On Feb 22, 3:43 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message

...



What makes you look bad in my eyes is alluding to other people
disrespecting your opponents opinion in this debate.

The things I have disputed are not opinions. They are lies.

Any why should we believe you, a man who would not only misrepresent
his own professional standing but also that of others, in an effort to
harm their careers?


AM talk does not get higher rates than FMs with equal audience.
There is little AM audinece under 45
The AM audinece is shrinking.
There is little AM audience at night.

These are facts proven by Arbitron and the financial data collecion
organizations.

Someone with as little regard for the truth as you should avoid talk
of 'proof'.

The fact that you
feel the need to fall back on a debate tactic shows weakness. Truth
needs no debate tactic and can stand on it own in the face of greater
odds. However, if it is BS then you don't have the power of unassailable
truth to prop up your argument and so the fact that you feel the need to
fall back on a device is understood.

Our friend "Reject" is simply posting the same untrue facts over and over.

In that case, you and Reject have borrowed a page from the same
playbook.