|
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
Telamon wrote: In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: wrote in message ps.com... If any of your co-workers surf the Internet here, I would be pretty embarrassed, if I were you, posting all this personal information, then being caught mutiple-times spreading lies. A number of my co-workers follow these exchanges with amusement. In fact, I showed a couple of your posts about AM news talk billing and operations to the managers of two of the 50 kw stations on your list (the one you posted a link for) and they had a grand old time chuckling about how little the general public knows about the actual operation of radio stations. The comment about AM news talkers getting higer rates than FMs got more laughter than a good Leno monologue. I have been following your exchange with DxAce and this guy you responded to and I must say that more you post the worse you look. This type of response sounds like total BS. You used to have some credibility with me but not any more after reading this thread. You see I don't just discount what someone states because I don't like it and make no mistake I generally do not like the viewpoint of what you post. I'm not interest in your ego but news and information that you posses and decide to share on Usenet. He's practised at the art of deception.. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
I don't hate David Eduardo.(it's all politicians all over the World that
I hate) But I don't like IBOC regardless of what anybody says.I really doubt that anybody can ever convince me that IBOC is good. cuhulin |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
|
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"Steve" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 20, 9:28 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: No, the steering committe of the NAB does the programs, not the speakers. They get their information from somewhere. They don't emerge from their mother's wombs knowing who will present on which topic, or what so-and-so's job title is. Probably they get the title from someone who recommends a person for a panel. In the case of the "Programming Superstars" panel I was on, they got the names from the COO or CEO of each of America's major broadcast companies. So now it appears you not only lied about your own job title but you also lied about a colleague's in order to promote your own political ends. Pathetic. That is pretty funny. The engineering seminars and panels are scheduled by an entirely separate group, made up of other engineers. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 20, 10:49 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 20, 9:28 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: No, the steering committe of the NAB does the programs, not the speakers. They get their information from somewhere. They don't emerge from their mother's wombs knowing who will present on which topic, or what so-and-so's job title is. Probably they get the title from someone who recommends a person for a panel. In the case of the "Programming Superstars" panel I was on, they got the names from the COO or CEO of each of America's major broadcast companies. Fine. And why would someone recommending you think that you were the President of Programming? So now it appears you not only lied about your own job title but you also lied about a colleague's in order to promote your own political ends. Pathetic. That is pretty funny. The engineering seminars and panels are scheduled by an entirely separate group, made up of other engineers. And of course there's no way that you could at some point have actually exchanged words with someone in "an entirely separate group". I mean, surely that sort of thing just never happens. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
Steve wrote: On Feb 20, 10:49 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 20, 9:28 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: No, the steering committe of the NAB does the programs, not the speakers. They get their information from somewhere. They don't emerge from their mother's wombs knowing who will present on which topic, or what so-and-so's job title is. Probably they get the title from someone who recommends a person for a panel. In the case of the "Programming Superstars" panel I was on, they got the names from the COO or CEO of each of America's major broadcast companies. Fine. And why would someone recommending you think that you were the President of Programming? So now it appears you not only lied about your own job title but you also lied about a colleague's in order to promote your own political ends. Pathetic. That is pretty funny. The engineering seminars and panels are scheduled by an entirely separate group, made up of other engineers. And of course there's no way that you could at some point have actually exchanged words with someone in "an entirely separate group". I mean, surely that sort of thing just never happens. It happens in 'Edweenies World'.. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 20, 10:49 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 20, 9:28 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: No, the steering committe of the NAB does the programs, not the speakers. They get their information from somewhere. They don't emerge from their mother's wombs knowing who will present on which topic, or what so-and-so's job title is. Probably they get the title from someone who recommends a person for a panel. In the case of the "Programming Superstars" panel I was on, they got the names from the COO or CEO of each of America's major broadcast companies. Fine. And why would someone recommending you think that you were the President of Programming? Someone at NAB wrote it down wrong, probably. So now it appears you not only lied about your own job title but you also lied about a colleague's in order to promote your own political ends. Pathetic. That is pretty funny. The engineering seminars and panels are scheduled by an entirely separate group, made up of other engineers. And of course there's no way that you could at some point have actually exchanged words with someone in "an entirely separate group". I mean, surely that sort of thing just never happens. Not in this case. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
"Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: wrote in message ps.com... If any of your co-workers surf the Internet here, I would be pretty embarrassed, if I were you, posting all this personal information, then being caught mutiple-times spreading lies. A number of my co-workers follow these exchanges with amusement. In fact, I showed a couple of your posts about AM news talk billing and operations to the managers of two of the 50 kw stations on your list (the one you posted a link for) and they had a grand old time chuckling about how little the general public knows about the actual operation of radio stations. The comment about AM news talkers getting higer rates than FMs got more laughter than a good Leno monologue. I have been following your exchange with DxAce and this guy you responded to and I must say that more you post the worse you look. This type of response sounds like total BS. What BS is there in refuting the lies about AM rates, billing and ratings with actual facts? In addtion, the "reject" posted a list of supoposedly major 50 kw Am stations as part of his argument on thier success and high rates... I spoke with the managers of two of those stations who found it intersting that there is a perception that AM is generally healthy wen it is not. You used to have some credibility with me but not any more after reading this thread. So the truth about AM, with documented data (Arbitron, BIA, Miller Kaplan, etc) is not credible. If I said that AM was healthy and growing, would you have liked it better? Unfortunately, that is just not true. You see I don't just discount what someone states because I don't like it and make no mistake I generally do not like the viewpoint of what you post. I am discounting "reject" because he has his facts totally wrong. I'm not interest in your ego but news and information that you posses and decide to share on Usenet. And that is what I posted... yet Mr. Reject keeps posting lies about AM that he can neither document nor provide sources for his claims.... his limit is to present a list of 50 kw stations, some of which are absolute dogs... as if their existence proves that AM is "getting better every day." |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
On Feb 20, 11:14 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Feb 20, 10:49 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message groups.com... On Feb 20, 9:28 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: No, the steering committe of the NAB does the programs, not the speakers. They get their information from somewhere. They don't emerge from their mother's wombs knowing who will present on which topic, or what so-and-so's job title is. Probably they get the title from someone who recommends a person for a panel. In the case of the "Programming Superstars" panel I was on, they got the names from the COO or CEO of each of America's major broadcast companies. Fine. And why would someone recommending you think that you were the President of Programming? Someone at NAB wrote it down wrong, probably. Sure. Just the way you told it to them. So now it appears you not only lied about your own job title but you also lied about a colleague's in order to promote your own political ends. Pathetic. That is pretty funny. The engineering seminars and panels are scheduled by an entirely separate group, made up of other engineers. And of course there's no way that you could at some point have actually exchanged words with someone in "an entirely separate group". I mean, surely that sort of thing just never happens. Not in this case. In any event, I hope you did not manage to discredit this other person or damage their reputation in any way, which is obviously what you intended. |
David Eduardo - A Recent Conversation
dxAce wrote:
He's practised at the art of deception.. You owe the Stones some royalty money for that line. mike |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com