Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 20th 06, 03:27 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.swap
Ron
 
Posts: n/a
Default ARS License Numbers

I don't think any correlation exists between them and current behavior
on HF, which I assume, possibly incorrectly, that you are refering to.


The biggest idiots on 20m, for instance, are on 14275, both sides are
guilty, and I am quite sure that they all got their tickets with CW
required. And the problem stations on 75 are quite the same. Which
also proves nothing either way.



it does prove that CW testing is at best poor proof of screening out
bad ops



Yup if you check it out most of the crap on HF is from old farts that
passed their tests with the CW requirement.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? Bill Sohl Policy 254 December 31st 05 03:50 AM
Why not more young'uns in Ham radio Mike Coslo Policy 224 June 27th 05 07:50 PM
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 private General 0 May 10th 04 09:39 PM
ATTN: Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st Dwight Stewart Policy 300 August 12th 03 12:25 AM
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement Scott Unit 69 Policy 9 August 1st 03 02:08 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017