What ISM(HiFer) allocations are really for.

November 9th 06, 11:53 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave

Jim Shaffer Jim Shaffer is offline

external usenet poster

First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2006

Posts: 21

What ISM(HiFer) allocations are really for.

On Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:16:25 GMT, Doug Smith W9WI
wrote:

"...50-W, non-reactive load."

In this context, "W" means "ohms". (why not just say ohms? I have no
idea)

Typo and/or bad font conversion, I suspect. The letter omega of the
opposite case from the one we use (I don't remember if it's upper or
lower) looks like a "w", only rounded. It's used in physics for
angular velocity.

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Electromagnetic frequency allocations in xml ?	[email protected]	General	0	December 10th 05 06:47 PM
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind?	K0HB	Policy	68	August 4th 03 03:28 PM
FUD ALERT !!!!! (was With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind?)	Carl R. Stevenson	General	17	August 1st 03 12:11 AM
FUD ALERT !!!!! (was With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind?)	Carl R. Stevenson	Policy	22	August 1st 03 12:11 AM
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind?	Dee D. Flint	Policy	1	July 21st 03 09:01 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:51 PM.

Menu

About Us