Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
and cordless phones bands. By searching ebay I come across one that
stated it was manufactured before those bands were blocked. What other name brands plus models should I be searching for. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() why bother ? the FCC has ended the requirement to maintain analog cellular services by 2007. analog conversations in most large metro areas are already mostly dead, with the remaining services generally found in remote areas poorly served by digital services. don't spend a lot for your analog cellular scanner ( pro-43 or similar for example ) as it will soon become nearly worthless. On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:04:41 -0400, Scott wrote: and cordless phones bands. By searching ebay I come across one that stated it was manufactured before those bands were blocked. What other name brands plus models should I be searching for. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:59:33 -0700, krackula wrote:
why bother ? the FCC has ended the requirement to maintain analog cellular services by 2007. analog conversations in most large metro areas are already mostly dead, with the remaining services generally found in remote areas poorly served by digital services. don't spend a lot for your analog cellular scanner ( pro-43 or similar for example ) as it will soon become nearly worthless. I understand what you mean, but to be honest I doubt that my county will ever bother going digital. If so it'll be 15 years after everyone else does. They stay behind on everything. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:59:33 -0700, krackula wrote:
why bother ? the FCC has ended the requirement to maintain analog cellular services by 2007. analog conversations in most large metro areas are already mostly dead, with the remaining services generally found in remote areas poorly served by digital services. don't spend a lot for your analog cellular scanner ( pro-43 or similar for example ) as it will soon become nearly worthless. By the way I live in Newnan, GA Coweta County.....You have any information about them going digital. Were part of the Metro Atlanta area. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
BDK wrote in
: In article , says... On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:59:33 -0700, krackula wrote: why bother ? the FCC has ended the requirement to maintain analog cellular services by 2007. analog conversations in most large metro areas are already mostly dead, with the remaining services generally found in remote areas poorly served by digital services. don't spend a lot for your analog cellular scanner ( pro-43 or similar for example ) as it will soon become nearly worthless. By the way I live in Newnan, GA Coweta County.....You have any information about them going digital. Were part of the Metro Atlanta area. I can almost guarantee you that nearly all cell traffic in your area is digital and has been for some time now. Don't even bother. BDK Which isn't to say nothing of interest will ever pop up on the now defunct cell band. Not everyone is content with a frequency challenged scanner. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() " exactly " actually , there absolutely will be new services / transmissions that will fill those old analog freqs and 700- 800 mhz in general. new scanners ( those built after 2007 ) would logically be able to receive the whole 700 - 800 mhz band , with no exceptions , because the banned analog cellular calls will be gone. trouble is ( with old / current scanners , that is ) , not only would they be " frequency challenged " as you say , they will also be " scanning " challenged because the new reorganization of the 700 - 800 ( and others ) bands will have different channel spacing and modes of transmission. the only currently made scanners that will survive those changes ( properly ) will be the ones with manually programmable channel spacing ( on all bands ) and additionally they must have manually programmable mode selection too. a great many scanners, as a matter of fact , most current scanners have some sort of preprogrammed spacing / mode selection built into their eproms for use in automatic selection operation. serious scanner hobbyist will almost certainly want a scanner that addresses the new changes in process , esp band / mode changes . one especially, that doesn't prevent them from listening ( properly ) to the new activities that are in the works. if you are worried about having a scanner that will pick up the banned cellular freqs , forget about clinging to your old scanners and look to the new ones when they come out ( 2007 and beyond ) as they will surely be able to, since the banned restrictions will no longer apply. most people will want scanners with eproms that fit the new band spacing / freq / mode changes , basically flooding the market with current / older scanners that do not fit properly into the current changes taking place. zillions of current high end scanners will be had for a song when the new jobbies hit the market. you can bet that scanner makers have already geared up their production to address these issues and will try to beat each other to production. all the people that have bought those current expensive digital scanners or any scanner with preprogrammed eproms ( nearly any and all models ) will be stuck with old technology and be angry that their new $500 scanner only lasted 2 or 3 years before becoming obsolete. mega changes in the cages are at hand for everyone in this hobby. Which isn't to say nothing of interest will ever pop up on the now defunct cell band. Not everyone is content with a frequency challenged scanner. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|