![]() |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 00:22:31 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote: Al Klein wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Laziness allows one to achieve a goal by the most efficient route. Some famous German military leader said he would lots rather have brilliant and lazy officers than ambitious and stupid ones. As I recall, he was also known as one of the most idiotic strategists the species has ever produced. His "fame" didn't stop him from being the almost single-handed reason his country lost its big war, did it? This was a WWI German officer and I don't recall his name. Then it's just an assertion of yours, isn't it? Being both intelligent and ambitious doesn't appear on your radar? The pride, lust, and greed usually accompanying ambition are a good percentage of the seven deadly sins. Sorry, I don't share your religious incredulity. I don't recognize "sin" as anything but a nonsense word. |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 00:48:36 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote: Brenda Ann wrote: Some advanced appliance operators know enough to connect other peripheral devices such as digital mode devices or power amplifiers, but do not know how these devices work, nor how to construct such devices. An amateur radio license is an entry level license. There are a few classes - ONE class is entry level. It is not a university degree. When I obtained all amateur privileges at the age of 15, I didn't know squat. "When I robbed a man at the age of 15, I wasn't arrested." Does that make robbery legal? Your experience is only that - your experience, it's not definitive. All I had done is memorize the ARRL License Manual. Six years later I had a EE degree. What is wrong with learning the technical stuff after one obtains his entry level license? Nothing, if you don't care that the license means nothing more than that you have it. |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
On 12 Aug 2006 18:58:18 -0700, "an old friend"
wrote: wrote: How did capacitors escape getting color coded? ssshhhhh bb don't ask such questions please Since a) you don't know the answer and b) they didn't. |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that persondie?
jawod wrote:
you're trolling, aren't you? No, I'm wishing that every amateur radio operator had an above average IQ. Don't you agree that would be a good thing for them and the ARS? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that persondie?
Al Klein wrote:
An amateur radio license is an entry level license. There are a few classes - ONE class is entry level. They are all entry level. The Extra class license allows entry into the Extra class frequency segments. An amateur license is not a status symbol. Its only worth is the privileges granted. In the 1950's, generals, conditionals, advanced, and extras all had the same frequency privileges. I would like to see one amateur license granting all amateur privileges so this crazy irrational pecking order nonsense would cease. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:55:58 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote: No, I'm wishing that every amateur radio operator had an above average IQ. Easy solution - only award licenses to those with above average IQs. |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:05:37 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote: Al Klein wrote: An amateur radio license is an entry level license. There are a few classes - ONE class is entry level. They are all entry level. The Extra class license allows entry into the Extra class frequency segments. Using that logic, a PhD oral is an entry level exam - it allows entry into the ranks of those with PhDs. An amateur license is not a status symbol. Its only worth is the privileges granted. In the 1950's, generals, conditionals, advanced, and extras all had the same frequency privileges. Except that there were no advanced class licenses, and the extra was a prestige license. |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
|
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:34:58 -0400, wrote:
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 23:54:12 -0400, Al Klein wrote: On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:13:23 -0400, wrote: On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 18:24:46 -0400, Al Klein wrote: Your claim to know what I'm thinking better than I do? Only if your age is a single digit. sure I know better Then you're claiming to be a child. nope you are claiming to something contary to fact I'm claiming that I know what I think and you don't - which is a fact. you are worng it becoming hazing when the subject of the test is unrelated to the prevlegdes it grannts Nope - it's just a poor test. Hazing is something entirely different. you are dancing around sutblies in the menaing of emorizing like mad In your mind, because you can't understand the simple distinctions. and in the mind of engineer at least 2 of em and countless others as well Degrees don't guarantee competence - 50% of all engineers graduated in the bottom half of the class. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com