Yes, the content has changed vastly: 1) His rhetoric has risen to
leading a conspiracy against the US governmnet, i.e. urging hams not to
follow FCC interpretation of Part 97 while urging them to follow his
construction, 2) He now has a call in radio show, which may or may not
be violative, 3) He has involved himself and ham radio in many
instances of foreign policy, 4) There is now a commercial twist that
was never present in 1989, 5) He has begun defaming the man in charge
(Riley Hollingsworth], not present in 1989.

Even if his rule construction in certain aspects is correct and the
FCC's, incorrect, our system affords a way to handle that situation
through declaratory ruling in the administrative sector. None of us
has the right to urge others into non-compliance. Moreover, to defame
Riley Hollingsworth amounts to leading a conspiracy against our
government, because if we listen to Baxter, we're supposed to disregard
Hollingsworth, anti-thetical to a functioning Republic. Tieing into
his bulletins his Web Site, where he advertises money-making endeavors
is commercial, a Part 97 no-no. Supporting revolutions, such as the
one in Bougainville, clearly violates the Patriot Act, because none of
us can presume to do foreign policy, especially over ham radio.

This piece, not a complete analysis by any means, is but the tip of the
iceberg.

has he even been on the air recently?? haven't heard him in quite a while
on the old frequencies on 20m and 75m he had been occupying.

"Morris" wrote in message
oups.com...
Yes, the content has changed vastly: 1) His rhetoric has risen to
leading a conspiracy against the US governmnet, i.e. urging hams not to
follow FCC interpretation of Part 97 while urging them to follow his
construction, 2) He now has a call in radio show, which may or may not
be violative, 3) He has involved himself and ham radio in many
instances of foreign policy, 4) There is now a commercial twist that
was never present in 1989, 5) He has begun defaming the man in charge
(Riley Hollingsworth], not present in 1989.

Even if his rule construction in certain aspects is correct and the
FCC's, incorrect, our system affords a way to handle that situation
through declaratory ruling in the administrative sector. None of us
has the right to urge others into non-compliance. Moreover, to defame
Riley Hollingsworth amounts to leading a conspiracy against our
government, because if we listen to Baxter, we're supposed to disregard
Hollingsworth, anti-thetical to a functioning Republic. Tieing into
his bulletins his Web Site, where he advertises money-making endeavors
is commercial, a Part 97 no-no. Supporting revolutions, such as the
one in Bougainville, clearly violates the Patriot Act, because none of
us can presume to do foreign policy, especially over ham radio.

This piece, not a complete analysis by any means, is but the tip of the
iceberg.

Morris wrote:
Yes, the content has changed vastly: 1) His rhetoric has risen to
leading a conspiracy against the US governmnet, i.e. urging hams not to
follow FCC interpretation of Part 97 while urging them to follow his
construction,

well I hear alot any govt conspriay stuff ont he air these days

2) He now has a call in radio show, which may or may not
be violative,

not sure how but it would a change

3) He has involved himself and ham radio in many
instances of foreign policy, 4) There is now a commercial twist that
was never present in 1989, 5) He has begun defaming the man in charge
(Riley Hollingsworth], not present in 1989.

was not flaming others though in those days?

Even if his rule construction in certain aspects is correct and the
FCC's, incorrect, our system affords a way to handle that situation
through declaratory ruling in the administrative sector. None of us
has the right to urge others into non-compliance.

I could find a lot of people to disagree with you, there is a well
established (outside Ham radio) tradition of civl disobeince


Moreover, to defame
Riley Hollingsworth amounts to leading a conspiracy against our
government, because if we listen to Baxter, we're supposed to disregard
Hollingsworth, anti-thetical to a functioning Republic.

I'll have to pass that one onto Carl Rove with the suggestion that GW
start arresting his opponents for treason

Tieing into
his bulletins his Web Site, where he advertises money-making endeavors
is commercial, a Part 97 no-no.

but does the ARRL mention its website which certainly involved in
fundrasing and has links to comercail sitie

Supporting revolutions, such as the
one in Bougainville, clearly violates the Patriot Act, because none of
us can presume to do foreign policy, especially over ham radio.

Suporting govt change is NOT a violation of the patroit act.



This piece, not a complete analysis by any means, is but the tip of the
iceberg.

I thank you for it, but honestly I don't see anything beyond some
suggestions that Baxter might be best dealt by Mental health and not
the FCC. He seems to be not a nice person, but is not in and of itself
a rules violation

"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

Morris wrote:
Yes, the content has changed vastly: 1) His rhetoric has risen to
leading a conspiracy against the US governmnet, i.e. urging hams not to
follow FCC interpretation of Part 97 while urging them to follow his
construction,

well I hear alot any govt conspriay stuff ont he air these days

2) He now has a call in radio show, which may or may not
be violative,

not sure how but it would a change

3) He has involved himself and ham radio in many
instances of foreign policy, 4) There is now a commercial twist that
was never present in 1989, 5) He has begun defaming the man in charge
(Riley Hollingsworth], not present in 1989.

was not flaming others though in those days?

Even if his rule construction in certain aspects is correct and the
FCC's, incorrect, our system affords a way to handle that situation
through declaratory ruling in the administrative sector. None of us
has the right to urge others into non-compliance.

I could find a lot of people to disagree with you, there is a well
established (outside Ham radio) tradition of civl disobeince


Moreover, to defame
Riley Hollingsworth amounts to leading a conspiracy against our
government, because if we listen to Baxter, we're supposed to disregard
Hollingsworth, anti-thetical to a functioning Republic.

I'll have to pass that one onto Carl Rove with the suggestion that GW
start arresting his opponents for treason

Tieing into
his bulletins his Web Site, where he advertises money-making endeavors
is commercial, a Part 97 no-no.

but does the ARRL mention its website which certainly involved in
fundrasing and has links to comercail sitie

Supporting revolutions, such as the
one in Bougainville, clearly violates the Patriot Act, because none of
us can presume to do foreign policy, especially over ham radio.

Suporting govt change is NOT a violation of the patroit act.



This piece, not a complete analysis by any means, is but the tip of the
iceberg.

I thank you for it, but honestly I don't see anything beyond some
suggestions that Baxter might be best dealt by Mental health and not
the FCC. He seems to be not a nice person, but is not in and of itself
a rules violation


A sensible comment from 'an old friend'....again I am amazed....wait a
minute.....'an old friend' recognizing Glenn Baxter is in need of a rubber
room......right off the bat, eh? Perhaps a bit of experience 'old
friend'?

Dan/W4NTI

On 9 Sep 2005 19:31:08 -0700, N9OGL wrote:

LETTER TO G4WNE FROM FCC SPECIAL SERVICES
DIVISION CHIEF Robert H. Mc Namara - 2 November 1989:


(signed)

Robert H. Mc Namara
Chief, Special Services Division
Federal Communications Commission
Washington, D.C. 20554

There never was a "Special Services Division" for Bob McNamara to be
chief of.

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane

Yes there was a Special Services Division of the Private Radio Bureau
when McNamara wrote his letter in 1989. Having been in contact on 20
meters with Kenneth Black in the U.K., I received a copy of this letter
from the recipient, who said he received it via regular mail in the UK.
In addition, I flew to DC and interviewed Mcnamara, together with
Counsel Tom Fitzgibbons, for the express purpose of airing over ham
radio. Accordingly, the interviews ran for a few weeks over Baxter's
Network, then called the IARN.

Bob Sherin, W4ASX

Not true, I dug out an FCC rule book from late 80's and there was a
Special Services Division in the Private Radio Bureau.

Todd N9OGL

There is little doubt Baxter has several contacts (leaks, informants,
etc.) inside the FCC. The commission continues to be powerless
to rectify its internal security problems. Commercial interests have
taken full advantage of FCC informants, and one can be certain
over the years that Baxter has developed several credible sources
of information inside the FCC. Just one case in point. Two
commission employees in the Northeast/DC areas would become
aware of imminent CB enforcement actions. They would email
others specific details about the imminent enforcement effort, and
worse yet, would discuss it on ham repeaters. Within hours, illegal
CB equipment was pulled from shelves, and local freeband
frequencies would go quiet. Legal CB channels, area ham
repeaters, and email would be full of specific details of the
pending enforcement actions. The same two commission employees
served as valuable sources of information for commercial
interests, allowing them lead time to prepare for FCC inspections.
Overheard a ARRL official once say he guessed there were dozens
of reliable sources of information inside the FCC.

John Smith wrote:
There is little doubt Baxter has several contacts (leaks, informants,
etc.) inside the FCC. The commission continues to be powerless
to rectify its internal security problems. Commercial interests have
taken full advantage of FCC informants, and one can be certain
over the years that Baxter has developed several credible sources
of information inside the FCC. Just one case in point. Two
commission employees in the Northeast/DC areas would become
aware of imminent CB enforcement actions. They would email
others specific details about the imminent enforcement effort, and
worse yet, would discuss it on ham repeaters. Within hours, illegal
CB equipment was pulled from shelves, and local freeband
frequencies would go quiet. Legal CB channels, area ham
repeaters, and email would be full of specific details of the
pending enforcement actions. The same two commission employees
served as valuable sources of information for commercial
interests, allowing them lead time to prepare for FCC inspections.
Overheard a ARRL official once say he guessed there were dozens
of reliable sources of information inside the FCC.




Care to site a source for those statements?

In article
Lloyd wrote:

you an others are just jelous of k1man but nobody could stop him since
1987 and it is to late now. barf will probaly merger with the iarn if the
talks go good and then they will grow biger than the arrl. barf and the

Says the "self-appointed" barfie Lloydie....who Herb Schoenbaum thought
was an idiot. Along with the rest of the ham community.

iarn are in talks right now so watch out. k1man is a great man and he will
lead us to victory and bring a new day to ham radio esp after cw is droped
from the exam and real radio hobbiests can become hams and iarn members.

barf and iarn rule!!!!!

That's our Lardass Lloyd Davies, always running his stupid mouth never
knowing what the hell he is talking about.
You are waiting to see if they will drop the code to get your General,
Davies, you are too stupid and lazy to EARN your General, you want it
handed to you because you are not all there. Sort of "affrimative
action," you want the standards lowered because you can't pass them as
they currently stand.


On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Bob Sherin, W4ASX wrote:

In all deference Lloyd, I take issue with you. He is neither great nor
is the FCC afraid of him.

Rather, I believe with age mental disorder is advancing and the FCC
today is into cost effectiveness, which means solve problems without
litigation.

Lloyd Davies, N0VFP is a mentally ill retard.

LARDASS Davies admits he's mentally challenged
in
http://www.network54.com/Hide/Forum/...eid=1073965472
"I have no problems with learning code. I get stuck after I work on
about 5-10
letters. I cannot go any further. I'm stuck. I get a mental block."