Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
KØHB wrote:
"Michael Coslo" wrote This is what has me worried. If a new Whiz-bang system is going to work, it has to connect the whole nation. Mike, Come back to the discussion when you understand the term "regional interoperability". DOS Hint: It has absolutely nothing to do with "connect the whole nation". Hans, As the Czar of this discussion, how about TELLING us exactly what Obrien's regional interopability plan is? ;^) Even a little clue might help the dillatentes like me. And I'm telling you that IMO any system that doesn't connect areas larger than "regional" is not going to work under many circumstances. Of course I could be wrong. - Mike KB3EIA - |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Coslo" wrote As the Czar of this discussion, how about TELLING us exactly what Obrien's regional interopability plan is? ;^) Even a little clue might help the dillatentes like me. Actually (if you read his piece) OBrien doesn't profess to have a plan, but rather suggests that Katrina and the impending availability of 700MHz, may be the catalyst that causes (like a good kick in the ass) serious non-lip-service attention at the metropolitan and regional levels to survivable incident-wide first-responder communications systems. And I'm telling you that IMO any system that doesn't connect areas larger than "regional" is not going to work under many circumstances. That's a separate and distinctly different kettle of fish. Think of intra-incident (first responders, search and rescue) as tactical communications, and extra-incident (recovery, supply/logistics) as strategic communications. You need both, but they are completely different animals and treating them similarly inevitably means that you won't get either one right. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K=D8HB wrote: "Mike Coslo" wrote As the Czar of this discussion, how about TELLING us exactly what Obrie= n's regional interopability plan is? ;^) Even a little clue might help the dillatentes like me. Actually (if you read his piece) OBrien doesn't profess to have a plan, b= ut rather suggests that Katrina and the impending availability of 700MHz, ma= y be the catalyst that causes (like a good kick in the ass) serious non-lip-se= rvice attention at the metropolitan and regional levels to survivable incident-= wide first-responder communications systems. If 9-11 couldn't accomplish that kick, Katrina sure can't. All the while the SECDEF and the JCS strive to make the military lighter and faster, the Senate makes our government more sluggish and stupid. If only Katrina had been the leader of a Christian Cult. And I'm telling you that IMO any system that doesn't connect areas larg= er than "regional" is not going to work under many circumstances. That's a separate and distinctly different kettle of fish. Think of intra-incident (first responders, search and rescue) as tactical communications, and extra-incident (recovery, supply/logistics) as strate= gic communications. You need both, but they are completely different animals= and treating them similarly inevitably means that you won't get either one ri= ght. 73, de Hans, K0HB Hans, you missed your calling in life. You shudda been a communicator. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|