindness that results from not examing your beliefs |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Band allocation should be allocated on long term statistics generated in regards to the modes used... (past year or two) As CW continues its' drop, it needs less and less allocations... as no-coders now enter CW will have to shrink to accommodate the new users and their modes... John On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:09:49 -0700, an_old_friend wrote: Just why would there need to be a test in order to use this specturm set aside One can either USE Morse Code or not But still the plea that Morse Code needs welfare in order to endure David Stinson wrote: Comments submitted to the FCC, advocating ARRL administration of Morse license endorsment: ------------------- 18 Aug. 2005 WT Docket 05-235, Amateur Radio Morse Code Testing Requirement. cuting to save BW |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
John Smith wrote: Band allocation should be allocated on long term statistics generated in regards to the modes used... (past year or two) As CW continues its' drop, it needs less and less allocations... as no-coders now enter CW will have to shrink to accommodate the new users and their modes... John And yet His comments are some of the best I have seen in defense of Code testing He addreses the reasoning to the Public Good tries to relive the FCC of the Burdens involved all in all a decent defense of the indefensable On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:09:49 -0700, an_old_friend wrote: Just why would there need to be a test in order to use this specturm set aside One can either USE Morse Code or not But still the plea that Morse Code needs welfare in order to endure David Stinson wrote: Comments submitted to the FCC, advocating ARRL administration of Morse license endorsment: ------------------- 18 Aug. 2005 WT Docket 05-235, Amateur Radio Morse Code Testing Requirement. cuting to save BW |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
AOF:
One thing for sure, this group sure has a lot which do not value having anyone respecting their credibility... after a sufficient length of time it becomes obvious, the vast amount dis-information which flows off their keyboards... I think it is deeper than just them stating falsehoods they know to be untrue, it really is a depiction of their ignorance... John On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:48:11 -0700, an_old_friend wrote: John Smith wrote: Band allocation should be allocated on long term statistics generated in regards to the modes used... (past year or two) As CW continues its' drop, it needs less and less allocations... as no-coders now enter CW will have to shrink to accommodate the new users and their modes... John And yet His comments are some of the best I have seen in defense of Code testing He addreses the reasoning to the Public Good tries to relive the FCC of the Burdens involved all in all a decent defense of the indefensable On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:09:49 -0700, an_old_friend wrote: Just why would there need to be a test in order to use this specturm set aside One can either USE Morse Code or not But still the plea that Morse Code needs welfare in order to endure David Stinson wrote: Comments submitted to the FCC, advocating ARRL administration of Morse license endorsment: ------------------- 18 Aug. 2005 WT Docket 05-235, Amateur Radio Morse Code Testing Requirement. cuting to save BW |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
an_old_friend wrote: John Smith wrote: Band allocation should be allocated on long term statistics generated in regards to the modes used... (past year or two) As CW continues its' drop, it needs less and less allocations... as no-coders now enter CW will have to shrink to accommodate the new users and their modes... John And yet His comments are some of the best I have seen in defense of Code testing Gee whillikers, Mr Wizard...Some of those very same sentiments were uttered by other posters in this forum and you didn't hold the same opinion for them... He addreses the reasoning to the Public Good tries to relive the FCC of the Burdens involved "addresses" "relieve" all in all a decent defense of the indefensable "Lying" is indefensable. "Deceit" is indefensable. "Child Pornography" and "Spousal Abuse" are "indefensable. Seems to me he made some on-the-head comments. Steve, K4YZ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
KY4Z wrote: an_old_friend wrote: John Smith wrote: Band allocation should be allocated on long term statistics generated in regards to the modes used... (past year or two) As CW continues its' drop, it needs less and less allocations... as no-coders now enter CW will have to shrink to accommodate the new users and their modes... John And yet His comments are some of the best I have seen in defense of Code testing Gee whillikers, Mr Wizard...Some of those very same sentiments were uttered by other posters in this forum and you didn't hold the same opinion for them... Such as whom? He addreses the reasoning to the Public Good tries to relive the FCC of the Burdens involved "addresses" "relieve" all in all a decent defense of the indefensable "Lying" is indefensable. "Deceit" is indefensable. "Child Pornography" and "Spousal Abuse" are "indefensable. Your placement of lying, Kiddy porn, and Spousal abuse on the same level shows just how sick you truly are Seems to me he made some on-the-head comments. it would to you but then you omitted the bonehead idea that It realy reuires some kind of manual code tst in order to USE Morse Code Steve, KY4Z |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
an_old_friend wrote: KY4Z wrote: an_old_friend wrote: John Smith wrote: Band allocation should be allocated on long term statistics generated in regards to the modes used... (past year or two) As CW continues its' drop, it needs less and less allocations... as no-coders now enter CW will have to shrink to accommodate the new users and their modes... John And yet His comments are some of the best I have seen in defense of Code testing Gee whillikers, Mr Wizard...Some of those very same sentiments were uttered by other posters in this forum and you didn't hold the same opinion for them... Such as whom? Such as me. He addreses the reasoning to the Public Good tries to relive the FCC of the Burdens involved "addresses" "relieve" all in all a decent defense of the indefensable "Lying" is indefensable. "Deceit" is indefensable. "Child Pornography" and "Spousal Abuse" are "indefensable. Your placement of lying, Kiddy porn, and Spousal abuse on the same level shows just how sick you truly are Why? I consider all of them equally offensive. Each of them harm society in thier own right. For example, look where lying has got you! Seems to me he made some on-the-head comments. it would to you Becasue it did. Why do you think not? but then you omitted the bonehead idea that It realy reuires some kind of manual code tst in order to USE Morse Code "really" "requires" "test" It's not boneheaded. It's real. Steve, K4YZ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I think it is an excellent solution (except for the 10KHZ only part) to the
situation. Knowing the FCC, if it takes it off their hands they will jump on it. If they have time to write up the NPRM that is. Dan/W4NTI "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... John Smith wrote: Band allocation should be allocated on long term statistics generated in regards to the modes used... (past year or two) As CW continues its' drop, it needs less and less allocations... as no-coders now enter CW will have to shrink to accommodate the new users and their modes... John And yet His comments are some of the best I have seen in defense of Code testing He addreses the reasoning to the Public Good tries to relive the FCC of the Burdens involved all in all a decent defense of the indefensable On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:09:49 -0700, an_old_friend wrote: Just why would there need to be a test in order to use this specturm set aside One can either USE Morse Code or not But still the plea that Morse Code needs welfare in order to endure David Stinson wrote: Comments submitted to the FCC, advocating ARRL administration of Morse license endorsment: ------------------- 18 Aug. 2005 WT Docket 05-235, Amateur Radio Morse Code Testing Requirement. cuting to save BW |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Seeking comments from Icom PCR1000 Users | Scanner | |||
Seeking Comments from Icom PCR1000 Users | Shortwave | |||
Citizens make inappropriate comments? | Policy | |||
NASWA Draft BPL Comments | Shortwave | |||
BPL interference - reply comments - YOUR ACTION REQUIRED | Policy |