On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 10:29:28 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


He's one of us who is tired of clueless Usenet users. Next time post
something revelant, and not a 'TEST' message.

And this drivel is ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

IP address: 194.105.190.17
Reverse DNS: [No reverse DNS entry per ns0.ifb.net.]
Reverse DNS authenticity: [Unknown]
ASN: 8902
ASN Name: IFB (Internet For Business Limited)
IP range connectivity: 2
Registrar (per ASN): RIPE
Country (per IP registrar): GB [United Kingdom]
Country Currency: GBP [United Kingdom Pounds]
Country IP Range: 194.105.160.0 to 194.105.191.255
Country fraud profile: Normal
City (per outside source): Unknown
Country (per outside source): -- []
Private (internal) IP? No
IP address registrar: whois.ripe.net
Known Proxy? No
Link for WHOIS: 194.105.190.17

Wow I'm not impressed. The point being is the response to the test takes up
more bandwidth than the test.

Liam

lid wrote:

On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 10:29:28 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:


He's one of us who is tired of clueless Usenet users. Next time post
something revelant, and not a 'TEST' message.

And this drivel is ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

IP address: 194.105.190.17
Reverse DNS: [No reverse DNS entry per ns0.ifb.net.]
Reverse DNS authenticity: [Unknown]
ASN: 8902
ASN Name: IFB (Internet For Business Limited)
IP range connectivity: 2
Registrar (per ASN): RIPE
Country (per IP registrar): GB [United Kingdom]
Country Currency: GBP [United Kingdom Pounds]
Country IP Range: 194.105.160.0 to 194.105.191.255
Country fraud profile: Normal
City (per outside source): Unknown
Country (per outside source): -- []
Private (internal) IP? No
IP address registrar: whois.ripe.net
Known Proxy? No
Link for WHOIS: 194.105.190.17

Wow I'm not impressed. The point being is the response to the test takes up
more bandwidth than the test.


No one cares if you even keep breathing, let alone what you think
about how he posted a test message.



--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense!