Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 3, 8:43 am, wrote:
Hi Thanks for your replies everyone. My main reason for asking is that I also have a Yaesu FRG-100 with the Kiwa audio mod and and Kiwa filter modules (3.7 and 6 KHz). Running the two receivers off the same antenna, I find that the FRG-100 is slightly more sensitive to very weak signals. I know that for SSB the R71 has the advantage of the notch filter, but tuning AM signals either normally or using ECSS, I can find almost no signals on which the R71 outperforms the FRoG. The R71 does perhaps have a slight edge when dealing with nearby interference but I'd definitely say the FRoG is quieter and more sensitive. Given the fact that the R71 is generally more highly rated, I find this surprising. I've got the Passport White Papers for both receivers and it is true that they found the FRG-100 to be more sensitive than the R71. In fact it ranks as about the most sensitive receiver they've tested but the R71 was a bit of a legend for DXing about 20 years ago so I'm surprised that the FRoG can match it most of the time and beat it some of the time. As I've realigned my receiver with the help of a technician friend, do you think my R71 is faulty? Has anyone else had these two receivers side-by-side? Cheers Andy The FRG-100 is a hard receiver to beat sensitivity wise, probably due to the excellent S/N ratio. Plus the KIWA audio and filter mods definitely help. Keep in mind that the R71 design, although state of the art in its time, is a bit dated now and quadruple conversion has tradeoffs. Most of its problem is probably the horrible audio characteristics. Your comparison of the two doesn't surprise me in the least. Frank |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 4, 2:33 am, " wrote:
On Feb 3, 8:43 am, wrote: Hi Thanks for your replies everyone. My main reason for asking is that I also have a Yaesu FRG-100 with the Kiwa audio mod and and Kiwa filter modules (3.7 and 6 KHz). Running the two receivers off the same antenna, I find that the FRG-100 is slightly more sensitive to very weak signals. I know that for SSB the R71 has the advantage of the notch filter, but tuning AM signals either normally or using ECSS, I can find almost no signals on which the R71 outperforms the FRoG. The R71 does perhaps have a slight edge when dealing with nearby interference but I'd definitely say the FRoG is quieter and more sensitive. Given the fact that the R71 is generally more highly rated, I find this surprising. I've got the Passport White Papers for both receivers and it is true that they found the FRG-100 to be more sensitive than the R71. In fact it ranks as about the most sensitive receiver they've tested but the R71 was a bit of a legend for DXing about 20 years ago so I'm surprised that the FRoG can match it most of the time and beat it some of the time. As I've realigned my receiver with the help of a technician friend, do you think my R71 is faulty? Has anyone else had these two receivers side-by-side? Cheers Andy The FRG-100 is a hard receiver to beat sensitivity wise, probably due to the excellent S/N ratio. Plus the KIWA audio and filter mods definitely help. Keep in mind that the R71 design, although state of the art in its time, is a bit dated now and quadruple conversion has tradeoffs. Most of its problem is probably the horrible audio characteristics. Your comparison of the two doesn't surprise me in the least. Frank- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hi Frank Good to hear from you again. The Yaesu is excellent but I was still a bit worried about my R71's performance so with the service manual and help from a tech friend, I went through the whole sensitivity setting procedure again. I must have screwed up first time round. The R71 now comes close to matching the FRG-100 for sensitivity, the difference usually being negligible. You're right about the FR0G's audio being better, though. Cheers Andy |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi Frank Good to hear from you again. The Yaesu is excellent but I was still a bit worried about my R71's performance so with the service manual and help from a tech friend, I went through the whole sensitivity setting procedure again. I must have screwed up first time round. The R71 now comes close to matching the FRG-100 for sensitivity, the difference usually being negligible. You're right about the FR0G's audio being better, though. Cheers Andy- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Andy - are you back in the US now? I had an Icom R70 for a while and loved it despite the weird end of band tuning thing and the ergonomics. All-in-all I would consider it one of the top "DX machines". I sent it to a friend of mine in CO to use. My present collection includes and R-5000, R72, and NRD-525. I can't figure why my wife's name was in the header on the last two posts of mine (???) Frank K3YAZ Tucson |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Andy - are you back in the US now? I had an Icom R70 for a while and loved it despite the weird end of band tuning thing and the ergonomics. All-in-all I would consider it one of the top "DX machines". I sent it to a friend of mine in CO to use. My present collection includes and R-5000, R72, and NRD-525. I can't figure why my wife's name was in the header on the last two posts of mine (???) Frank K3YAZ Tucson Hi Frank I'm still living near Dubai working at a college. By the way, I'm from the UK originally, not the US. I must admit, I've been very tempted by both the R-5000 and the NRD-525. I bought an R-5000 on eBay a few years back but it was faulty. It had great audio, though. I really like the R71 and think I may spring for an R75 some time soon. Mind you, I was telling you that about 3 or 4 years ago. Still, I plan to buy one before the supplies run out as I'd like to get one brand new. If you had to choose between the 525 and the R-5000, which would you keep? Cheers Andy |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 4, 9:04 pm, wrote:
Andy - are you back in the US now? I had an Icom R70 for a while and loved it despite the weird end of band tuning thing and the ergonomics. All-in-all I would consider it one of the top "DX machines". I sent it to a friend of mine in CO to use. My present collection includes and R-5000, R72, and NRD-525. I can't figure why my wife's name was in the header on the last two posts of mine (???) Frank K3YAZ Tucson Hi Frank I'm still living near Dubai working at a college. By the way, I'm from the UK originally, not the US. I must admit, I've been very tempted by both the R-5000 and the NRD-525. I bought an R-5000 on eBay a few years back but it was faulty. It had great audio, though. I really like the R71 and think I may spring for an R75 some time soon. Mind you, I was telling you that about 3 or 4 years ago. Still, I plan to buy one before the supplies run out as I'd like to get one brand new. If you had to choose between the 525 and the R-5000, which would you keep? Cheers Andy This is an extremely hard choice. They are comparable, however, I've had three NRD-525's and two had the classic "JRC hiss" while the present one is very quiet and clean audio wise. Despite being good receivers the hiss was very annoying so I unloaded the first two. This is my first R-5000 and it's a top notch receiver. It probably has the best xtal filters of any radio I've had. I did upgrade the 6 kHz AM filter (Inrad) and added the 500 Hz CW filter. I actually prefer it over the R75 that I had only from a "feel" standpoint. The R75 was an excellent performer but I tend to be a "knobulator!" The bottom line is I think it would be a personal choice. Get both of them and let me know which one you like best! I also like the R72 I have despite the lack of advanced features. Very solid, simple receiver similar to the FRG-100 but it doesn't have the local FM intermod problem that made my FRG-100s rather useless in this location. Frank |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 5, 9:15 am, " wrote:
On Feb 4, 9:04 pm, wrote: Andy - are you back in the US now? I had an Icom R70 for a while and loved it despite the weird end of band tuning thing and the ergonomics. All-in-all I would consider it one of the top "DX machines". I sent it to a friend of mine in CO to use. My present collection includes and R-5000, R72, and NRD-525. I can't figure why my wife's name was in the header on the last two posts of mine (???) Frank K3YAZ Tucson Hi Frank I'm still living near Dubai working at a college. By the way, I'm from the UK originally, not the US. I must admit, I've been very tempted by both the R-5000 and the NRD-525. I bought an R-5000 on eBay a few years back but it was faulty. It had great audio, though. I really like the R71 and think I may spring for an R75 some time soon. Mind you, I was telling you that about 3 or 4 years ago. Still, I plan to buy one before the supplies run out as I'd like to get one brand new. If you had to choose between the 525 and the R-5000, which would you keep? Cheers Andy This is an extremely hard choice. They are comparable, however, I've had three NRD-525's and two had the classic "JRC hiss" while the present one is very quiet and clean audio wise. Despite being good receivers the hiss was very annoying so I unloaded the first two. This is my first R-5000 and it's a top notch receiver. It probably has the best xtal filters of any radio I've had. I did upgrade the 6 kHz AM filter (Inrad) and added the 500 Hz CW filter. I actually prefer it over the R75 that I had only from a "feel" standpoint. The R75 was an excellent performer but I tend to be a "knobulator!" The bottom line is I think it would be a personal choice. Get both of them and let me know which one you like best! I also like the R72 I have despite the lack of advanced features. Very solid, simple receiver similar to the FRG-100 but it doesn't have the local FM intermod problem that made my FRG-100s rather useless in this location. Frank- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I've often thought about getting another R-5000. I only had mine for about 3 or 4 days but it had a bad connection somewhere, which caused the sensitivity to drop intermittently, and bad key-bounce. If I could find a perfect one running off 240 V, I think I'd be sorely tempted. The audio was the best I've heard and made for really pleasant listening. Cheers Andy |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 5, 6:22 am, wrote:
On Feb 5, 9:15 am, " wrote: On Feb 4, 9:04 pm, wrote: Andy - are you back in the US now? I had an Icom R70 for a while and loved it despite the weird end of band tuning thing and the ergonomics. All-in-all I would consider it one of the top "DX machines". I sent it to a friend of mine in CO to use. My present collection includes and R-5000, R72, and NRD-525. I can't figure why my wife's name was in the header on the last two posts of mine (???) Frank K3YAZ Tucson Hi Frank I'm still living near Dubai working at a college. By the way, I'm from the UK originally, not the US. I must admit, I've been very tempted by both the R-5000 and the NRD-525. I bought an R-5000 on eBay a few years back but it was faulty. It had great audio, though. I really like the R71 and think I may spring for an R75 some time soon. Mind you, I was telling you that about 3 or 4 years ago. Still, I plan to buy one before the supplies run out as I'd like to get one brand new. If you had to choose between the 525 and the R-5000, which would you keep? Cheers Andy This is an extremely hard choice. They are comparable, however, I've had three NRD-525's and two had the classic "JRC hiss" while the present one is very quiet and clean audio wise. Despite being good receivers the hiss was very annoying so I unloaded the first two. This is my first R-5000 and it's a top notch receiver. It probably has the best xtal filters of any radio I've had. I did upgrade the 6 kHz AM filter (Inrad) and added the 500 Hz CW filter. I actually prefer it over the R75 that I had only from a "feel" standpoint. The R75 was an excellent performer but I tend to be a "knobulator!" The bottom line is I think it would be a personal choice. Get both of them and let me know which one you like best! I also like the R72 I have despite the lack of advanced features. Very solid, simple receiver similar to the FRG-100 but it doesn't have the local FM intermod problem that made my FRG-100s rather useless in this location. Frank- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I've often thought about getting another R-5000. I only had mine for about 3 or 4 days but it had a bad connection somewhere, which caused the sensitivity to drop intermittently, and bad key-bounce. If I could find a perfect one running off 240 V, I think I'd be sorely tempted. The audio was the best I've heard and made for really pleasant listening. Cheers Andy Hi Andy, The bad connection on the R5000 may be the 6khz filter not getting a good connection. The one I have had that problem when I got it. Took the top off & poked around some & was able to find it. 73, Ken KG4BIG |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Potential problems with the ICOM PCR1000 re installation on a pentium IV XP System? | Shortwave | |||
Icom 706 MkII G Finals | Equipment | |||
Icom R-75 Software and RS232 Port | Shortwave | |||
Icom 756, Icom 275, Icom SM-8 | Swap | |||
Icom 730 Preventative Maintenance Questions | Homebrew |