Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: Dave Heil on Nov 20, 9:25 am
wrote: From: Dave Heil on Nov 18, 6:11 pm wrote: From: K4YZ on Nov 17, 7:15 pm wrote: Dave Heil wrote: You're the oldest fart here, Len and you aren't involved in amateur radio. Like I said, you have a fetish. You mean LICENSED amateur radio...as in having an HF transceiver and "working DX on HF with CW." :-) I made no excuses and you weren't involved in my work any more than you are involved in amateur radio. "Not involved with your [Department of State] work?" Not in the 1980s. I was involved in the 1950s. "State" had their own TTY nodes in the ACAN-STARCOM-DCS worldwide in the 1950s and 1960s. Would you like to know the node letters found on all messages that were relayed by the Army? I have a nice list. There's also one at the USAER website which covers Army in Europe history extensively. "State" never used an RCA Corporation RACES (Random Access Card Extract System) archival memory storage machine? On the contrary, "State" had two of them in Washingdon DC as prime electronic back-up. Back in the late 1960s. I know because I worked at the RCA division that made them and I got in on some of their final testing. Department of State used those to keep track of a months' worth of messages into/out of DC. You told me they were of no consequence. :-) I'm not involved in the operation of LICENSED amateur radio on-the-air. I can and have helped other amateurs fix/align their radio equipment. However, you want to dismiss a great big hobby area involving not just radio but all of electronics in the United States. Unpaid work. In a hobby. That's were I am. In other words, you're a non-factor in either. Tsk, tsk, I'm closer to a Mersene number insofar as factors are concerned! BSEG You've been recycling here too. You've certainly gotten mileage out of your irrelevant military experiences of better than half a century ago. 1. The U.S. military gave up using morse code modes for long-haul HF communications in 1948, longer than a half century ago. Plain, simple fact. Bugs the hell out of devout Believers in the Church of St. Hiram, so I bring it up. :-) 2. I've mentioned a considerable amount of civilian programs I've worked on in the last 49 years. Interestingly, there's more "sensitivity" on that than on old military activities due to Trade Secrets, Corporate Confidential, and general Non- Disclosure demands. Unless I have press release or other public information on that, I don't even mention them. 3. Before the advent of communications satellites, wideband fiber optic cable, improved underwater cable, the U.S. military depended primarily on HF radio for their worldwide communications networks. That HF network equipment operated by the very same laws of physics which governed amateur radio then and now. Technology transfer was directly applicable between the military of that time and amateur radio of that time. However, military radio then (and still does) employ more modes and techniques than are allowed by U.S.radio amateurs now. Did you know that both Tech classes together constitute almost HALF of all U.S. amateur radio license grants? True! Yep, when something is simple enough, many folks will opt for it rather than attempting that which is more difficult. Many never go beyond the easiest license despite the limited privileges it offers. Such as long-time amateur radiotelegraphers who've never ventured behind the front panels of their radios in order to understand how they worked. :-) Yes, I am familiar with those. Their "radio skill" never goes beyond their key, their ears, or the "official" jargon they've picked up from older days, those used by older "radio experts." Vic Clark was a silent key before I entered the Foreign Service. Not my fault. shrug I've met lots of notable people while in the Foreign Service--a U.S. President, his wife, two Secretaries of State, a number of U.S. Congressmen and Senators, former Finnish President Mauno Koivisto, Forumula 1 driver Mika Salo and even trumpeter Clark Terry among others. I got to see a number of other people of note--Secretary of State George Schultz, Boris Yeltsin. Wow! All because you worked for the Department of State? Who wrote "I've met people like you, always bragging about..." What has all that name-dropping to do with amateur radio? :-) Hmmm...I could do the same schtick with some show business folks, some high up, some not well known, lots of behind the scenes guild people, plus a couple of big corporation founders, three federal representatives (Barry Goldwater's son, once on politics, the other on a visit to RCA EASD in Van Nuys about the time his district was gerrymandered out of my area). I was quite taken with meeting Stockard Channing briefly during a party in the Hollywood Hills, she is tinier in real life than in reel life and is charming without needing a script. [Stockard was in "West Wing" as a semi-regular, is now on another show about doctors] I've not met any Heads of State. Few get involved in the nittygritty of aerospace. Representative Goldwater did but then he was bigger on flying and piloting than his father. The late General Bernard Shriever, USAF Missle Command (or whatever its final name was) attended a briefing I gave and we had a chat afterwards. Impressed me as having the "right stuff." John Young and Bob Crippen were at Rocketdyne, meeting and greeting the folks there who made the Space Shuttle Main Engines (shuttle space- frame was made "over the hill" at the B-1 Division). That right after the first space flight of the STS; they also were the crew of the air-drop-only Enterprise test shuttle. Your name didn't come up. Tsk. It [Newington] isn't even the center of the hamiverse. Actually, in this country, it is the closest thing we've got. Only in your perception. What nightly footsteps are in evidence and why would they be yellow? Inquire of REAL USMC veterans about "yellow footsteps." You haven't been following the expose' of the self-renowned Amateur Extra now dubbed Dudly the Imposter. Sorry, lil Davie, but there was a "comment march" on Washington. 3,786 filings worth on WT Docket 05-235. What, pray tell, is a "comment march". On alliterations you seem illiterate. There was no human parade march on Washington in regards to amateur radio. There were (to date) 3,786 filings on WT Docket 05-235, that Docket devoted to only one subject, the elimination or retention of the morse code test in federal amateur radio regulations. It's been only four months since the release of NPRM 05-143 (on July 19, 2005) but in the 11 month official period of WT Docket 98-143 on Restructuring, that garnered only about 2200 filings. The anti-code-test movement is gaining momentum. Not to the tune of 3,786 filings on 05-235, it isn't. See preceding. You aren't wrapped very tight. True, I am (at time of writing) sitting in shirtsleeves, the office window open, temperature gauge at the corner of the radio clock displaying 71.3 degrees F. If you mean that remark as an insult, then it has fallen flat before the message got here. Please do not litter. Would you care to see your own special profile again? Do whatever you like. The "profiles" generated by Miccolis are not official, not accurate, are biased to an extreme due to past differences in here and my not obliging him with the respect and reverence he thinks is so richly deserving. "Profiles" work two ways, indeed in many ways. Yours can, and has been done (in part) several times. I've been paid as a musician. Union or scab? [wanna see my AFTRA card? :-) ] Were you an actor portraying a musician? :-) American Federation of Television and Radio Artists. Question reiterated: Were YOU ever in a musician's guild, union, or craft? What's your point? Amateurs at anything, aren't paid. They do things for the love of doing them. Then why do YOU insist that all radio amateurs "love" the specific things YOU "love?" Your motivation is at question there. Does Palomar know about you? Does Schmidt help you? I'll let you think some more about another question you did not answer... :-) No, I don't think you need anything additional to brag about, Len. Davie, baby, "it ain't braggin' if ya DONE it. I done it." Then you don't have a "braq quotionent", Len. You have an "I DONE it quotionent", except that when it comes to amateur radio, you ain't done it. I have not obtained any amateur radio license, true, but to attempt semi-insult at claiming I've never been IN radio would be a disasterous fabrication for you on the order of Dudly the Imposter level. Remember who used that Dizzy Dean misquote in here first? The quote has been attributed to a number of people over the years. The one who USED it first in here was James P. Miccolis, license N2EY. ["Used," Davie, not 'attributed to'] Tsk, that misquote wound up blowing his words off... I didn't write about anything particularly new, Len. All readers here realize that...do not state the obvious. I asked about the things you are unable to do. For what reason? To attempt more denigrations? I had been attempting to levitate. Then I tried to invent anti- gravity. No success. Something is holding me down... Some of your stuff defies response. Try to stay with the program. We all know you have difficulties with analogies, please do not state the obvious. You poor, ignored blighter. You're still standing out in the cold and looking in. I guess you showed us. Sorry, you're thinking of Val Germann. He's been an unmodified Tech for over three years. [my micro-fiber jacket isn't tattered, you've got the wrong guy...] It couldn't have been Val, Leonard. He's a licensed ham. He is permitted full voting membership in the old lodge. In the NAAR, if he is a member there. The Commission doesn't have "voting" or "membership" through license granting...it just grants licenses and regulates all civil radio in the United States. The NAAR (old name ARRL, but NAAR seems to be the new name used by Imlay in Comments) membership is only 1 in 5 of all United States amateur radio licenses. Just how big is that "lodge hall" you tried to write about? I was hangin' with some NBC West Coast Hq types at lunch. We weren't talking about hamme raddddio. No doubt. They probably weren't even discussing ham radio. You DO have such difficulty with the written word, don't you? Tsk, tsk. Work on comprehension rather that strict, obedient literalism. This isn't an English Composition high school class. Ever hear of Phil Amidon? He retired from NBC West Coast Headquarters years ago. He'd already started a small business selling iron powder toroid cores and other little kits on sale in many radio-electronics parts stores nationwide. Bigger corporation bought his company. Irrelevant. Only to your extreme literalism. Tsk, tsk. Relax, learn to live with things. It will be better for you now that you are over the middle aged hill. As a matter of fact, Leonard, I've been watching HDTV for better than the past two years. Get your enjoyment where you can. For watching TV, you're an insider. For amateur radio, you're an outsider. Yep, extreme literalism. "Back of the bus" kind of bigotry. Were you born with that elitist attitude? Or was it acquired in "the foreign service?" :-) Tell me, do you hang around VE exam sessions, questioning those who enter the door whether they are "upgrading" or are newbies? Do you act like a Dill sergeant with the newbies? Chew them out, don't permit them to speak until spoken to? I get the distinct feeling you do that. :-) By the way, I've actually been watching HDTV, the present system in the regulations, since SIX years ago. Since a demonstration by the "Grand Alliance" group on the west coast. I've seen "HD" systems demonstrated much earlier, but those were not picked up in the FCC regulations. I worked a few Europeans and some South Americans last night on 160m CW, Len. I did some testing of a 6m FM link to an area 70cm repeater last evening with W8MSD and I squeezed in some HDTV viewing of college football. You do as you can and I'll do as I choose. Ohm my! I now get to actually CHOOSE FOR MYSELF?!? Oh heavenly day, the "Godfather" has allowed me a choice! I cannot refuse it! :-) Your stuff died with Vaudeville. Vaudeville isn't "dead," Godfather. It isn't healthy but you can find it still going strong in the Catskills. Nu? Vaudeville is alive and well but musclebound in the World Wrestling Federation. Morse code is alive but unwell, dwelling only in the musculeminds of stubborn, hidebound, self-righteous old and middle-aged morsemen bound and determined to force the code test down newcomer's throats until their code keys are pried out of cold, dead fingers. Actually, Len, statistics say that I should be at least a couple of decades from being done. Let's say this: You sure as hell aren't rare or medium! But you sure aren't well done either. "Steak tartare." :-) Reflect on the old saying, "there are lies, damn lies, and statistics." All are connected as equals. :-) I will be reading your SK notice in the ARRL/NAAR newsletter. I will think back on you then. Buy. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Power Industry BPL Reply Comments & Press Release | Antenna | |||
Power Industry BPL Reply Comments & Press Release | Antenna | |||
BPL pollution - file reply comments by August 6 | Antenna | |||
BPL pollution – file reply comments by August 6 | Antenna | |||
BPL interference - reply comments - YOUR ACTION REQUIRED | Antenna |