Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am a new ham and will respond to this based on being new. I got my
license last year at age 48 so I'm neither a kid nor a senior. I've been tested and scored at 136 so I'm not a genius but am far from a dummy. I mention these things to give a general picture of who I am and where my position comes from. Radio Buff wrote: No more automatic renewals. Individuals must retest and pass all elements required for their license class. Although I see the reasoning behind this request I disagree. There are older hams who wouldn't be able to pass their license class test but who still enjoy participating in their nets and talking to their circle of ham friends. I don't want to be the one to take that away from a senior ham who is hurting absolutely no one by enjoying their hobby. The fact they might not pass the Extra test means nothing. Radio Buff isn't going to want to give up enjoying radio when he/she is older and can't pass the exam either. The passing score for written exams needs to be raised to 85%. I have no problem with this provided the exam is similar. If you want to raise the minimum score required while also increasing the difficulty level of the exam by 20-25% the combination will make it too difficult for many. You will kill amateur radio because there will be far fewer coming into the hobby than going SK. Code elements should be 13 wpm for General, and 20 wpm for Extra. Code should not be a part of the license test anymore than PSK or any other operating mode. There are so many different ways to enjoy and utilize amateur radio today that were not available decades ago that make code no longer a necessity. Mandating code skills is now similar to mandating slide rule skills for an engineer. It is an excellent tool and anyone capable of using it has a true skill. That said, there is nothing that can't be done by one without slide rule skills. They may be at a disadvantage at certain times and in certain specific locations and scenarios but for the most part the individual with the slide rule skills has no true advantage today as they did a few decades ago. The same holds true with code. I do believe there should be a segment of the bands each license class is authorized that is reserved for those with code in their license. It just shouldn't be a requirement any longer. It keeps otherwise intelligent and capable people away from the hobby and the goal should be to bring them in not keep them away. Make the no-code license one year non-renewable. This point is pointless with the sensible approach outlined above. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|