![]() |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
Al Klein wrote: On 12 Aug 2006 18:58:18 -0700, "an old friend" wrote: wrote: How did capacitors escape getting color coded? ssshhhhh bb don't ask such questions please Since a) you don't know the answer and b) they didn't. Develop "b)" a little more. |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
wrote: Al Klein wrote: On 12 Aug 2006 18:58:18 -0700, "an old friend" wrote: wrote: How did capacitors escape getting color coded? ssshhhhh bb don't ask such questions please Since a) you don't know the answer and b) they didn't. Develop "b)" a little more. he sure turning out like steve even started following to most of the ngs I like to post in nice guy |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
"an old friend" wrote in
ups.com: BTW why are you such an ill mannered lout that you can't address me by name Maybe Al doesn't like to type dirty words. Sc |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
slow code wrote: "an old friend" wrote in ups.com: BTW why are you such an ill mannered lout that you can't address me by name Maybe Al doesn't like to type dirty words. well mark certainly isn't one Sc |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
"Al Klein" wrote in message ... On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 03:48:18 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote: Al Klein wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Al Klein wrote: Those trying to eliminate the code requirement are the ones trying to alter history. The past cannot be altered. Only the present, which is not history, can be altered. WOW! Did you come up with that with no outside help? (I'm not overwhelmed - I'm not even whelmed.) You are the one who suggested above that it is possible to alter the past, i.e. "alter history". Keep going, Cecil, they'll name a book of aphorisms after you eventually. Aphorisms are statements of truth, however brief or terse. Do you consider truth a negative attribute? |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
Rusty Shackleford wrote: "Al Klein" wrote in message ... On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 03:48:18 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote: Al Klein wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Al Klein wrote: Those trying to eliminate the code requirement are the ones trying to alter history. The past cannot be altered. Only the present, which is not history, can be altered. WOW! Did you come up with that with no outside help? (I'm not overwhelmed - I'm not even whelmed.) You are the one who suggested above that it is possible to alter the past, i.e. "alter history". Keep going, Cecil, they'll name a book of aphorisms after you eventually. Aphorisms are statements of truth, however brief or terse. Do you consider truth a negative attribute? he certainly finds it inconveinent at times |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:22:50 GMT, "Rusty Shackleford"
wrote: "Al Klein" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 03:48:18 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote: Al Klein wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Al Klein wrote: Those trying to eliminate the code requirement are the ones trying to alter history. The past cannot be altered. Only the present, which is not history, can be altered. WOW! Did you come up with that with no outside help? (I'm not overwhelmed - I'm not even whelmed.) You are the one who suggested above that it is possible to alter the past, i.e. "alter history". Keep going, Cecil, they'll name a book of aphorisms after you eventually. Aphorisms are statements of truth, however brief or terse. Do you consider truth a negative attribute? If you're into definitions, look up "sarcasm" (which an aphorism frequently is). But an aphorism can also be an opinion, whether true or not. |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
Al Klein wrote: On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:22:50 GMT, "Rusty Shackleford" wrote: Aphorisms are statements of truth, however brief or terse. Do you consider truth a negative attribute? If you're into definitions, look up "sarcasm" (which an aphorism frequently is). But an aphorism can also be an opinion, whether true or not. do you accualy have anything to say on the topic or just more of your BS |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
an old friend wrote: wrote: Al Klein wrote: On 12 Aug 2006 18:58:18 -0700, "an old friend" wrote: wrote: How did capacitors escape getting color coded? ssshhhhh bb don't ask such questions please Since a) you don't know the answer and b) they didn't. Develop "b)" a little more. he sure turning out like steve even started following to most of the ngs I like to post in nice guy Signal tracing will show it's the same transmitter. |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
From: Al Klein on Tues, Aug 15 2006 5:35 am Groups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna, rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.scanner, rec.radio.swap wrote: From: Al Klein on Sun, Aug 13 2006 9:15 pm Groups: rec.radio.amateur.antenna, rec.radio.amateur.policy, rec.radio.scanner, rec.radio.swap On 12 Aug 2006 18:58:18 -0700, "an old friend" wrote: wrote: How did capacitors escape getting color coded? ssshhhhh bb don't ask such questions please Since a) you don't know the answer and b) they didn't. Klein, you said you were an OF. Any olde-fahrt ought to KNOW that silver-mica capacitors were color-dot-coded for about a quarter century. [look in the 1976 ARRL Handbook] Those flat cases were eventually displaced by dipped silver-mica. Paper tubular capacitors in molded plastic tubular casings were marked with color bands and were on the market for at least 15 years, maybe 20...until aced out by ceramic disc capacitors for general bypassing and coupling applications (by both tube and transistor architecture electronics). ANYONE with hands-on experience in electronics between 1950 and about 1970 would KNOW that. [okay, folks, looks like there's another imposter here...at least this one isn't trying to pass hisself off as some marine NCO...:-) Try reading what I wrote. Tsk, Klein, you don't write enough to read. It's all about implications, inferences, and vague "truths" which don't establish anything. Then you get ****ed off when others don't accept your "word" on things. I will ask directly: ARE you an olde-fahrt? Or long-timer? If so, HOW LONG? Try not to be too vague on this. Real truth will establish your "rep" in here. So far you don't have much of a "rep" except we all know you are a PRO-CODER. "They didn't" ... "escape". Looks like the impostor (as far as understanding simple English) isn't me. I can't see anyone named "They didn't" in the Google message list, nor that of "escape." Simply put, if you can't establish any bona fides for your alleged long-timerness, I'll just put you in the "imposter" list. [lots of folks from here in there...] |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com