![]() |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
|
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
|
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
|
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
|
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
|
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
|
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
|
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:54:10 -0400, wrote:
not in my opinion which for the pruposes of posting is all that counts No, actually, "for the purposes of posting", your opinion doesn't count at all to most people. But, since you have such a limited view of the world, you won't understand what that means. |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
"Al Klein" wrote in message ... On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 12:55:58 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote: No, I'm wishing that every amateur radio operator had an above average IQ. Easy solution - only award licenses to those with above average IQs. with the punce gotcha he wonders why I simple don't bother to ty impoving my spelling -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 10:55:07 -0400, wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:12:21 -0400, Al Klein wrote: Sorry, I don't share your religious incredulity. I don't recognize "sin" as anything but a nonsense word. you certainly a polite ham ....NOT Is that religious bigotry I'm hearing, Mark? "Accept my beliefs as fact or be labeled impolite"? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com