On 15 Jan 2006 13:01:20 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 00:40:41 GMT, Dave Heil
cut

But I lack a sense shame compatable with your understanding

It isn't at all past my understanding, Mark.

You were mis-wired in a
number of ways.

there you go sating you opinion as fact, therby lying

He didn't mis-state anything.

yes he did

You're nuts.
your opinion
You've admitted you're nuts.

you lie

I could say you are miswired but that is subtituting my juedgement for
facts

No, it would be expressing an opinon that didn't meet the test of
evidence to the contrary.

no eveidence that that dave is correctly wired

he claims to christain and violates the word of god

that looks like miswirde to me

what you are seeking to do is impose your view on others

And you're NOT...?!?!

no I am not
cut your whining
You not only want to shove your poorly framed ideas down other's
throats, you want them to pay you to do it.

toal lie on your part

You have no grasp of societal mores.

I grasp them better than you in some cases

Uhhhhhhhhhhhh....No.

yes

you seem to think that words like "####" are not used comonly in
soceiety

No one said they weren't.

you did for one

We just said they are not used in PROPER society.

now you are back pedaling

but even with that cavate what has that to do with RRAP

prehaps in some rural backwater like you live that is the case (but I
doubt it) but not in the real wolrd

More like some up-country backwater penninsula town where noone is
anyone and no one cares.

I hear the same langaus In Houghton in Green Bay in Milwakee and
Chicago


I the only days I don't hear the at least one the word "**** damn or
**** or the variants like ****ing etc, is a day I don't leave the
house.

more cesorship from steve

You got that backwards, as usual.

nope I have it right on



the FCC itself agree that in some contexts that #### and ####ing
could be used on braodcast TV in primetime (they recanted but they
still made the ruling)

They recanted because there was a furor raised by dozens of parent
organizations that don't want thier kids being raised with
gutter-mouths.

I said they reacanted but the matter was such that they made the
ruling in the first place, meaning the usage is not as far beyond the
pale as you claim


You're a misfit.

You'd have to be capable of being shamed and
there really isn't much evidence of that.

you meed to learn that you do not get to decide the stadards by which
hothers live

I don't even know *where* hothers live.

clearly you don't

Clearly you don't understand what Dave said.

how is that clear?

Society decides upon the
standards, Mark.

and in soceity lot of words get used that you don't that is how society
sets those standards

And in most civil settings, words like the ones you used above
don't get used because they are profane and unnecessary for effective
adult communication.

YMMV but not in my experence

That's why we have certain laws, certain conventions
of behavior.

your point

...is lost on you, Markie. It required a mature sense of
perception.

no it requires existing


You may live outside some of those laws and conventions,
but you'll likely be shunned by society.

your point

...is again lost on you. It required a mutual frame of reference.
Dave comes from a cultured, educated, and professional background.

no it seem he comes form a back woods hick background lacking any
real cultutre and that somehow he had a carrerin the world without
coming to understand it


You come from...Well...Lesser origins.

IYO


If you break certain of the
laws by which our society lives, they put you away.

none of wehich I have come cloase to

Sure you have.

obviously not steve

so I ask again your point

...is STILL lost on you...And now documented as yor third strike.
what is "yor"


You're out.
out of what?

You've been ridiculed

yes I have been riduled

I don't know about that, br

the lied you lied when typed "You've been ridiculed "

No, he did not lie.

yes he did

but you have been ridiculed.

Not by anyone here who could do it effectively.
well there is admission steve

you have just admitted that you are not effective at rediculing me
Lennie comes
close, but only because he can "usually" express himself without
profanity.
and len has no reason to redicule me

..But even he needs to drop to the gutter on frequent
occassion. For him it's a homecoming.

you stay in the guuter all the time

raped an old friend

mark moragn caught on tap
putz
so and is gay

so and so has aids

sosa nd has an STD


yes by you and Steve

so what?

you and steve do not contitute soceity as a whole thank god

We ridicule you because you make it easy to do.
but you just admitted that you can't do it make up your mind


And why are you thanking a diety that you don't believe in?
i am not thanking a deity I don't believe in

you have just told another lie

which acording to you is the most uncivl thing you can do

personaly I find calling some a child abuser or rapist ore uncivil but
then I am an intlegent human being unlike yourself

and
made to look foolish by others

no I haven't

Yes, you have.

no I have not

So frequently that it defies counting. But in the last 30 days
it's been about 1,000.

nope


You simply don't get it.

you simply and steve like picking on people. that is despeictable but
not much I do about it.

Oh NO, Markie, you do ALL about it! If it weren't FOR you, there'd
be nothing to do except discuss real radio stuff.

another lie

before I returned you were going on and on with lies about about Todd

you don't discuss radio here at all I doubt you ever discuss radio
much

indeed I don't think you can discuss radio


you have shown yourself a preaching bully many times

Perhaps you consider it "preaching" because the content makes you
feel guilty.
that would be a posiiblity
but no it isn't the case

I call it preaching becuase it the content is of someone trying to
assert that they have the power to tell someone else how to live


and you've made yourself look foolish.

not realy

Yes, really, but the 248 IQ doesn't get it.

no the 248 IQ see pasts the petty silly **** you are obseesed with I
see the larger view that is beyond your understanding clearly

Obvioulsy false.

no indeed you porve my point right there, but only to someone with a
working brain


If you saw the "larger view" you wouldn't have made such a fool
out of yourself over the last 30 days or so.

why do you say that?

I have efectively acomlished some of my goals

I have clearly shown you be a lying hypocrite

I have gotten(with BB's help) you to admit you are a control freak


The "248 IQ" (one of your bigger mistruths) obviously does not
possess the requisite skills to fully and competently express itself
without profanity.
how do you figure

It is such a problem to express anything at aleel you can understand

so yes I haev droped the leel to include profanity

if you and dave leave then I can suse adultlang again

Steve, K4YZ

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On 15 Jan 2006 13:01:20 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 00:40:41 GMT, Dave Heil
cut

But I lack a sense shame compatable with your understanding

It isn't at all past my understanding, Mark.

You were mis-wired in a
number of ways.

there you go sating you opinion as fact, therby lying

He didn't mis-state anything.

yes he did

No he didn't.

You're nuts.

your opinion

An observation and assessment.

You've admitted you're nuts.

you lie

Nope. You've acknowledged your placement in the mental health
system several times...For 'anger issues", remember...?!?!

I could say you are miswired but that is subtituting my juedgement for
facts

No, it would be expressing an opinon that didn't meet the test of
evidence to the contrary.

no eveidence that that dave is correctly wired

Sure there is.

He's a reknowned and internationally known Amateur Radio operator.

You're a documented pathological liar who's had more than one
run-in with law enforcement and the mental health system.

he claims to christain and violates the word of god

You claim to have an IQ of 248 yet can't seem to write in English
consistently.

that looks like miswirde to me

I am sure a lot of things look "miswirde" to you.

what you are seeking to do is impose your view on others

And you're NOT...?!?!

no I am not

Sure you are.

cut your whining

More censorship by the guy who claims he doesn't do it.

You not only want to shove your poorly framed ideas down other's
throats, you want them to pay you to do it.

toal lie on your part

Nope.

You have no grasp of societal mores.

I grasp them better than you in some cases

Uhhhhhhhhhhhh....No.

yes

Uhhhhhhhhhhh...NO.

you seem to think that words like "####" are not used comonly in
soceiety

No one said they weren't.

you did for one

No, I did not.

We just said they are not used in PROPER society.

now you are back pedaling

Nope.

but even with that cavate what has that to do with RRAP

"caveat".

prehaps in some rural backwater like you live that is the case (but I
doubt it) but not in the real wolrd

More like some up-country backwater penninsula town where noone is
anyone and no one cares.

I hear the same langaus In Houghton in Green Bay in Milwakee and
Chicago

I am sure you do. Considering who and what you are, I am sure the
circles you travel in are abundantly populated by people who are as
low-life and gutter-mouthed as you are, Markie.

I the only days I don't hear the at least one the word "#### damn or
#### or the variants like ####ing etc, is a day I don't leave the
house.

more cesorship from steve

Nope.

If YOU care to propagate such language under YOUR screen name
Markie, go right ahead...However I am under no obligation to re-state
your weakmindedness under mine.

You got that backwards, as usual.

nope I have it right on

No, you don't.

the FCC itself agree that in some contexts that #### and ####ing
could be used on braodcast TV in primetime (they recanted but they
still made the ruling)

They recanted because there was a furor raised by dozens of parent
organizations that don't want thier kids being raised with
gutter-mouths.

I said they reacanted but the matter was such that they made the
ruling in the first place, meaning the usage is not as far beyond the
pale as you claim

What?

You're a misfit.

You'd have to be capable of being shamed and
there really isn't much evidence of that.

you meed to learn that you do not get to decide the stadards by which
hothers live

I don't even know *where* hothers live.

clearly you don't

Clearly you don't understand what Dave said.

how is that clear?

Because your response perpetuates the concept of your ignorance.

Society decides upon the
standards, Mark.

and in soceity lot of words get used that you don't that is how society
sets those standards

And in most civil settings, words like the ones you used above
don't get used because they are profane and unnecessary for effective
adult communication.

YMMV but not in my experence

That's because in YOUR experience, you don't travel in circles
that expect any degree of maturity or refinement.

That's why we have certain laws, certain conventions
of behavior.

your point

...is lost on you, Markie. It required a mature sense of
perception.

no it requires existing

It requires that you have a mature sense. Yours is non-existant.

You may live outside some of those laws and conventions,
but you'll likely be shunned by society.

your point

...is again lost on you. It required a mutual frame of reference.
Dave comes from a cultured, educated, and professional background.

no it seem he comes form a back woods hick background lacking any
real cultutre and that somehow he had a carrerin the world without
coming to understand it

Yeah...Right.

That's how Dave managed to complete a very successful career in
the Foreign Service...by being a backwoods hick...sure..right..uh
huh......

You come from...Well...Lesser origins.

IYO

No..fact.

If you break certain of the
laws by which our society lives, they put you away.

none of wehich I have come cloase to

Sure you have.

obviously not steve

Obviously you have, Mark.

so I ask again your point

...is STILL lost on you...And now documented as yor third strike.

what is "yor"

"yor" is proof that your claims of "dyslexia" are a fraud.

You're out.

out of what?

Your mind.

You've been ridiculed

yes I have been riduled

I don't know about that, br

the lied you lied when typed "You've been ridiculed "

No, he did not lie.

yes he did

No, he did not.

but you have been ridiculed.

Not by anyone here who could do it effectively.

well there is admission steve

you have just admitted that you are not effective at rediculing me

Try re-reading the original context, Markie.

Lennie comes
close, but only because he can "usually" express himself without
profanity.

and len has no reason to redicule me

Sure he does!

Markie, you've NOT been paying attention to what Lennie
writes...YOU are the VERY ESSENCE of what Lennie HATES about Amateur
Radio! It's knowing that low-lifes like YOU can manage to pass the
tests for licensure that he doesn't want to associate with! YOU are
the unwashed masses that he considers himself too good to associate
with!

..But even he needs to drop to the gutter on frequent
occassion. For him it's a homecoming.

you stay in the guuter all the time

What's a guuter?

raped an old friend

I am sure you did.

mark moragn caught on tap

There's a beer called "mark moragn"...?!?!

putz

Yes, you are.

so and is gay

Huh?

so and so has aids

So and so has aids?

sosa nd has an STD

Sosa has an STD? The Sosa who plays baseball, or The Reverend
Bartholomew Sosa, the famous pro-abstinence Baptist minister...?!?!

yes by you and Steve

so what?

you and steve do not contitute soceity as a whole thank god

We ridicule you because you make it easy to do.

but you just admitted that you can't do it make up your mind

Your lack of comprehension and inability to follow the attributes
is classic.

And why are you thanking a diety that you don't believe in?

i am not thanking a deity I don't believe in

Sure you did.

you have just told another lie

Nope. It's documented right there.

You claim to be a pagan, yet are offering thanks to dieties that
don't exist in your world.

which acording to you is the most uncivl thing you can do

Re-read what was just written, blockhead.

personaly I find calling some a child abuser or rapist ore uncivil but
then I am an intlegent human being unlike yourself

"intlegent human being"

BBBWWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!

and
made to look foolish by others

no I haven't

Yes, you have.

no I have not

So frequently that it defies counting. But in the last 30 days
it's been about 1,000.

nope

Yep. Take a bow.

You simply don't get it.

you simply and steve like picking on people. that is despeictable but
not much I do about it.

Oh NO, Markie, you do ALL about it! If it weren't FOR you, there'd
be nothing to do except discuss real radio stuff.

another lie

Nope.

before I returned you were going on and on with lies about about Todd

But they weren't lies.

Toiddie STILL goes on-and-on about his broadcasts and his illegal
ultralight.

you don't discuss radio here at all I doubt you ever discuss radio
much

I tried.

You and three of your Feeble Five bretheren managed to deter that.

indeed I don't think you can discuss radio

I am surprised you can SPELL "radio".

And besides, Markie, YOU have already demonstrated that you can't
discuss radio stuff...You don't know the terminology and you are
unfamiliar with the rules. (Witness you recent flailings over the 60
meter band with Hans...)

you have shown yourself a preaching bully many times

Perhaps you consider it "preaching" because the content makes you
feel guilty.
that would be a posiiblity
but no it isn't the case

I call it preaching becuase it the content is of someone trying to
assert that they have the power to tell someone else how to live

He's not telling you how to live.

and you've made yourself look foolish.

not realy

Yes, really, but the 248 IQ doesn't get it.

no the 248 IQ see pasts the petty silly #### you are obseesed with I
see the larger view that is beyond your understanding clearly

Obvioulsy false.

no indeed you porve my point right there, but only to someone with a
working brain

Oh...that "porved" it...?!?!

If you saw the "larger view" you wouldn't have made such a fool
out of yourself over the last 30 days or so.

why do you say that?

Because it's true.

I have efectively acomlished some of my goals

Smacking yourself in the head over-and-over again with a "dumb###
stick" was one of your goals...?!?!

I have clearly shown you be a lying hypocrite

Uhhhhhhh...No, you've not.

I have gotten(with BB's help) you to admit you are a control freak

Uhhhhhhhhhhhh...no, you've not.

The "248 IQ" (one of your bigger mistruths) obviously does not
possess the requisite skills to fully and competently express itself
without profanity.

how do you figure

Re-read your posts of the last 30 days. It didn't require a
degree in rocket science.

It is such a problem to express anything at aleel you can understand

What's "aleel"...?!?!

so yes I haev droped the leel to include profanity

You dropped the leel? I guess it's not amde out of glass or
ceramic then.

if you and dave leave then I can suse adultlang again

Huh?

Markie, try using the ENGLISH language here, OK...?!?!

Steve, K4YZ

On 15 Jan 2006 14:03:49 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
On 15 Jan 2006 13:01:20 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 00:40:41 GMT, Dave Heil
cut

But I lack a sense shame compatable with your understanding

It isn't at all past my understanding, Mark.

You were mis-wired in a
number of ways.

there you go sating you opinion as fact, therby lying

He didn't mis-state anything.

yes he did

No he didn't.

yes he did

You're nuts.

your opinion

An observation and assessment.

a lie you have never observed me at all

You've admitted you're nuts.

you lie

Nope. You've acknowledged your placement in the mental health
system several times...For 'anger issues", remember...?!?!
no I have not

you have tried to spin things that way but I have adknowledge being
placed in the mental health system

nor would such placement be proof I were nuts

futher more I have never adknoeledged that i was "nuts"

so you lied somemore
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On 15 Jan 2006 14:03:49 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote:
On 15 Jan 2006 13:01:20 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 00:40:41 GMT, Dave Heil
cut

But I lack a sense shame compatable with your understanding

It isn't at all past my understanding, Mark.

You were mis-wired in a
number of ways.

there you go sating you opinion as fact, therby lying

He didn't mis-state anything.

yes he did

No he didn't.

yes he did

Why are you lying again, Markie?

You're nuts.

your opinion

An observation and assessment.

a lie you have never observed me at all

Sure I have. Over 1,000 posts in the last 30 days.

You've admitted you're nuts.

you lie

Nope. You've acknowledged your placement in the mental health
system several times...For 'anger issues", remember...?!?!
no I have not

you have tried to spin things that way but I have adknowledge being
placed in the mental health system

Sure you did.

You were under therapy for your "anger issues".

In-patient or out, you were IN the mental health system, like it
or not!

nor would such placement be proof I were nuts

Sure it would.

futher more I have never adknoeledged that i was "nuts"

Sure you have.

so you lied somemore

Nope.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
cut

An observation and assessment.

a lie you have never observed me at all

Sure I have. Over 1,000 posts in the last 30 days.

there you have steve claim he can me over the net

an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
cut

An observation and assessment.
a lie you have never observed me at all
Sure I have. Over 1,000 posts in the last 30 days.

there you have steve claim he can me over the net

Canned you? Caned you?

Dave K8MN

On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 04:49:28 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
cut

An observation and assessment.
a lie you have never observed me at all
Sure I have. Over 1,000 posts in the last 30 days.

there you have steve claim he can me over the net

Canned you? Caned you?

of you cut out the context I can't answer your questions without more
efofrt than it is worth

Dave K8MN

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 04:49:28 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
cut

An observation and assessment.
a lie you have never observed me at all
Sure I have. Over 1,000 posts in the last 30 days.

there you have steve claim he can me over the net

Canned you? Caned you?
that he can see me over the net you should have looked at the title

Dave K8MN

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On 15 Jan 2006 14:03:49 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:

wrote:
On 15 Jan 2006 13:01:20 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 00:40:41 GMT, Dave Heil
cut

But I lack a sense shame compatable with your understanding
It isn't at all past my understanding, Mark.
You were mis-wired in a
number of ways.
there you go sating you opinion as fact, therby lying
He didn't mis-state anything.
yes he did
No he didn't.

yes he did
You're nuts.
your opinion
An observation and assessment.

a lie you have never observed me at all
You've admitted you're nuts.
you lie
Nope. You've acknowledged your placement in the mental health
system several times...For 'anger issues", remember...?!?!

no I have not

you have tried to spin things that way but I have adknowledge being
placed in the mental health system

"Being placed" isn't the same as your having sought treatment is it, Mark?

nor would such placement be proof I were nuts

It is a really good indicator that you have some mental issues.

Dave K8MN

On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 05:03:12 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:
On 15 Jan 2006 14:03:49 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:

wrote:
On 15 Jan 2006 13:01:20 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 00:40:41 GMT, Dave Heil
cut

But I lack a sense shame compatable with your understanding
It isn't at all past my understanding, Mark.
You were mis-wired in a
number of ways.
there you go sating you opinion as fact, therby lying
He didn't mis-state anything.
yes he did
No he didn't.

yes he did
You're nuts.
your opinion
An observation and assessment.

a lie you have never observed me at all
You've admitted you're nuts.
you lie
Nope. You've acknowledged your placement in the mental health
system several times...For 'anger issues", remember...?!?!

no I have not

you have tried to spin things that way but I have not adknowledged being
placed in the mental health system

"Being placed" isn't the same as your having sought treatment is it, Mark?
no it isn't
indeed why you and steve want to make something of the fact that I
needed some conseuling over a divorce is beyond me

you and steve are one fo thereason people avoid seeing the mental
health people

nor would such placement be proof I were nuts

It is a really good indicator that you have some mental issues.

not realy not accrding thos ethat run the places


Dave K8MN

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account