Hi agng,
At one time I had bookmarked a site that had audio files of what various
digital modes sounded like as an aid to recognizing them on the air. Now I
can't find it. :-/ Anyone know of one?

Thanks!

"Bob Liesenfeld" wrote in message
...
Hi agng,
At one time I had bookmarked a site that had audio files of what various
digital modes sounded like as an aid to recognizing them on the air. Now
I can't find it. :-/ Anyone know of one?

Thanks!
This URL perhaps?
http://www.kb9ukd.com/digital/

CL

"Caveat Lector" wrote in message
...

"Bob Liesenfeld" wrote in message
...
Hi agng,
At one time I had bookmarked a site that had audio files of what various
digital modes sounded like as an aid to recognizing them on the air. Now
I can't find it. :-/ Anyone know of one?

Thanks!
This URL perhaps?
http://www.kb9ukd.com/digital/

CL

Nice link. Thanks.

--
rb

Here's Ibiquity testing in Cincinnati in 2001 on 1660kHz (heard in Central Ohio)

WQSN in Kalamazoo MI in the first few seconds, with Cincinnati phased away.

http://rhhardin.home.mindspring.com/wd2xam.ram
--
Ron Hardin


On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk.

"Ron Hardin" wrote in message
...
Here's Ibiquity testing in Cincinnati in 2001 on 1660kHz (heard in Central
Ohio)

WQSN in Kalamazoo MI in the first few seconds, with Cincinnati phased
away.


Keep in mind that the algorithm used then is nothing like the one in use now
to the extent that anything that old is irrelevant.

David Eduardo wrote:
"Ron Hardin" wrote in message
...
Here's Ibiquity testing in Cincinnati in 2001 on 1660kHz (heard in Central
Ohio)

WQSN in Kalamazoo MI in the first few seconds, with Cincinnati phased
away.


Keep in mind that the algorithm used then is nothing like the one in use now
to the extent that anything that old is irrelevant.

Actually, on second thought, I take this back. It's surprising
sometimes how useful some of these old algorithms are.