LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Report Post  
Old April 15th 05, 03:01 PM
Bill Crocker
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Steve Uhrig" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:39:01 -0400, Mark wrote:

I don't see why they bother to manually switch back to non encrypted.
Just
leave it there. Why are they actually making an effort to NOT encrypt?


Encryption usually decreases battery life by about 1/3.

On an XTS5000 running full time encryption and moderately heavy use,
it takes 3 batteries to get through a shift.

Steve


************************************************** *******************
Steve Uhrig, SWS Security, Maryland (USA)
Mfrs of electronic surveillance equip
website http://www.swssec.com
tel +1+410-879-4035, fax +1+410-836-1190
"In God we trust, all others we monitor"
************************************************** *******************


Wow, that would explain it! Thanks Steve.

Bill Crocker


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dave Hall, this is what you have been looking for Mr. Chigliac CB 13 March 12th 05 07:46 PM
blocked digital freq by police Charles Duncan Scanner 14 January 27th 04 10:06 AM
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history john private smith Policy 0 December 22nd 03 03:42 AM
Digital scanners online...Listen now ! bla Scanner 3 November 24th 03 08:53 AM
Alex Jones loses (yet another) shortwave listener..? BoB the Almighty Shortwave 2 July 31st 03 11:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017