Scorecard on WT Docket 05-235
 

Mike Coslo wrote:
wrote:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:41:58 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:


wrote:

On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:23:24 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:



wrote:


wrote:



cutns?

Strange. I read about the PCTA's being ill mannered and rude. I do find
in practice however, that the NCTA's and interested others are the ones
telling people to keep their mouth shut.


yea we advocate against harrassment one of the worst forms of rudeness

Procders complain that other excercising there free speech is somehow
infringing on their own

So I guess what you are saying is that your cause is so righteous that
you are justified in squelching the other side?


no effort to squech it has been made. he has the right to ignore me if
he likes, as do you of course, and I have the right to tell to shut
up and stoping acting like High Inqusitor or impling that Len is doing
something imporper in reading and counting as he sees fit

How many hunderd question does Jim need to ask before he reconizes
that Len is not required to answer him

or when wil Jim realize there has not been a grand inquistitor
apponointed eith for Ham radio or RRAP

People that tell other people to shut up are acting like grand inquisitors.

wrong again

Inquistors intoragte they want the target to talk

learn english


A lot of people on the no-code side don;t like Jim because he generally
keeps his cool, and puts forth pretty good arguments.

wrong again we don't like Jim becuase he beats daed horses into
unreconizable plup and then gooes right on beating them

he does keep his cool beter than say Stevie (but then so does an active
volcano)

Jim is the best on his side but he goes to far in making aever post a
recitation of 50-100 years of history, told from his point of view only


- Mike KB3EIA -

Scorecard on WT Docket 05-235
 

Mike Coslo wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
On 21 Oct 2005 20:05:26 -0700, wrote:
wrote:

grow up

What does that mean in this context?

in this context it means either do your own countor shut up

Why? Is Len's count somehow sacred, and not open to any
questions?

Strange. I read about the PCTA's being ill mannered and rude.

Some are. Others aren't. Same for NCTAs. Plenty of good and
bad examples on both sides.

I do find
in practice however, that the NCTA's and interested
others are the ones
telling people to keep their mouth shut.

I think it's a lot more accurate to cite specific
instances and individuals rather than make sweeping
generalizations.

For example, there's Len's classic "feldwebel post", where he
told K8MN to "shut the hell up". Now Mark is saying that I
should either do my own analysis of the comments or shut up,
rather than ask any questions about Len's count.

Are any of my questions about Len's 'scorecard' unreasonable?

Ya notice that too, Jim?

I notice that Mark objects to my questions about Len's 'scorecard', but
has no complaints about
Len's behavior here. Or his own...

73 de Jim, N2EY

Scorecard on WT Docket 05-235
 

On 22 Oct 2005 17:28:18 -0700, wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
On 21 Oct 2005 20:05:26 -0700, wrote:
wrote:

grow up

What does that mean in this context?

in this context it means either do your own countor shut up

Why? Is Len's count somehow sacred, and not open to any
questions?

Strange. I read about the PCTA's being ill mannered and rude.

Some are. Others aren't. Same for NCTAs. Plenty of good and
bad examples on both sides.

I do find
in practice however, that the NCTA's and interested
others are the ones
telling people to keep their mouth shut.

I think it's a lot more accurate to cite specific
instances and individuals rather than make sweeping
generalizations.

For example, there's Len's classic "feldwebel post", where he
told K8MN to "shut the hell up". Now Mark is saying that I
should either do my own analysis of the comments or shut up,
rather than ask any questions about Len's count.

i ask you to stop beat a dead horse

Are any of my questions about Len's 'scorecard' unreasonable?

yes all of them and it is unreasonable to ask the volume of them

Ya notice that too, Jim?

I notice that Mark objects to my questions about Len's 'scorecard', but
has no complaints about
Len's behavior here.
you have not been reading evry closely

I offer my rebukes to Len and Brain and Farnk even Bill Sohl

it is logical to expcet that I am going to agree more with folks that
hold my own views the more views we have in common the less likely we
are to disagree

Or his own...

73 de Jim, N2EY

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

Scorecard on WT Docket 05-235
 

Everyone is wrong...wrong wrong again...Except the jerkoff Markie. Damn
boy, wake up and smell the roses.

Dan/W4NTI

"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com...

Mike Coslo wrote:
wrote:
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:41:58 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:


wrote:

On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:23:24 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote:



wrote:


wrote:



cutns?

Strange. I read about the PCTA's being ill mannered and rude. I do
find
in practice however, that the NCTA's and interested others are the
ones
telling people to keep their mouth shut.


yea we advocate against harrassment one of the worst forms of rudeness

Procders complain that other excercising there free speech is somehow
infringing on their own

So I guess what you are saying is that your cause is so righteous that
you are justified in squelching the other side?


no effort to squech it has been made. he has the right to ignore me if
he likes, as do you of course, and I have the right to tell to shut
up and stoping acting like High Inqusitor or impling that Len is doing
something imporper in reading and counting as he sees fit

How many hunderd question does Jim need to ask before he reconizes
that Len is not required to answer him

or when wil Jim realize there has not been a grand inquistitor
apponointed eith for Ham radio or RRAP

People that tell other people to shut up are acting like grand
inquisitors.

wrong again

Inquistors intoragte they want the target to talk

learn english


A lot of people on the no-code side don;t like Jim because he generally
keeps his cool, and puts forth pretty good arguments.

wrong again we don't like Jim becuase he beats daed horses into
unreconizable plup and then gooes right on beating them

he does keep his cool beter than say Stevie (but then so does an active
volcano)

Jim is the best on his side but he goes to far in making aever post a
recitation of 50-100 years of history, told from his point of view only


- Mike KB3EIA -

Scorecard on WT Docket 05-235
 

On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 01:37:17 GMT, "Dan/W4NTI"
wrote:

Everyone is wrong...wrong wrong again...Except the jerkoff Markie. Damn
boy, wake up and smell the roses.

when someome lies about what I said I call em you too if needed

and you are a self confessed hate filled bigot who claims anyone he
does like saying the same things as he does hates Ham radio

Dan/W4NTI


but then you are such an easy target
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

Scorecard on WT Docket 05-235
 

wrong wrong....every body is wrong except me me Im right....your
wrong...I'm right.

Markie the moron

wrote in message
...
On 22 Oct 2005 17:28:18 -0700, wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
On 21 Oct 2005 20:05:26 -0700, wrote:
wrote:

grow up

What does that mean in this context?

in this context it means either do your own countor shut up

Why? Is Len's count somehow sacred, and not open to any
questions?

Strange. I read about the PCTA's being ill mannered and rude.

Some are. Others aren't. Same for NCTAs. Plenty of good and
bad examples on both sides.

I do find
in practice however, that the NCTA's and interested
others are the ones
telling people to keep their mouth shut.

I think it's a lot more accurate to cite specific
instances and individuals rather than make sweeping
generalizations.

For example, there's Len's classic "feldwebel post", where he
told K8MN to "shut the hell up". Now Mark is saying that I
should either do my own analysis of the comments or shut up,
rather than ask any questions about Len's count.

i ask you to stop beat a dead horse

Are any of my questions about Len's 'scorecard' unreasonable?

yes all of them and it is unreasonable to ask the volume of them

Ya notice that too, Jim?

I notice that Mark objects to my questions about Len's 'scorecard', but
has no complaints about
Len's behavior here.
you have not been reading evry closely

I offer my rebukes to Len and Brain and Farnk even Bill Sohl

it is logical to expcet that I am going to agree more with folks that
hold my own views the more views we have in common the less likely we
are to disagree

Or his own...

73 de Jim, N2EY

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

Scorecard on WT Docket 05-235
 

On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 01:39:46 GMT, "Dan/W4NTI"
wrote:

wrong wrong....every body is wrong except me me Im right....your
wrong...I'm right.

yea you say that a lot Dan it does not make it true

when you say something it is ok someone else say the same thing they
hate Ham radio
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

Scorecard on WT Docket 05-235
 

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 01:37:17 GMT, "Dan/W4NTI"
wrote:

Everyone is wrong...wrong wrong again...Except the jerkoff Markie. Damn
boy, wake up and smell the roses.

when someome lies about what I said I call em you too if needed

and you are a self confessed hate filled bigot who claims anyone he
does like saying the same things as he does hates Ham radio

Dan/W4NTI


but then you are such an easy target

I don't run around on a DAILY BASIS and ROUTINLY accuse people of being
liars, bigots, hate mongers, etc. Oh and tell the FBI to go find Kennedy's
killer. Do something useful.

BWAHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAaa

Dan/W4NTI

Scorecard on WT Docket 05-235
 

"Dan/W4NTI" wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 01:37:17 GMT, "Dan/W4NTI"
wrote:

Everyone is wrong...wrong wrong again...Except the jerkoff Markie.
Damn boy, wake up and smell the roses.

when someome lies about what I said I call em you too if needed

and you are a self confessed hate filled bigot who claims anyone he
does like saying the same things as he does hates Ham radio

Dan/W4NTI


but then you are such an easy target

I don't run around on a DAILY BASIS and ROUTINLY accuse people of being
liars, bigots, hate mongers, etc. Oh and tell the FBI to go find
Kennedy's killer. Do something useful.

BWAHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAaa

Dan/W4NTI

He offered the FBI head.

Scorecard on WT Docket 05-235
 

Steveo wrote:
"Dan/W4NTI" wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 01:37:17 GMT, "Dan/W4NTI"
wrote:

Everyone is wrong...wrong wrong again...Except the jerkoff Markie.
Damn boy, wake up and smell the roses.

when someome lies about what I said I call em you too if needed

and you are a self confessed hate filled bigot who claims anyone he
does like saying the same things as he does hates Ham radio

Dan/W4NTI


but then you are such an easy target

I don't run around on a DAILY BASIS and ROUTINLY accuse people of being
liars, bigots, hate mongers, etc. Oh and tell the FBI to go find
Kennedy's killer. Do something useful.

BWAHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAaa

Dan/W4NTI

He offered the FBI head.

guess you missed it the agent is female