wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:47:52 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:


wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


wrote:


On 27 Oct 2005 04:37:48 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:


K4YZ wrote:


wrote:

Len is on-topic far more often than you.

No he's not.


Big Lie #1.



He's repeatedly stated that his ONLY reason for being "here" is to
"debate" the Morse Code test issue.

More often than not he's ranting off on the "Mighty Morsemen"
tangent without even mentioning the tests.

which right on target if a bit wordy

How is that "right on target"? It isn't civil and he isn't debating.


Steve quoted nothing about civility.

That's nice. Len claims to be here for civil debate of the morse
testing issue. The problem is, he isn't civil and spends very little of
his time debating.


when did he say he came here For CIVIL deabte?

Please, Mark, do your own research. I'm not here for your welfare.
The same archives available to the rest of us are available to you.
I do understand that you've not been very successful in their use in
some earlier attempts and that you often misinterpret them when you do
find and archived post. At very least, you've misrepresented them.

That would be Pot/Kettle/Black.

Would it? Did Steve claim to be here for civil debate of morse testing?


he does claim to be civil

So does Len. I can understand Steve's difficulties in being civil with
you. I don't feel much like being civil with you.

But since you bring up civility, you say nothing about Steve's
civility. Steve isn't civil and he isn't debating.


Standard Mighty
Macho Morse Man double-standard technique. Hi!

Come to think of it, Cheesey, you don't seem to be here for civility or
debate. What was that thing about a pot and a kettle?


what nobody is civil but you?

Where was that written?

right meet the kettle

I submit that you'd not only have trouble identifying a pot or kettle
but would find it difficult to spell the words correctly in two
different sentences.


He isn't a radio amateur who uses CW and he isn't a radio amateur who
uses any other mode.


Are you trying to say that he isn't a radio amateur? I think Len
self-identified on that one.

Great. Then I'm sure that he won't have any difficulties with my
identification of him. Len has difficulties with those who use morse,
those who favor retention of morse testing and even with those radio
amateurs who use other modes.


He is a pathetic geezer with no stake in amateur
radio and an he has an ax to grind.

...an ax[e] to grind.

Please purchase a dictionary.


So says the Mighty Macho Morse Man.

Which poster claims to be a Mighty Macho Morse Man?


you are not honest enough to claim it

Mark, you continue to be a babbling twit.

Dave K8MN

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:26:52 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:47:52 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:


wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


wrote:


On 27 Oct 2005 04:37:48 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:


K4YZ wrote:


wrote:

Len is on-topic far more often than you.

No he's not.


Big Lie #1.



He's repeatedly stated that his ONLY reason for being "here" is to
"debate" the Morse Code test issue.

More often than not he's ranting off on the "Mighty Morsemen"
tangent without even mentioning the tests.

which right on target if a bit wordy

How is that "right on target"? It isn't civil and he isn't debating.


Steve quoted nothing about civility.

That's nice. Len claims to be here for civil debate of the morse
testing issue. The problem is, he isn't civil and spends very little of
his time debating.


when did he say he came here For CIVIL deabte?

Please, Mark, do your own research.

if you can't be civl I'll simply cut you off

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:26:52 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:


wrote:

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:47:52 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:



wrote:


Dave Heil wrote:



wrote:



On 27 Oct 2005 04:37:48 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:



wrote:



K4YZ wrote:



wrote:

Len is on-topic far more often than you.

No he's not.


Big Lie #1.




He's repeatedly stated that his ONLY reason for being "here" is to
"debate" the Morse Code test issue.

More often than not he's ranting off on the "Mighty Morsemen"
tangent without even mentioning the tests.

which right on target if a bit wordy

How is that "right on target"? It isn't civil and he isn't debating.


Steve quoted nothing about civility.

That's nice. Len claims to be here for civil debate of the morse
testing issue. The problem is, he isn't civil and spends very little of
his time debating.


when did he say he came here For CIVIL deabte?

Please, Mark, do your own research.


if you can't be civl I'll simply cut you off

Promises, promises.

Dave K8MN