Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... On Apr 9, 12:25 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... On Apr 9, 12:07 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: Satellite is not content regulated, but the possibility of a boycott of a satellite company or of their advertisers or resellers is possible.- Hide quoted text - Err....yes, that possibility is indeed possible. If you check, I think you'll find that most possibilities are possible. That's why we call them "possibilities". The point is that any action against Imus for terrestrial radio programs can be duplicated for satellite. At the same time, there is little or no regulatory pressure per the FCC rules that can be put on either medium... unless it went all the way to "fitness as a licensee" which has never been applied to content of this type (fitness has been applied to convicted felons and sex offenders, not to content). This is consistent with the possibility of possibilities, is it not? Yeah, if this were alt.usage.english |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Don Imus to Announce Retirement MSNBC drops Imus | Shortwave | |||
Don Imus to Announce Retirement MSNBC drops Imus | Shortwave | |||
Don Imus to Announce Retirement MSNBC drops Imus | Shortwave | |||
Don Imus to Announce Retirement MSNBC drops Imus | Shortwave | |||
Don Imus to Announce Retirement MSNBC drops Imus | Shortwave |