On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:40:29 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:

Most say DX (and even
shortwave) is anachronistic and a few wax nostalgic about an era when, as
they admit, there were fewer local stations and vastly fewer media choices.

Thank you for posting. The article shows that there is going to be scant
objection to HD at night on AM.

It is the only source of radio for a lot of people in the suburbs.
They will lose most of their choices. I cannot receive any talk radio
except via DX from SFO or Sacramento or Reno or Las Vegas.

THE FCC - Dismisses several pending Petitions for Reconsideration and
Petitions for Rulemaking that asked, inter alia, the Commission to
reconsider the adoption of iBiquity's in-band, onchannel (IBOC) system as
the technology chosen for DAB transmission;

http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-271699A1.pdf

On Mar 28, 8:16?pm, "HD Radio?" wrote:
THE FCC - Dismisses several pending Petitions for Reconsideration and
Petitions for Rulemaking that asked, inter alia, the Commission to
reconsider the adoption of iBiquity's in-band, onchannel (IBOC) system as
the technology chosen for DAB transmission;

http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-271699A1.pdf

It's still not a done-deal - thje FCC left it open for the marketplace
to decide the fate of HD/IBOC - LOL !!!

http://www.google.com/trends?q=%22hd...o=all&date=all

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Mar 28, 8:16?pm, "HD Radio?" wrote:
THE FCC - Dismisses several pending Petitions for Reconsideration and
Petitions for Rulemaking that asked, inter alia, the Commission to
reconsider the adoption of iBiquity's in-band, onchannel (IBOC) system as
the technology chosen for DAB transmission;

http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-271699A1.pdf

It's still not a done-deal - thje FCC left it open for the marketplace
to decide the fate of HD/IBOC - LOL !!!

No, the FCC approved HD as the only system, and rejected petitions to
reconsider from others. The marketplace will now decide how fast the
receivers sell and how HD is used. The fact is that projections look
extremely good and will ahead of the initial estimates or goals from the
June 2006 launch.

On Mar 28, 9:01?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...

On Mar 28, 8:16?pm, "HD Radio?" wrote:
THE FCC - Dismisses several pending Petitions for Reconsideration and
Petitions for Rulemaking that asked, inter alia, the Commission to
reconsider the adoption of iBiquity's in-band, onchannel (IBOC) system as
the technology chosen for DAB transmission;

http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-271699A1.pdf

It's still not a done-deal - thje FCC left it open for the marketplace
to decide the fate of HD/IBOC - LOL !!!

No, the FCC approved HD as the only system, and rejected petitions to
reconsider from others. The marketplace will now decide how fast the
receivers sell and how HD is used. The fact is that projections look
extremely good and will ahead of the initial estimates or goals from the
June 2006 launch.

Isn't that what I said ? :-) So far, the marketplace has decided,
with few HD Radios sold, and no doubt, many returned for lousy
reception and poor HD channel programming. Project all you want, but
exciting technologies don't have to be pushed onto consumers with a
$500,000,000 ad campaign. You know, as well as I do, consumers will
never be interested - consumers are interested in gaming-systems, cell
phones, Satellite Radio, and the Internet. No one listens with HD
radios !

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Mar 28, 9:01?pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...

On Mar 28, 8:16?pm, "HD Radio?" wrote:
THE FCC - Dismisses several pending Petitions for Reconsideration and
Petitions for Rulemaking that asked, inter alia, the Commission to
reconsider the adoption of iBiquity's in-band, onchannel (IBOC) system
as
the technology chosen for DAB transmission;

http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-271699A1.pdf

It's still not a done-deal - thje FCC left it open for the marketplace
to decide the fate of HD/IBOC - LOL !!!

No, the FCC approved HD as the only system, and rejected petitions to
reconsider from others. The marketplace will now decide how fast the
receivers sell and how HD is used. The fact is that projections look
extremely good and will ahead of the initial estimates or goals from the
June 2006 launch.

Isn't that what I said ? :-) So far, the marketplace has decided,
with few HD Radios sold,

A million this year is pretty good.

and no doubt, many returned for lousy
reception and poor HD channel programming.

Nobody actually involved has any reports of either.

Project all you want, but
exciting technologies don't have to be pushed onto consumers with a
$500,000,000 ad campaign. You know, as well as I do, consumers will
never be interested - consumers are interested in gaming-systems, cell
phones, Satellite Radio, and the Internet. No one listens with HD
radios !


You are making assumptions and have absolutely no sales or listener based
facts.