wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


wrote:


wrote:

I just hope he chooses to leave (with the rest that don't want to
discuss any issue)

God, where the Bible lies, distance to the moon, how the tests have
gotten easier, why a Morse Code Test would be a barrier to Morse Code
use, why they can't get a helium balloon off the ground, the amateur
radio service during WWII, etc, etc, etc,.

You left out the 143 tellings of what the U.S. Army used at ADA a half
century ago, numerous recountings of Len Anderson having passed an exam
for the First Phone a half century ago, various tales of how many houses
and cars Len has and what things he paid *CASH* for.

Dave K8MN

Wrong again. Len will not be invited to Mike's BBS for the retelling
of ADA comms.

Please refer to the portion reading, "the rest that don't want to
discuss any issue". Most of Len's rants are not discussions of issues.


Please stay on topic.

I've re-read your post, searching for any small portion where you seem
to be on topic.


But maybe after you guys huddle on Mike's BBS for a while and figure
out how far it is to the moon, Jim can report back here.

I haven't written anything about going anywhere. If I haven't left over
your playing red-hatted monkey and haven't left over Len's stream of
conciousness rants, Colonel Mark's mindless drivel and Roger Wiseman's
filth aren't likely to result in my departure.


You've got "staying power." Excellent. Too bad you're almost never on
topic.

Here's the thread's topic: "Lennie Reveals True Identity of
'Dudly'....And It Is HE!" Please point to any portion of your initial
or subsequent posts which are on topic.



I do find it interesting that you and Mark have found so much common ground.

Dave K8MN


We're two of a handful of people on RRAP who have received veiled
threats.

....or so you both perceive. You two both seem to have common ground in
your perception of yourselves as victims as well.

I don't like bullying behavio[u]r, and neither does Mark.

....and contrary to what you've stated, you're both quick to dismiss it
if it comes from Leonard H. Anderson.

Gosh, whe have so much in common.

You certainly do. You're both victims of that morse code testing demon.

Dave K8MN

wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:20:14 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:


wrote:

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:40:18 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:



wrote:


wrote:



On 27 Oct 2005 04:37:48 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:




wrote:



K4YZ wrote:

He's repeatedly stated that his ONLY reason for being "here" is to
"debate" the Morse Code test issue.

More often than not he's ranting off on the "Mighty Morsemen"
tangent without even mentioning the tests.

which right on target if a bit wordy


At least it has to do with what's wrong with Morse testing.

Not at all. It has more to do with what's wrong with Len.

gain with you lordly [pronouncements Dave

Yes, I have a lot of ways to obtain gain, Mark. There are antennas and
amplifiers and even methods for financial gain. You're a real clown.
You have opinions but mine are "lordly pronouncements".


you are the one claiming that your opinion are facts

Nope, that's not quite correct, Mark. *You* are the one claiming that
facts are my opinion.

i call that sort of arogance making lordly pronoucements

Sure you would. After all, you brought up "lordly pronoucements". I
didn't.

since you have not in fact lied yet or been too uncivl I read and
reply some more

I'll go you one better: You have lied and been uncivil. Sometimes I
read your stuff anyway.


and you complain Len doesn't debate

No, I *stated* that Len doesn't debate. It is verifiable fact.


now you are lying by presenting your opinion as a fact

No, Colonel, I'm not lying. Please show an instance of where Len
Anderson has engaged in civil debate. One instance will do.

cuting the rest

(reinserting the rest)

you come off like you climb Mt Sinai talked to god and got a new set
of comandments just for ham radio (of course done in morse by the
very finger of God)


You're making stuff up and I don't choose to discuss my religious
views with a pagan.

If you read his windy diatribes, you'd think he'd been beaten with
a rusty Vibroplex as a child.

maybe you read it that way


Yes, I did.

To me they sound like he met a few of the MMM in real life I can
certainly attest to what that feels like


I feel certain that every small grade appears as a mountain to you.
You have more issues than most folks.

Dave K8MN

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:39:30 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:12:03 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:


wrote:

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:35:21 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:



wrote:


Dave Heil wrote:



wrote:



wrote:

I just hope he chooses to leave (with the rest that don't want to
discuss any issue)

God, where the Bible lies, distance to the moon, how the tests have
gotten easier, why a Morse Code Test would be a barrier to Morse Code
use, why they can't get a helium balloon off the ground, the amateur
radio service during WWII, etc, etc, etc,.

You left out the 143 tellings of what the U.S. Army used at ADA a half
century ago, numerous recountings of Len Anderson having passed an exam
for the First Phone a half century ago, various tales of how many houses
and cars Len has and what things he paid *CASH* for.

Dave K8MN


Wrong again. Len will not be invited to Mike's BBS for the retelling
of ADA comms.

Please refer to the portion reading, "the rest that don't want to
discuss any issue". Most of Len's rants are not discussions of issues.


In your opinion

No, Mark, not in my opinion. The vast majority of Len Anderson's posts
are simply anti-morse use/testing, anti-amateur radio, anti-ARRL. If
you want opinion, my opinion is that Len is horse's patoo


yes it is your opinion

Which one is my opinion, Mark? I've stated one as fact. A fact is
something which can be verified as true.

then by stating your opinion as fact you have lied and

BBBUUUUUZZZZ

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

On 28 Oct 2005 03:56:33 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

Brian is willing to lower his standards to a great extent if he finds
someone who is against morse testing. In this case, you represent the
lowered standards.

The entire pro-code, pro-code test faction on RRAP was willing to lower
"thier" standards once they realized that Steven J. Robeson,
K4YZ/K4CAP/K4MARS, was willing to do pro-code, pro-code test dirty work
as primary belligerent and bully. Too bad for your side of the debate.

Belligerent?

sure you are belligerent

and since you are not honest enough to admit it
BUUUUZZZZ
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

On 28 Oct 2005 03:21:55 -0700, wrote:


wrote:

I tell you seeing the inability of some of the procoders to see what
is written in front of them I am forced to wonder if too much code use
does not cause brain damge to some folks

Decades ago in 73 magazine, Wayne Green was writing the same thing.
Wayne Green was plain wrong about many things but assuming you are
cottect I real think he got that one right

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

On 28 Oct 2005 03:17:29 -0700, wrote:


Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
cut
But maybe after you guys huddle on Mike's BBS for a while and figure
out how far it is to the moon, Jim can report back here.

I haven't written anything about going anywhere. If I haven't left over
your playing red-hatted monkey and haven't left over Len's stream of
conciousness rants, Colonel Mark's mindless drivel and Roger Wiseman's
filth aren't likely to result in my departure.

You've got "staying power." Excellent. Too bad you're almost never on
topic.

I do find it interesting that you and Mark have found so much common ground.

Dave K8MN

We're two of a handful of people on RRAP who have received veiled
threats. I don't like bullying behavio[u]r, and neither does Mark.
Gosh, whe have so much in common.

you know I object to you calling it a handful a fraction of the
RRAPers largeer presnetage wise than say the Black population of this
country has receivec threats viled or otherwise

I would also say if I were not trying to be civil that we are seeing
the work of Barbarians, but since i am trying to civil i'll not say it

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

On 28 Oct 2005 02:33:25 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:20:14 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

and you complain Len doesn't debate

No, I *stated* that Len doesn't debate. It is verifiable fact.

now you are lying by presenting your opinion as a fact

It's not "opinion". It's fact.

nope it is opinion therefore you llie again
and BBUZZZZ


_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:47:30 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:20:14 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:


wrote:

cut

which right on target if a bit wordy


At least it has to do with what's wrong with Morse testing.

Not at all. It has more to do with what's wrong with Len.

gain with you lordly [pronouncements Dave

Yes, I have a lot of ways to obtain gain, Mark. There are antennas and
amplifiers and even methods for financial gain. You're a real clown.
You have opinions but mine are "lordly pronouncements".


you are the one claiming that your opinion are facts

Nope, that's not quite correct, Mark. *You* are the one claiming that
facts are my opinion.

becuase they are your opinions

annd again a lie so BBBUUUZZZZ

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:39:30 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:


wrote:

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:12:03 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:



wrote:


On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:35:21 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:




wrote:



Dave Heil wrote:




wrote:




wrote:

I just hope he chooses to leave (with the rest that don't want to
discuss any issue)

God, where the Bible lies, distance to the moon, how the tests have
gotten easier, why a Morse Code Test would be a barrier to Morse Code
use, why they can't get a helium balloon off the ground, the amateur
radio service during WWII, etc, etc, etc,.

You left out the 143 tellings of what the U.S. Army used at ADA a half
century ago, numerous recountings of Len Anderson having passed an exam
for the First Phone a half century ago, various tales of how many houses
and cars Len has and what things he paid *CASH* for.

Dave K8MN


Wrong again. Len will not be invited to Mike's BBS for the retelling
of ADA comms.

Please refer to the portion reading, "the rest that don't want to
discuss any issue". Most of Len's rants are not discussions of issues.


In your opinion

No, Mark, not in my opinion. The vast majority of Len Anderson's posts
are simply anti-morse use/testing, anti-amateur radio, anti-ARRL. If
you want opinion, my opinion is that Len is horse's patoo


yes it is your opinion

Which one is my opinion, Mark? I've stated one as fact. A fact is
something which can be verified as true.


then by stating your opinion as fact you have lied and

BBBUUUUUZZZZ

That is incorrect, Mark. I have not stated my opinion as fact.
You can't write well; you can't read well. Your lack of skills leaves
you with erroneous views.

Dave K8MN

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:12:32 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:39:30 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

cut

No, Mark, not in my opinion. The vast majority of Len Anderson's posts
are simply anti-morse use/testing, anti-amateur radio, anti-ARRL. If
you want opinion, my opinion is that Len is horse's patoo


yes it is your opinion

Which one is my opinion, Mark? I've stated one as fact. A fact is
something which can be verified as true.


then by stating your opinion as fact you have lied and

BBBUUUUUZZZZ

That is incorrect, Mark. I have not stated my opinion as fact.
"I've stated one as fact." no other way of parsing that sentence

so BUZZZ

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account