LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #14   Report Post  
Old January 10th 07, 01:02 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 16
Default Code is very close to dead. Slow Code please read.

Wrong. If you took the test and passed, you have proven your ability to
operate. Otherwise what's the point of testing?. If you ever took a cw
course or test you would understand the comment.

I was extending a personal opinion before where I commented on code
courses and the testing procedures. There's always room for improvement.

I don't concede to the fact that just because YOU believe testing does
nothing to enhance ones ability to operate, that it's true.

Your response about distress calls proves the point I have been making.
You admit to not having knowledge of cw beyond the ability to decipher
only two letters, S and O.

You can distinguish 2 of 26 letters and learning anymore according to you
is to difficult. I think you can learn more, you just won't make an
effort.

BTW, not all distress calls start out as SOS like in the movies. How
would you know you were hearing one, by looking at a computer screen all
the time?

To determine the effectiveness of a particular band you go looking for a
beacon signal. How do you know if your tuned on the right station if you
can't understand cw?

You admit the lack of cw knowledge would make it a necessity for you to
"call around" locating someone who could help if you heard a distress
call. If cw is not required anymore to obtain a license, locating someone
who does know cw might take a little while.

You want the opportunity to operate below 30 mhz without a cw test. Then
you shouldn't be allowed in the freq ranges allocated to cw until you are
endorsed for it. I certainly wouldn't desire less than a fully qualified
pilot in the cockpit or doctor in the operating room.

With your way of thinking, testing should allow full privileges and it
shouldn't have to be difficult so you can pass it without studying. That
is how I define the degradation of ham licensing.

You want to take the easy way out and I can't stop you, just don't expect
any pats on the back from those of us who had to work for what we got. At
least we can appreciate what we got. Here goes the neighborhood!

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
So who won the "when does NoCode happen" pool? robert casey Policy 115 January 9th 07 12:28 PM
Thirty Helpful Hints For KB9RQZ and His New Found Voice Priviledges (With Thanks AND Apologies To Slow Code...) [email protected] Policy 4 December 21st 06 02:48 PM
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio? Slow Code Antenna 140 November 14th 06 12:55 AM
Proof of the Necessity of Amatuer Radio Jerry Policy 127 September 22nd 05 03:34 AM
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC Brian Policy 3 October 24th 03 12:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017