Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 7, 5:34?pm, Tester wrote:
WTRI is close enough to Washington that the FCC should have thought twice about putting a station 20 kHz away from a 50 kw powerhouse like WTWP even if it is daytime only. Still, it isn't an adjacent channel and I don't think it should be a problem with a receiver with decent selectivity. WTRI runs 17 kw in the daytime but only 1400 watts in the "critical hours" around sunrise and sunset. WTRI is northwest of Washington; Mr. Harms appears to be just southwest of Baltimore. He is well within the daytime range which includes both Baltimore and Washington but not within the "critical hours" range. -- Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com I have tried this on three different receivers, including an expensive digital in-dash radio, with the same results. I have received the interference from within WTRI's protected contour, idiot ! The station manager has gotten complaints from within his protected contour, idiot ! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WTWP, more listening | Broadcasting | |||
WTOP 1500AM Leaving BCB Tonight | Shortwave | |||
FCC Announces Freqs Protected from BPL Interference | Shortwave | |||
WTOP DX test | Broadcasting | |||
WTOP DX test | Shortwave |