|
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
wrote in message oups.com... Looks like you need to change your perspective, on how HD Radio is being marketed to the public, because this baby is dead - too-little- too-late. Those of us who have been involved with HD since its earliest developmental days feel that the project is going ahead faster than expected. The significant FMs in the top 100 markets, with few exceptions, are all on with HD or are committed with contracts signed. There are already several hundred "first step" HD-2 channels going, and more and more receivers are appearing, some getting close to the critical price points for mass sales. As I have said, AM HD may be a different issue (although the truly significant stations are on in the major markets) but that is a problem with the health and future viability of the AM band, not with HD itself. Keep in mind that much new technology is expensive in its early phases... my first VCR cost over $800, while my first CD player cost $1,400. I can now get a VHS (were I to want one) for around $30 and a portable CD player was spotted at retail last week for under $15. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message .net... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: wrote in message ps.com... If any of your co-workers surf the Internet here, I would be pretty embarrassed, if I were you, posting all this personal information, then being caught mutiple-times spreading lies. A number of my co-workers follow these exchanges with amusement. In fact, I showed a couple of your posts about AM news talk billing and operations to the managers of two of the 50 kw stations on your list (the one you posted a link for) and they had a grand old time chuckling about how little the general public knows about the actual operation of radio stations. The comment about AM news talkers getting higer rates than FMs got more laughter than a good Leno monologue. I have been following your exchange with DxAce and this guy you responded to and I must say that more you post the worse you look. This type of response sounds like total BS. What BS is there in refuting the lies about AM rates, billing and ratings with actual facts? Snip What makes you look bad in my eyes is alluding to other people disrespecting your opponents opinion in this debate. The fact that you feel the need to fall back on a debate tactic shows weakness. Truth needs no debate tactic and can stand on it own in the face of greater odds. However, if it is BS then you don't have the power of unassailable truth to prop up your argument and so the fact that you feel the need to fall back on a device is understood. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 21, 11:38 am, dxAce wrote:
Steve wrote: On Feb 21, 2:22 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: Separating wheat from the chaff is an old concept, often forgotten. The internet is a great leveler, but does not make a distinction between the well reasoned and documented and the blindly opinionated. And the internet is an ideal environment for people, like you, who happen to be pathological liars. President of Programming...my ass! Oh come on, give the boy a break! He has/had great Bozo hair: http://www.davidgleason.com/1998_Radio_Ink.htm DX Ace - Actually that is a nice informative read. ~ RHF http://www.davidgleason.com/DFG%20-%...%20Article.pdf Hey the guy can't be that bad - After all he is know to 'issue' QSL Cards = http://www.schoechi.de/an-usa09.html KTNQ 1020, Los Angeles, CA. Freq only verie letter in 14 days from v/s David Gleason, V.P. AM Programming (and a Dxer) for a taped report and ms. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 20, 5:40 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"RHF" wrote in message oups.com... And the 'point' being . . . that back in 1941 AM Radio was "King". those were the days of great coast-to-coast am radio ~ RHF . Yes, that was because there was no TV. There was only light usage of radio in the daytime as most people had only one household radio, in the living room. Portables and even car radios were not a factor. Since the 50's, following the lift of the TV Freeze, the night listening to radio has been much lower. Daytime listening became the key to radio stations. Today, 7 PM-Midnight listening is less than a third the level in morning drive, mid-days or afternoons. Nearly no revenue is generated in the evening, either. So, with less than 1000 stations in 1941, listeners often had to listen to distant signals at night to hear their favorite network programs. Today, with 14,000 stations, few are far from a broad choice of signals. And the comedies and drama shows are on TV, not rado. So nighttime distant reception by the average listener has no benefit other than curiosity. Yes that was then in 1941, and Today {2007} In-the-Here-and-Now ! I have come to like the Artist and Music/Song Title feature on the XM Satellete Radio - Hey Wasn't That ? - Wow I Was Right ! :o) ~ RHF QUESTION - Why the H*ll Don't the Spanish Language Radio and TV Stations have English on the SAP Channel ? i want to know ~ RHF |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 22, 3:43 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message ... What makes you look bad in my eyes is alluding to other people disrespecting your opponents opinion in this debate. The things I have disputed are not opinions. They are lies. Any why should we believe you, a man who would not only misrepresent his own professional standing but also that of others, in an effort to harm their careers? AM talk does not get higher rates than FMs with equal audience. There is little AM audinece under 45 The AM audinece is shrinking. There is little AM audience at night. These are facts proven by Arbitron and the financial data collecion organizations. Someone with as little regard for the truth as you should avoid talk of 'proof'. The fact that you feel the need to fall back on a debate tactic shows weakness. Truth needs no debate tactic and can stand on it own in the face of greater odds. However, if it is BS then you don't have the power of unassailable truth to prop up your argument and so the fact that you feel the need to fall back on a device is understood. Our friend "Reject" is simply posting the same untrue facts over and over. In that case, you and Reject have borrowed a page from the same playbook. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
RHF wrote: On Feb 21, 11:38 am, dxAce wrote: Steve wrote: On Feb 21, 2:22 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: Separating wheat from the chaff is an old concept, often forgotten. The internet is a great leveler, but does not make a distinction between the well reasoned and documented and the blindly opinionated. And the internet is an ideal environment for people, like you, who happen to be pathological liars. President of Programming...my ass! Oh come on, give the boy a break! He has/had great Bozo hair: http://www.davidgleason.com/1998_Radio_Ink.htm DX Ace - Actually that is a nice informative read. ~ RHF http://www.davidgleason.com/DFG%20-%...%20Article.pdf Hey the guy can't be that bad - After all he is know to 'issue' QSL Cards = http://www.schoechi.de/an-usa09.html KTNQ 1020, Los Angeles, CA. Freq only verie letter in 14 days from v/s David Gleason, V.P. AM Programming (and a Dxer) for a taped report and ms. But note that he doesn't use the 'Eduardo' moniker. He's never known to have used that or signed anything like that, even was he was in Latin America or South America. It's always been David Gleason or David F. Gleason. dxAce Michigan USA |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
dxAce wrote: RHF wrote: On Feb 21, 11:38 am, dxAce wrote: Steve wrote: On Feb 21, 2:22 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: Separating wheat from the chaff is an old concept, often forgotten. The internet is a great leveler, but does not make a distinction between the well reasoned and documented and the blindly opinionated. And the internet is an ideal environment for people, like you, who happen to be pathological liars. President of Programming...my ass! Oh come on, give the boy a break! He has/had great Bozo hair: http://www.davidgleason.com/1998_Radio_Ink.htm DX Ace - Actually that is a nice informative read. ~ RHF http://www.davidgleason.com/DFG%20-%...%20Article.pdf Hey the guy can't be that bad - After all he is know to 'issue' QSL Cards = http://www.schoechi.de/an-usa09.html KTNQ 1020, Los Angeles, CA. Freq only verie letter in 14 days from v/s David Gleason, V.P. AM Programming (and a Dxer) for a taped report and ms. But note that he doesn't use the 'Eduardo' moniker. He's never known to have used that or signed anything like that, even was he was in Latin America or South America. It's always been David Gleason or David F. Gleason. And also note that those listed veries are from 1999, just prior to Frackelton adopting the 'Eduardo' shtick c.2000. dxAce Michigan USA |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 20, 12:09?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "Steve" wrote in message roups.com... On Feb 19, 9:10 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message groups.com... We've seen him confused now about his own job title, A typo is not confusing to me. Apparently it is to you Lies apparently aren't confusing to you, either. Again, a mistake by an industry association in a convention program is hardly an issue his ethnicity Ethnically, I am Irish and Celt. There is no confusion there. Not on my part, but then I don't go around calling myself Eduardo. As mentioned, it was my baptismal name... given to me by my godparents on that occasion. Wait! Didn't you say in the past that it was given to you by your Mother at your baptism? Correct. My mother selected the name, and the godparents "gave it" at the ceremony... as in "they gave the response" That's the way it is done. The priest asks the godparents, "and what name have you selected..." and the godparents respond. The person who decided on the name can be the parents, or the whole family, I suppose. In my case, it was my mother... who used a name she liked from when she lived in Europe whjich was, as required, also the name of a saint. At any rate, here is a quote from August 20, 2006 in alt.politics.immigration: "Funny, because I was baptized in 1947 and "Eduardo" is a name my mother liked from the time she lived in Europe." I guess your godparents liked it too. Myself, I would have baptized you 'Stupido'. You don't understand the baptism ceremony, obviously. When my daughters were baptized, a saint's name was added to the first given name... such as Jennifer Anne Altieri Gleason, and so on. In this case, the parents decided, and the grandparents answered the responsorial question as was the custom. The fact that the godparents give a response does not mean they made the decision, although they could have been given the honor if the family had wanted. You make an issue out of the simplest things.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - How stupid are you ? You post all this personal information on the Internet, then provide a link to your Web site: http://davidgleason.com/ Not as stupid as you, obviously. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
That WENCH,Barbie Bassett had the audacity to email me a short while
ago.She doesn't know anything at ALL about the weather.Chief Meterologist,my ass!!!!! http://barbiebassett.blogspot.com She needs to go blog her hoot owl looking fat ass somewhere else! The DUMB Broad! cuhulin |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 23, 5:19?pm, "Guerite?" wrote:
wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 20, 12:09?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "Steve" wrote in message roups.com... On Feb 19, 9:10 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message groups.com... We've seen him confused now about his own job title, A typo is not confusing to me. Apparently it is to you Lies apparently aren't confusing to you, either. Again, a mistake by an industry association in a convention program is hardly an issue his ethnicity Ethnically, I am Irish and Celt. There is no confusion there. Not on my part, but then I don't go around calling myself Eduardo. As mentioned, it was my baptismal name... given to me by my godparents on that occasion. Wait! Didn't you say in the past that it was given to you by your Mother at your baptism? Correct. My mother selected the name, and the godparents "gave it" at the ceremony... as in "they gave the response" That's the way it is done. The priest asks the godparents, "and what name have you selected..." and the godparents respond. The person who decided on the name can be the parents, or the whole family, I suppose. In my case, it was my mother... who used a name she liked from when she lived in Europe whjich was, as required, also the name of a saint. At any rate, here is a quote from August 20, 2006 in alt.politics.immigration: "Funny, because I was baptized in 1947 and "Eduardo" is a name my mother liked from the time she lived in Europe." I guess your godparents liked it too. Myself, I would have baptized you 'Stupido'. You don't understand the baptism ceremony, obviously. When my daughters were baptized, a saint's name was added to the first given name... such as Jennifer Anne Altieri Gleason, and so on. In this case, the parents decided, and the grandparents answered the responsorial question as was the custom. The fact that the godparents give a response does not mean they made the decision, although they could have been given the honor if the family had wanted. You make an issue out of the simplest things.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - How stupid are you ? You post all this personal information on the Internet, then provide a link to your Web site: http://davidgleason.com/ Not as stupid as you, obviously.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - "In-Stat: Digital Radio Set to Take Off" "In 2006, 73 percent of respondents to an In-Stat U.S. consumer survey were aware of HD Radio on some level." http://beradio.com/eyeoniboc/instat-digital-radio-set/ "Sirius, XM, and HD: Consumer interest reality check" (Alexaholic) "While interest in satellite radio is diminishing, interest in HD shows no signs of a pulse." http://www.hear2.com/2007/02/sirius_....html#comments This just confirms, the lack of interest for HD Radio, on Google Trends: http://www.google.com/trends?q=%22hd... =all&date=all For now, HD Radio/IBOC is dead. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com