Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #101   Report Post  
Old October 22nd 06, 07:36 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,554
Default ARS License Numbers


U-Know-Who wrote:
"Slow Code" wrote in message
news


Maybe now people will see dumbing down ham radio was a bad idea.

SC


Well, hopefully it really won't matter too much. I personally hope they take
your coveted HF bands for worldwide data communications, and outlaw HF ham
radio altogether.

such a negitve attaudte tom you are nothing but hate filled why don't
seek treament a few drugs and you will feel better

  #102   Report Post  
Old October 23rd 06, 12:39 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.amateur.misc
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default ARS License Numbers

"U-Know-Who" wrote in
:


"Slow Code" wrote in message
news
Thanks Jim,

Maybe now people will see dumbing down ham radio was a bad idea.

SC


Well, hopefully it really won't matter too much. I personally hope they
take your coveted HF bands for worldwide data communications, and outlaw
HF ham radio altogether. You can then hook your key up to a buzzer and
code yourself into the grave.

HTH



I'd rather hook my key to a cattle prod and teach your lazy ass some spark.

SC
  #103   Report Post  
Old November 6th 06, 11:07 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Default ARS License Numbers

These are the numbers of current, unexpired
amateur radio licenses held by individuals
on the stated dates, and the percentage of
the total number of active licenses that
class contains:

As of May 14, 2000:

Novice - 49,329 (7.3%)
Technician - 205,394 (30.4%)
Technician Plus - 128,860 (19.1%)
General - 112,677 (16.7%)
Advanced - 99,782 (14.8%)
Extra - 78,750 (11.7%)

Total Tech/TechPlus - 334,254 (49.5%)

Total General/Advanced/Extra - 291,209 (43.2%)

Total all classes - 674,792

As of November 1, 2006:

Novice - 24,154 (3.7%) [decrease of 25,175]
Technician - 287,444 (43.7%) [increase of 82,050]
Technician Plus - 34,786 (5.3%) [decrease of 94,074]
General - 131,994 (20.1%) [increase of 19,317]
Advanced - 70,607 (10.7%) [decrease of 29,175]
Extra - 108,563 (16.5%) [increase of 29,813]

(percentages may not add up to exactly 100.0% due to rounding)

Total Tech/TechPlus - 322,230 (49.0%) [decrease of 12,024]

Total General/Advanced/Extra - 311,164 (47.3%) [increase of 19,955]

Total all classes - 657,548 (decrease of 17,244)

Note that these totals do not include licenses
that have expired but are in the grace period.

They also do not include club, military
or other station-only licenses.

Note also that effective April 15, 2000, new
Novice, Technician Plus and Advanced licenses
are no longer issued.

Since April 15, 2000, FCC has renewed all existing
Technician Plus licenses as Technician. By May of
2010, the number of Technician Plus licenses will drop
to zero, because all of them will have been renewed as
Technician or allowed to expire. It is therefore
informative to consider the totals of the two classes,
since the Technician class includes a significant
number of Technician Plus licenses renewed as
Technician.

73 de Jim, N2EY

  #105   Report Post  
Old November 6th 06, 07:31 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 74
Default ARS License Numbers


wrote in message
oups.com...
wrote:

As of November 1, 2006:

Novice - 24,154 (3.7%) [decrease of 25,175]
Technician - 287,444 (43.7%) [increase of 82,050]
Technician Plus - 34,786 (5.3%) [decrease of 94,074]
General - 131,994 (20.1%) [increase of 19,317]
Advanced - 70,607 (10.7%) [decrease of 29,175]
Extra - 108,563 (16.5%) [increase of 29,813]


The point being that the Coded Amateurs are REALLY almost 60% of
the Amateur population when one figures in the Tech Plus folks who have
already been assimilated into the vanilla Technician.

Those are numbers that political appointees are impressed by.

Perhaps it's that simple math that prevents the FCC from
broadstroking the code test out of existence...?!?!

73

Steve, K4YZ


Hello Steve,

Bear in mind that only 10.7% are *known* to have passed 13 words per minute
(advanced).

I honestly expect that the FCC will likely eliminate code testing but as to
when, I haven't a clue.

There are also modes (PSK) that use *less* bandwidth than CW, although it
appears that voice seems to be the most popular. It would be nice to see
some expansion of the HF amateur bands, but a number of 3rd world countries
are relying on HF rather than satellite, so I'm not holding my breath LOL.


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA






  #106   Report Post  
Old November 6th 06, 11:20 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Default ARS License Numbers


Jim Hampton wrote:

Bear in mind that only 10.7% are *known* to have passed 13 words per minute
(advanced).


No, that's not known.

For about 10 years before the 2000 restructuring, (1990-2000), the
Advanced was available with only 5 wpm code if you had a medical
waiver.

It was also possible to get a "5 wpm Advanced" for about a year after
the 2000 restructuring, by the use of CSCEs.

So the possession of an Advanced license, by itself, is no more proof
of having passed 13 wpm than an Extra is proof of 20 wpm.

I honestly expect that the FCC will likely eliminate code testing but as to
when, I haven't a clue.


I'm surprised it's taken this long. Almost 3-1/2 years since the treaty
changed, and the rules are the same as six years ago.

There are also modes (PSK) that use *less* bandwidth than CW, although it
appears that voice seems to be the most popular.


Yup - they have their weaknesses and their strengths. More tools in the
toolbox.

It would be nice to see
some expansion of the HF amateur bands, but a number of 3rd world countries
are relying on HF rather than satellite, so I'm not holding my breath LOL.


The SWBC folks are moving out of 7100-7200 - that effectively widens
the 40 meter band.

73 de Jim, N2EY

  #107   Report Post  
Old November 6th 06, 11:30 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 618
Default ARS License Numbers


"Jim Hampton" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
wrote:

As of November 1, 2006:

Novice - 24,154 (3.7%) [decrease of 25,175]
Technician - 287,444 (43.7%) [increase of 82,050]
Technician Plus - 34,786 (5.3%) [decrease of 94,074]
General - 131,994 (20.1%) [increase of 19,317]
Advanced - 70,607 (10.7%) [decrease of 29,175]
Extra - 108,563 (16.5%) [increase of 29,813]


The point being that the Coded Amateurs are REALLY almost 60% of
the Amateur population when one figures in the Tech Plus folks who have
already been assimilated into the vanilla Technician.

Those are numbers that political appointees are impressed by.

Perhaps it's that simple math that prevents the FCC from
broadstroking the code test out of existence...?!?!

73

Steve, K4YZ


Hello Steve,

Bear in mind that only 10.7% are *known* to have passed 13 words per
minute
(advanced).


However, not quite correct. It just takes more digging into the database to
get that info. You can look up previous license class on any individual.
If an Extra's previous license shows as Advanced, you will then also *know*
that they passed the 13wpm. You can also look at the record and see if they
have upgraded since April 2000. If they held their General or Advanced
prior to then, you *know* that they passed the 13wpm. For Extras, you can
determine if they received their Extra before that date or not and *know*
that they passed the 20wpm. However, it's probably more effort than it is
worth to get that deep into the data.

As I understand the postings on license numbers, it is basically to see if
there has been any effect on the growth of amateur radio.

I honestly expect that the FCC will likely eliminate code testing but as
to
when, I haven't a clue.


I suspect that you are correct.


There are also modes (PSK) that use *less* bandwidth than CW, although it
appears that voice seems to be the most popular. It would be nice to see
some expansion of the HF amateur bands, but a number of 3rd world
countries
are relying on HF rather than satellite, so I'm not holding my breath LOL.


Bandwidth isn't the only parameter. Each mode has its strengths and
weaknesses.


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA


Dee, N8UZE


  #108   Report Post  
Old November 6th 06, 11:35 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 618
Default ARS License Numbers


wrote in message
ups.com...

Jim Hampton wrote:

Bear in mind that only 10.7% are *known* to have passed 13 words per
minute
(advanced).


No, that's not known.

For about 10 years before the 2000 restructuring, (1990-2000), the
Advanced was available with only 5 wpm code if you had a medical
waiver.

It was also possible to get a "5 wpm Advanced" for about a year after
the 2000 restructuring, by the use of CSCEs.

So the possession of an Advanced license, by itself, is no more proof
of having passed 13 wpm than an Extra is proof of 20 wpm.


I'd momentarily forgotten the waivers when I made my previous post. My
ex-husband had severe hearing problems (both loss of hearing and tinnitus).
He passed the 5wpm and had medical waivers for the 13wpm and 20wpm.

Dee, N8UZE


  #109   Report Post  
Old November 6th 06, 11:46 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,554
Default ARS License Numbers


Dee Flint wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

Jim Hampton wrote:

Bear in mind that only 10.7% are *known* to have passed 13 words per
minute
(advanced).


No, that's not known.

For about 10 years before the 2000 restructuring, (1990-2000), the
Advanced was available with only 5 wpm code if you had a medical
waiver.

It was also possible to get a "5 wpm Advanced" for about a year after
the 2000 restructuring, by the use of CSCEs.

So the possession of an Advanced license, by itself, is no more proof
of having passed 13 wpm than an Extra is proof of 20 wpm.


I'd momentarily forgotten the waivers when I made my previous post. My
ex-husband had severe hearing problems (both loss of hearing and tinnitus).
He passed the 5wpm and had medical waivers for the 13wpm and 20wpm.

Dee, N8UZE

which means BTW acording to most of your fellow ProCoders he wasn't a
real ham
althought the Nocoder like myself adknowledge that you use the rules as
they arte written

  #110   Report Post  
Old November 7th 06, 12:58 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default ARS License Numbers

wrote in
oups.com:

These are the numbers of current, unexpired
amateur radio licenses held by individuals
on the stated dates, and the percentage of
the total number of active licenses that
class contains:

As of May 14, 2000:

Novice - 49,329 (7.3%)
Technician - 205,394 (30.4%)
Technician Plus - 128,860 (19.1%)
General - 112,677 (16.7%)
Advanced - 99,782 (14.8%)
Extra - 78,750 (11.7%)

Total Tech/TechPlus - 334,254 (49.5%)

Total General/Advanced/Extra - 291,209 (43.2%)

Total all classes - 674,792

As of November 1, 2006:

Novice - 24,154 (3.7%) [decrease of 25,175]
Technician - 287,444 (43.7%) [increase of 82,050]
Technician Plus - 34,786 (5.3%) [decrease of 94,074]
General - 131,994 (20.1%) [increase of 19,317]
Advanced - 70,607 (10.7%) [decrease of 29,175]
Extra - 108,563 (16.5%) [increase of 29,813]

(percentages may not add up to exactly 100.0% due to rounding)

Total Tech/TechPlus - 322,230 (49.0%) [decrease of 12,024]

Total General/Advanced/Extra - 311,164 (47.3%) [increase of 19,955]

Total all classes - 657,548 (decrease of 17,244)

Note that these totals do not include licenses
that have expired but are in the grace period.

They also do not include club, military
or other station-only licenses.

Note also that effective April 15, 2000, new
Novice, Technician Plus and Advanced licenses
are no longer issued.

Since April 15, 2000, FCC has renewed all existing
Technician Plus licenses as Technician. By May of
2010, the number of Technician Plus licenses will drop
to zero, because all of them will have been renewed as
Technician or allowed to expire. It is therefore
informative to consider the totals of the two classes,
since the Technician class includes a significant
number of Technician Plus licenses renewed as
Technician.

73 de Jim, N2EY




Thanks for posting that Jim. Maybe now people will see dumbing down ham
radio was a bad idea.

SC

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? Bill Sohl Policy 254 December 31st 05 03:50 AM
Why not more young'uns in Ham radio Mike Coslo Policy 224 June 27th 05 07:50 PM
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 private General 0 May 10th 04 09:39 PM
ATTN: Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st Dwight Stewart Policy 300 August 12th 03 12:25 AM
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement Scott Unit 69 Policy 9 August 1st 03 02:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017