Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dick Chisel" wrote in message om... [snip] Remember, the FCC DOES NOT CARE MUCH ABOUT LONG DISTANCE RADIO RECEPTION. Well, maybe they should. There *ARE* other users of the HF spectrum, you know--not just hams and SWLs. Right. The first two which come to mind are the military and the airlines. I expect the interference problem can be minimized by banning BPL from certain areas. And I'm also sure that interference complaints from either of those orginizations will be taken much more seriously than complaints from the ARRL. And there might not be enough of us to make them care. Probably true. :-( It's been suggested here that oversight of the public access parts of the radio spectrum be taken from the FCC and given to The National Park Service. If the public can enjoy the resource, then they will have an incentive to protect it. Frank Dresser |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank Dresser wrote:
The only politically safe way to show BPL is a failure is to let it fail. Well, -theoretically-, that's true. However, many of the trials so far *have* already been failures (from an interference standpoint). And the FCC by ignoring their own rules, doesn't seem to care. And that's bad because if it is not stopped now, but becomes widely entrenched with millions invested, it will be economically too late to be killed. Because of the demonstrated failures, NOW is the time to kill it...and, for whatever reason, the FCC is in the full "Ignore" mode. Because this is a political decision, not a technical one. Absolutely correct, it is viewed as political, not technical. But there is only one pesky little problem with that...NO ONE HAS YET REPEALED THE LAWS OF PHYSICS!!! |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dick Chisel wrote: Frank Dresser wrote: The only politically safe way to show BPL is a failure is to let it fail. Well, -theoretically-, that's true. However, many of the trials so far *have* already been failures (from an interference standpoint). And the FCC by ignoring their own rules, doesn't seem to care. And that's bad because if it is not stopped now, but becomes widely entrenched with millions invested, it will be economically too late to be killed. Because of the demonstrated failures, NOW is the time to kill it...and, for whatever reason, the FCC is in the full "Ignore" mode. Because this is a political decision, not a technical one. Absolutely correct, it is viewed as political, not technical. But there is only one pesky little problem with that...NO ONE HAS YET REPEALED THE LAWS OF PHYSICS!!! Calm down Carter, it'll be OK. dxAce Michigan USA |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
continuing real-time solar wind data - public comment | Antenna | |||
continuing real-time solar wind data - public comment | Shortwave | |||
Scorecard on WT Docket 05-235 | Policy | |||
Last Weekend To File FCC Comment | Dx | |||
Last Weekend To File FCC Comment | Dx |