Yes, the content has changed vastly: 1) His rhetoric has risen to
leading a conspiracy against the US governmnet, i.e. urging hams not to
follow FCC interpretation of Part 97 while urging them to follow his
construction, 2) He now has a call in radio show, which may or may not
be violative, 3) He has involved himself and ham radio in many
instances of foreign policy, 4) There is now a commercial twist that
was never present in 1989, 5) He has begun defaming the man in charge
(Riley Hollingsworth], not present in 1989.

Even if his rule construction in certain aspects is correct and the
FCC's, incorrect, our system affords a way to handle that situation
through declaratory ruling in the administrative sector. None of us
has the right to urge others into non-compliance. Moreover, to defame
Riley Hollingsworth amounts to leading a conspiracy against our
government, because if we listen to Baxter, we're supposed to disregard
Hollingsworth, anti-thetical to a functioning Republic. Tieing into
his bulletins his Web Site, where he advertises money-making endeavors
is commercial, a Part 97 no-no. Supporting revolutions, such as the
one in Bougainville, clearly violates the Patriot Act, because none of
us can presume to do foreign policy, especially over ham radio.

This piece, not a complete analysis by any means, is but the tip of the
iceberg.