wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:20:14 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

and you complain Len doesn't debate

No, I *stated* that Len doesn't debate. It is verifiable fact.

now you are lying by presenting your opinion as a fact

It's not "opinion". It's fact.

Lennie Anderson, his protestations to the contrary, does NOT
"debate" anything...He throws his opinions in your face, and if you
dare to suggest that his opinions are flawed, the insults come out.

He claims that I and others do this to him, but nothing happens to
Lennie that Lennie didn't initiate.

cuting the rest

No, you mean "censoring the rest".

Steve, K4YZ

Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

wrote:

wrote:

I just hope he chooses to leave (with the rest that don't want to
discuss any issue)

God, where the Bible lies, distance to the moon, how the tests have
gotten easier, why a Morse Code Test would be a barrier to Morse Code
use, why they can't get a helium balloon off the ground, the amateur
radio service during WWII, etc, etc, etc,.

You left out the 143 tellings of what the U.S. Army used at ADA a half
century ago, numerous recountings of Len Anderson having passed an exam
for the First Phone a half century ago, various tales of how many houses
and cars Len has and what things he paid *CASH* for.

Dave K8MN

Wrong again. Len will not be invited to Mike's BBS for the retelling
of ADA comms.

Please refer to the portion reading, "the rest that don't want to
discuss any issue". Most of Len's rants are not discussions of issues.

Please stay on topic.

But maybe after you guys huddle on Mike's BBS for a while and figure
out how far it is to the moon, Jim can report back here.

I haven't written anything about going anywhere. If I haven't left over
your playing red-hatted monkey and haven't left over Len's stream of
conciousness rants, Colonel Mark's mindless drivel and Roger Wiseman's
filth aren't likely to result in my departure.

You've got "staying power." Excellent. Too bad you're almost never on
topic.

I do find it interesting that you and Mark have found so much common ground.

Dave K8MN

We're two of a handful of people on RRAP who have received veiled
threats. I don't like bullying behavio[u]r, and neither does Mark.
Gosh, whe have so much in common.

wrote:

I tell you seeing the inability of some of the procoders to see what
is written in front of them I am forced to wonder if too much code use
does not cause brain damge to some folks

Decades ago in 73 magazine, Wayne Green was writing the same thing.

Dave Heil wrote:

No, Mark, not in my opinion. The vast majority of Len Anderson's posts
are simply anti-morse use/testing, anti-amateur radio, anti-ARRL.

Well there you have it.

Dave admits that the vast majority of Len's post are on-topic.

Dave Heil wrote:

Brian is willing to lower his standards to a great extent if he finds
someone who is against morse testing. In this case, you represent the
lowered standards.

The entire pro-code, pro-code test faction on RRAP was willing to lower
"thier" standards once they realized that Steven J. Robeson,
K4YZ/K4CAP/K4MARS, was willing to do pro-code, pro-code test dirty work
as primary belligerent and bully. Too bad for your side of the debate.

wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

Brian is willing to lower his standards to a great extent if he finds
someone who is against morse testing. In this case, you represent the
lowered standards.

The entire pro-code, pro-code test faction on RRAP was willing to lower
"thier" standards once they realized that Steven J. Robeson,
K4YZ/K4CAP/K4MARS, was willing to do pro-code, pro-code test dirty work
as primary belligerent and bully. Too bad for your side of the debate.

Belligerent?

Bully?

Strange words coming from a guy who's claims "admiration" for a
person known to be a pathological liar and deceiver. Even more strange
when one considers your numerous outstanding unresolved claims about
Amatuer Radio...all of which, to date, have been proven false.

Nice try, Brain. Now try again.

Steve, K4YZ

You'll just whine about it, huh, asshole?

And you sit on your fat ass whining..........

wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:12:03 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:


wrote:

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:35:21 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:



wrote:


Dave Heil wrote:



wrote:



wrote:

I just hope he chooses to leave (with the rest that don't want to
discuss any issue)

God, where the Bible lies, distance to the moon, how the tests have
gotten easier, why a Morse Code Test would be a barrier to Morse Code
use, why they can't get a helium balloon off the ground, the amateur
radio service during WWII, etc, etc, etc,.

You left out the 143 tellings of what the U.S. Army used at ADA a half
century ago, numerous recountings of Len Anderson having passed an exam
for the First Phone a half century ago, various tales of how many houses
and cars Len has and what things he paid *CASH* for.

Dave K8MN


Wrong again. Len will not be invited to Mike's BBS for the retelling
of ADA comms.

Please refer to the portion reading, "the rest that don't want to
discuss any issue". Most of Len's rants are not discussions of issues.


In your opinion

No, Mark, not in my opinion. The vast majority of Len Anderson's posts
are simply anti-morse use/testing, anti-amateur radio, anti-ARRL. If
you want opinion, my opinion is that Len is horse's patoo


yes it is your opinion

Which one is my opinion, Mark? I've stated one as fact. A fact is
something which can be verified as true.

your effort to label your opinion as fat...

My "effort" to do what? In the instance I offered above, I present fact
and then provided an opinion. Do you label all of your opinions?

get the rest of the hack job...

Get it? Where did it go?

since till you learn you are not the font of all fact

If you want folks to take you seriously, Mark, you must stop issuing
falsehoods. I've made no statement describing myself as the "font of
all fact".

you are not
engaging in deabte yourself

No, I've not engaged in "deabte" and I'm not sure that it is legal in my
state. I have engaged in debate and discussion here and elsewhere but
I've never stated, even once, that my purpose here is to engage in
debate, civil or otherwise.

Dave K8MN

wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:26:52 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:


wrote:

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 03:47:52 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:



wrote:


Dave Heil wrote:



wrote:



On 27 Oct 2005 04:37:48 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:



wrote:



K4YZ wrote:



wrote:

Len is on-topic far more often than you.

No he's not.


Big Lie #1.




He's repeatedly stated that his ONLY reason for being "here" is to
"debate" the Morse Code test issue.

More often than not he's ranting off on the "Mighty Morsemen"
tangent without even mentioning the tests.

which right on target if a bit wordy

How is that "right on target"? It isn't civil and he isn't debating.


Steve quoted nothing about civility.

That's nice. Len claims to be here for civil debate of the morse
testing issue. The problem is, he isn't civil and spends very little of
his time debating.


when did he say he came here For CIVIL deabte?

Please, Mark, do your own research.


if you can't be civl I'll simply cut you off

Promises, promises.

Dave K8MN