Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 8, 9:31 pm, Somewhere Nowhere wrote:
On 8 Feb 2007 15:44:03 -0800, "anonymous_c" wrote: There are a few other things to take into question. What frequency do you want to monitor? The PD and FD I want to monitor isaround 45MHz. I'd like to monitor the range of frequencies my scanner provides, also. What is the elevation of the town? Maybe 50 feet? I haven't moved to the area, yet. 78 miles is really pushing it, even with a beam antenna. I've heard, however, people receiving from even 100 miles... I'd just like to hear some other experiences. I have a scantenna and it is a signal magnet!!! I have not had the time to put it up on the roof yet. I have it mounted on the fence and at best it is 6" high. I have copied VHF at 35 miles. Later Brian -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Brian J. Rueger "Who dares wins" Capt.(Ret)/Paramedic Hampton, VA. B.S.Comm/I/Pilot MSgt, USAF (Ret.) 49199 Check out my personal home page:http://members.cox.net/brueger Check out my photography:http://www.usefilm.com/member/skypilot "Life's too short to drink LITE beer!" ---------------------------------------------------------------- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok, I need an antenna that performs equally well on VHF-lo and VHF-
hi... that's all I need. I've love to get the Scantenna, but I've heard people say that it's performance is "so-so" on VHF lo. I need great performance on both. A beam would probably be preferred. Anyone have some resources where I can build my own antenna? I'm wondering, however, if it would be better to purchase an antenna if I need good performance on all of VHF-low (30-50Mhz) and VHF-hi (148-174MHz). |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 Feb 2007 17:18:53 -0800, "anonymous_c" wrote:
Ok, I need an antenna that performs equally well on VHF-lo and VHF- hi... that's all I need. I've love to get the Scantenna, but I've heard people say that it's performance is "so-so" on VHF lo. I need great performance on both. A beam would probably be preferred. Anyone have some resources where I can build my own antenna? I'm wondering, however, if it would be better to purchase an antenna if I need good performance on all of VHF-low (30-50Mhz) and VHF-hi (148-174MHz). forget about building it ....... it's too big and too complicated of a job for what you want. better is to get a low band / high band TV antenna ( channels 2 and up ) , the bigger the better and turn it vertical for scanner use.. then get a suitable rotor and the highest mast you can install , for any hope of success for the distance you want to cover. a low noise stridsberg preamp and 50 ohm to 300 ohm balun are probably in the mix as well. any serious multi element beam for 30 - 174 mhz and up is gonna be a huge antenna . 12' to 16' long would be in the ball park for all the freqs and distance you want . the antenna above is still not large enough for perfect operation below 35 - 45 mhz or so ..... but more realistic than a dedicated 30 mhz 5 element beam. ( ie: 20' boom at 30 mhz ) http://www.cebik.com/a10/ant29.html just my thoughts on your question .... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Loop Antennas / minijack works-clips don't / impedence?? | Shortwave | |||
Idine Ghoreishian -by- Idine Ghoreishian { The SPGC Antenna by RHF } | Shortwave | |||
Outside Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna |