Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bash tests published
Bill Sohl wrote:
wrote in message ups.com... wrote: wrote: wrote: Dick Bash disagreed with you then and he disagrees with you now. How? Dick Bash did not see the actual exams except by taking them. Then he published them. And FCC did nothing about it. Some in the FCC wanted to prosecute, but the higher ups didn't allow it. Phil Kane has told about it first-hand - he was working in the office where Bash did his thing at the time. The only thing that can be derive or concluded from that is the probable fact that there was disagreement within the FCC as to the ability to pursue and win any case against Bash. Or any of the other reasons. All it takes is one! Whether Bash broke the letter of the law or not isn't clear, but it *is* clear that he broke the spirit of the law. I never met anyone convicted of breaking the spirit of any law. BINGO!!! There's also "innocent until proven guilty". The other issue that would be in play is the legality of the law itself on constitutional grounds. Possibly, but I find it hard to believe that the FCC would have lost on those grounds. Doing so would set a precedent that *no* license exam contents could be kept out of the public view. Still, FCC may have thought it better not to take that chance. If, back then, FCC had thought it was OK for people to see the actual exams, they would have been published (as they are now) rather than going through the additional work of making up study guides. That's in your opinion anyway. It's also common sense. FCC made up study guides consisting of essay questions that indicated the general areas of knowledge that would be on the test. Those guides were published - ARRL reproduced them in their License Manuals (they specifically mention that fact in the Manual). Why would FCC go through the trouble to make up those guides if it were OK for non-FCC people to see the actual exam? Still, unless there existed specific regulations about divulging and publishing the exam contents, FCC's case agains Bash might have been very weak. The Commercial license was still more difficult than the amateur...NOT because I took any, but because the Commercial license covered a LOT more EM territory, a LOT more modes in Commercial radio then. But you don't really know because you didn't take both. Some of those who *did* take both say the Extra written was "harder". It's important that you should work harder for a hobby endeavor than for a commercial endeavor. Wasn't too hard for a 16 year old between 10th and 11th grade. In fact, I'd have gotten it more than a year earlier except for the 2 year waiting period. "The Man" still keeping you down? Not at all. Experience was part of the requirement back then. It was and is a good idea. I really have no problem with an experience criteria (e.g.a time interval between General and Extra). Nor I, but it would make more work for FCC. Right now anyone can go from any license class or no license at all to Extra in one exam session. An experience requirement would mean that many hams would need at least two exam sessions and two FCC paperwork cycles to get to Extra. More admin work = not something FCC would like. Cheers and Happy Thanksgiving to all, I thank the Lord for all the great and wonderful people and things in my life. Well said, Bill! I wish the same to all this fine day. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Bash tests published
Reposted for the guys in the Pirate Radio groups.
wrote in message ups.com... Bill Sohl wrote: wrote in message ups.com... wrote: wrote: wrote: Dick Bash disagreed with you then and he disagrees with you now. How? Dick Bash did not see the actual exams except by taking them. Then he published them. And FCC did nothing about it. Some in the FCC wanted to prosecute, but the higher ups didn't allow it. Phil Kane has told about it first-hand - he was working in the office where Bash did his thing at the time. The only thing that can be derive or concluded from that is the probable fact that there was disagreement within the FCC as to the ability to pursue and win any case against Bash. Or any of the other reasons. All it takes is one! Whether Bash broke the letter of the law or not isn't clear, but it *is* clear that he broke the spirit of the law. I never met anyone convicted of breaking the spirit of any law. BINGO!!! There's also "innocent until proven guilty". The other issue that would be in play is the legality of the law itself on constitutional grounds. Possibly, but I find it hard to believe that the FCC would have lost on those grounds. Doing so would set a precedent that *no* license exam contents could be kept out of the public view. Still, FCC may have thought it better not to take that chance. If, back then, FCC had thought it was OK for people to see the actual exams, they would have been published (as they are now) rather than going through the additional work of making up study guides. That's in your opinion anyway. It's also common sense. FCC made up study guides consisting of essay questions that indicated the general areas of knowledge that would be on the test. Those guides were published - ARRL reproduced them in their License Manuals (they specifically mention that fact in the Manual). Why would FCC go through the trouble to make up those guides if it were OK for non-FCC people to see the actual exam? Still, unless there existed specific regulations about divulging and publishing the exam contents, FCC's case agains Bash might have been very weak. The Commercial license was still more difficult than the amateur...NOT because I took any, but because the Commercial license covered a LOT more EM territory, a LOT more modes in Commercial radio then. But you don't really know because you didn't take both. Some of those who *did* take both say the Extra written was "harder". It's important that you should work harder for a hobby endeavor than for a commercial endeavor. Wasn't too hard for a 16 year old between 10th and 11th grade. In fact, I'd have gotten it more than a year earlier except for the 2 year waiting period. "The Man" still keeping you down? Not at all. Experience was part of the requirement back then. It was and is a good idea. I really have no problem with an experience criteria (e.g.a time interval between General and Extra). Nor I, but it would make more work for FCC. Right now anyone can go from any license class or no license at all to Extra in one exam session. An experience requirement would mean that many hams would need at least two exam sessions and two FCC paperwork cycles to get to Extra. More admin work = not something FCC would like. Cheers and Happy Thanksgiving to all, I thank the Lord for all the great and wonderful people and things in my life. Well said, Bill! I wish the same to all this fine day. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Bash tests published
Unlicensed Community Radio wrote:
Reposted for the guys in the Pirate Radio groups. I guess the guys in the pirate radio groups too stupid to read it here. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Experiance interval for Extra
wrote in message ups.com... Bill Sohl wrote: I really have no problem with an experience criteria (e.g.a time interval between General and Extra). Nor I, but it would make more work for FCC. Right now anyone can go from any license class or no license at all to Extra in one exam session. An experience requirement would mean that many hams would need at least two exam sessions and two FCC paperwork cycles to get to Extra. More admin work = not something FCC would like. Any idea what percent of people actually pass both the General and the Extra in one session? I suspect the number is relatively small. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Experiance interval for Extra
Bill Sohl wrote:
wrote in message ups.com... Bill Sohl wrote: I really have no problem with an experience criteria (e.g.a time interval between General and Extra). Nor I, but it would make more work for FCC. Right now anyone can go from any license class or no license at all to Extra in one exam session. An experience requirement would mean that many hams would need at least two exam sessions and two FCC paperwork cycles to get to Extra. More admin work = not something FCC would like. Any idea what percent of people actually pass both the General and the Extra in one session? Probably a considerable number. The number of Generals is pretty stable while the number of Extras just keeps growing. Note too that for one VE fee you get one chance at every element you haven't already passed. If someone goes to a VE session for General, there's no harm or cost (except time) if they try the Extra while they're at it. I've known more than a few hams who went to a VE session intending on the General and who came home with an Extra. Not a new thing, either. Way back in 1968, when I went to the FCC office at 2nd & Chestnut to take the General, the examiner suggested that I try the Advanced while I was there. No additional cost and since I had the General in the bag, it would actually save him some work in the future. A 14-year-old with any sense at all did not say "no" to The Man, so I tried the Advanced written, and passed. I suspect the number is relatively small. Check the AH0A site under "new licenses". While most hams start out as Techs, every month a small but not negligible number go straight to General or Extra. Regardless of the number, I doubt FCC would bring back the experience requirement after 30 years without one. Particularly since they'd have to enforce it. 73 es HT de Jim, N2EY |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Experiance interval for Extra
wrote in message ups.com... Bill Sohl wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Bill Sohl wrote: I really have no problem with an experience criteria (e.g.a time interval between General and Extra). Nor I, but it would make more work for FCC. Right now anyone can go from any license class or no license at all to Extra in one exam session. An experience requirement would mean that many hams would need at least two exam sessions and two FCC paperwork cycles to get to Extra. More admin work = not something FCC would like. Any idea what percent of people actually pass both the General and the Extra in one session? Probably a considerable number. The number of Generals is pretty stable while the number of Extras just keeps growing. Note too that for one VE fee you get one chance at every element you haven't already passed. If someone goes to a VE session for General, there's no harm or cost (except time) if they try the Extra while they're at it. I've known more than a few hams who went to a VE session intending on the General and who came home with an Extra. Not a new thing, either. Way back in 1968, when I went to the FCC office at 2nd & Chestnut to take the General, the examiner suggested that I try the Advanced while I was there. No additional cost and since I had the General in the bag, it would actually save him some work in the future. A 14-year-old with any sense at all did not say "no" to The Man, so I tried the Advanced written, and passed. I suspect the number is relatively small. Check the AH0A site under "new licenses". While most hams start out as Techs, every month a small but not negligible number go straight to General or Extra. That's my question, how small is that number? Also, the AH0A site doesn't truly indicate if someone went immediately from Tech to Extra at the same VE session so the ability to determine how many did so via AH0A stats isn't accurate. Regardless of the number, I doubt FCC would bring back the experience requirement after 30 years without one. Particularly since they'd have to enforce it. What's to enforce? All it comes down to is license issuing. Seems all the FCC need do is not allow the upgrade unless the applicant has 'N' years of elapsed time since getting their General. The FCC database system could automatically withhold issuing the Extra unless the time interval is elapsed. It could even be automatic so the person might pass their Extra at some point and the FCC system having been notified of the person passing Extra would then be updated and at the elapsed time interval, the FCC could then automatically issue the Extra upgrade. Just some basic software application reprograming as I see it. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Experiance interval for Extra
"Bill Sohl" wrote in message nk.net... wrote in message ups.com... Bill Sohl wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Bill Sohl wrote: I really have no problem with an experience criteria (e.g.a time interval between General and Extra). Nor I, but it would make more work for FCC. Right now anyone can go from any license class or no license at all to Extra in one exam session. An experience requirement would mean that many hams would need at least two exam sessions and two FCC paperwork cycles to get to Extra. More admin work = not something FCC would like. Any idea what percent of people actually pass both the General and the Extra in one session? Probably a considerable number. The number of Generals is pretty stable while the number of Extras just keeps growing. Note too that for one VE fee you get one chance at every element you haven't already passed. If someone goes to a VE session for General, there's no harm or cost (except time) if they try the Extra while they're at it. I've known more than a few hams who went to a VE session intending on the General and who came home with an Extra. Not a new thing, either. Way back in 1968, when I went to the FCC office at 2nd & Chestnut to take the General, the examiner suggested that I try the Advanced while I was there. No additional cost and since I had the General in the bag, it would actually save him some work in the future. A 14-year-old with any sense at all did not say "no" to The Man, so I tried the Advanced written, and passed. I suspect the number is relatively small. Check the AH0A site under "new licenses". While most hams start out as Techs, every month a small but not negligible number go straight to General or Extra. That's my question, how small is that number? Also, the AH0A site doesn't truly indicate if someone went immediately from Tech to Extra at the same VE session so the ability to determine how many did so via AH0A stats isn't accurate. Regardless of the number, I doubt FCC would bring back the experience requirement after 30 years without one. Particularly since they'd have to enforce it. What's to enforce? All it comes down to is license issuing. Seems all the FCC need do is not allow the upgrade unless the applicant has 'N' years of elapsed time since getting their General. The FCC database system could automatically withhold issuing the Extra unless the time interval is elapsed. It could even be automatic so the person might pass their Extra at some point and the FCC system having been notified of the person passing Extra would then be updated and at the elapsed time interval, the FCC could then automatically issue the Extra upgrade. Just some basic software application reprograming as I see it. Cheers, Bill K2UNK That would not work, because of the rampant corruption in the FCC & ARRL. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Experiance interval for Extra
Bill Sohl wrote:
wrote in message ups.com... Bill Sohl wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Bill Sohl wrote: I really have no problem with an experience criteria (e.g.a time interval between General and Extra). Nor I, but it would make more work for FCC. Right now anyone can go from any license class or no license at all to Extra in one exam session. An experience requirement would mean that many hams would need at least two exam sessions and two FCC paperwork cycles to get to Extra. More admin work = not something FCC would like. Any idea what percent of people actually pass both the General and the Extra in one session? Probably a considerable number. The number of Generals is pretty stable while the number of Extras just keeps growing. Note too that for one VE fee you get one chance at every element you haven't already passed. If someone goes to a VE session for General, there's no harm or cost (except time) if they try the Extra while they're at it. I've known more than a few hams who went to a VE session intending on the General and who came home with an Extra. Not a new thing, either. Way back in 1968, when I went to the FCC office at 2nd & Chestnut to take the General, the examiner suggested that I try the Advanced while I was there. No additional cost and since I had the General in the bag, it would actually save him some work in the future. A 14-year-old with any sense at all did not say "no" to The Man, so I tried the Advanced written, and passed. I suspect the number is relatively small. Check the AH0A site under "new licenses". While most hams start out as Techs, every month a small but not negligible number go straight to General or Extra. That's my question, how small is that number? Also, the AH0A site doesn't truly indicate if someone went immediately from Tech to Extra at the same VE session so the ability to determine how many did so via AH0A stats isn't accurate It's impossible to accurately determine *upgrades* from AH0A's numbers. An upgrade is classed as a modification, same as an address or name change. But if you look at the number of new licenses, it's clear that at least some new hams bypass Tech and go straight for General or Extra. AH0A's numbers only count as "new" licenses where the licensee was not in the database at all during the previous month. Of course some "new" licenses are actually "retread" hams, who let their licenses lapse for whatever reason and now are back. Regardless of the number, I doubt FCC would bring back the experience requirement after 30 years without one. Particularly since they'd have to enforce it. What's to enforce? All it comes down to is license issuing. Seems all the FCC need do is not allow the upgrade unless the applicant has 'N' years of elapsed time since getting their General. The FCC database system could automatically withhold issuing the Extra unless the time interval is elapsed. It could even be automatic so the person might pass their Extra at some point and the FCC system having been notified of the person passing Extra would then be updated and at the elapsed time interval, the FCC could then automatically issue the Extra upgrade. Just some basic software application reprograming as I see it. Actually the enforcement would fall upon the VEs anyway. They'd be required to only give the Extra test to those who could show a General or Advanced license that had been issued at least X amount of time previously. Form 605 could be changed so that you'd have to indicate the effective date of the General, etc. So it really wouldn't be an FCC enforcement thing at all. OTOH, it would increase FCC admin work slightly because they'd have more upgrades to process. The big hurdle would be selling FCC on the idea that an experience requirement is needed, after 30 years without one. That selling job would rival convincing them that a 5 wpm code test is still needed.......;-) 73 de Jim, N2EY Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Experiance interval for Extra
FCC & ARRL partners in the Culture of Corruption
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Experiance interval for Extra
wrote in message ups.com... Bill Sohl wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Bill Sohl wrote: wrote in message ups.com... Bill Sohl wrote: I really have no problem with an experience criteria (e.g.a time interval between General and Extra). Nor I, but it would make more work for FCC. Right now anyone can go from any license class or no license at all to Extra in one exam session. An experience requirement would mean that many hams would need at least two exam sessions and two FCC paperwork cycles to get to Extra. More admin work = not something FCC would like. Any idea what percent of people actually pass both the General and the Extra in one session? Probably a considerable number. The number of Generals is pretty stable while the number of Extras just keeps growing. Note too that for one VE fee you get one chance at every element you haven't already passed. If someone goes to a VE session for General, there's no harm or cost (except time) if they try the Extra while they're at it. I've known more than a few hams who went to a VE session intending on the General and who came home with an Extra. Not a new thing, either. Way back in 1968, when I went to the FCC office at 2nd & Chestnut to take the General, the examiner suggested that I try the Advanced while I was there. No additional cost and since I had the General in the bag, it would actually save him some work in the future. A 14-year-old with any sense at all did not say "no" to The Man, so I tried the Advanced written, and passed. I suspect the number is relatively small. Check the AH0A site under "new licenses". While most hams start out as Techs, every month a small but not negligible number go straight to General or Extra. That's my question, how small is that number? Also, the AH0A site doesn't truly indicate if someone went immediately from Tech to Extra at the same VE session so the ability to determine how many did so via AH0A stats isn't accurate It's impossible to accurately determine *upgrades* from AH0A's numbers. An upgrade is classed as a modification, same as an address or name change. But if you look at the number of new licenses, it's clear that at least some new hams bypass Tech and go straight for General or Extra. AH0A's numbers only count as "new" licenses where the licensee was not in the database at all during the previous month. Of course some "new" licenses are actually "retread" hams, who let their licenses lapse for whatever reason and now are back. Regardless of the number, I doubt FCC would bring back the experience requirement after 30 years without one. Particularly since they'd have to enforce it. What's to enforce? All it comes down to is license issuing. Seems all the FCC need do is not allow the upgrade unless the applicant has 'N' years of elapsed time since getting their General. The FCC database system could automatically withhold issuing the Extra unless the time interval is elapsed. It could even be automatic so the person might pass their Extra at some point and the FCC system having been notified of the person passing Extra would then be updated and at the elapsed time interval, the FCC could then automatically issue the Extra upgrade. Just some basic software application reprograming as I see it. Actually the enforcement would fall upon the VEs anyway. They'd be required to only give the Extra test to those who could show a General or Advanced license that had been issued at least X amount of time previously. Form 605 could be changed so that you'd have to indicate the effective date of the General, etc. Why should an applicant be prohibited from taking and passing the test? The time interval should be limiting the actual license issuance...not serve as a roadblock to taking the test at any time. So it really wouldn't be an FCC enforcement thing at all. OTOH, it would increase FCC admin work slightly because they'd have more upgrades to process. The big hurdle would be selling FCC on the idea that an experience requirement is needed, after 30 years without one. That selling job would rival convincing them that a 5 wpm code test is still needed.......;-) We'll likly never know :-) Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Utillity freq List; | Shortwave | |||
DX test Results | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
DX test Results | Broadcasting | |||
DX test Results | Shortwave |