| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
September 10th 06, 11:47 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner
|
|||
|
|||
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
funkbastler wrote:
No, but it darned sure wouldn't hurt to make sure they could drive something with a standard transmission. Would you have 1000 people learn to drive a standard transmission even though only one person out of those 1000 people benefits from it? The cost/benefit ratio is extremely high. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| 05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? | Policy | |||
| Why You Don't Like The ARRL | CB | |||
| Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Shortwave | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
| There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules | General | |||
Threaded Mode
