"ve3..." wrote:

On May 14, 6:24 pm, D Peter Maus wrote:
ve3... wrote:
There will be no unanswered insults. If you stop telling lies
about Canada, I will stop telling the truth about the US.

Funny. That's exactly what's happening from down here. Someone
got tired of the gratuitous insults from Canada, and took a 'no insult
unanswered' stance.

So, again, you're bitching because someone hit you back first.

Canadian insults stop, US insults will stop.

Your call.

I suppose you come by it honestly. When your PM levies personal
insults at our President, it kind of becomes national policy.

Get your facts right. Stephen Harper, the Prime Minister, has his
head so far up Bush's ass he needs assistants to hold his shoelaces.
Harper, a well-known neocon, can't call an election because his
ratings are too low. Please cite the occasion where Harper insulted
Bush.

And here we have it. History starts at a random point of
convenience. Go back one PM. The aide to Chretien that called Bush a
moron in an official memo. He resigned. Interestingly, however, he was
not fired by Chretien, nor was the remark retracted by the PM.

So, you get YOUR facts, straight, buckwheat. History doesn't
start with your entry into the fray. And you don't get to start a 'no
insult unanswered' retaliation when it was your countrymen who started
the insult fest first.

"Mii," and "MichaelMoore" have been taking gratuitous shots at
the US since long before you showed your handle here. Had you done your
own homework, gotten your own facts straight, you would have known that.
But then, you're Canadian, and beyond the reach of criticism, aren't you?

No insult unanswered, indeed.

I suppose you don't know that the Anti-US insults came across
the border for weeks unanswered before some members here started let no
insult go unanswered. But then, why would you. Everyone knows there are
no enemies on the Left...or to the North. That you are, by geography, if
not politics, beyond the reach of criticism. And that you must let no
insult go unanswered. If for no other reason than to assert your
righteousness.

No insult unaswered, indeed.

Arrogance in DNA. You let your countrymen lob shots across the
border, and then you object to the response with indignation.

"MOM, he hit me back first."

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""
First of all, I consider your calling me "buckwheat" a gratuitous
insult so you had better get ready for some "incoming."

Who gives a rats ass what *you* consider.

(1) You make a big fuss about "getting your facts right." Why don't
you follow your own advice? "Go back one PM." That would be John
Turner. If you are talking about Chretien, that's back TWO PM's. When
you say "your PM" I think it quite reasonable to think you are
referring to the present PM. And the aide was a "she" not a "he."
Great example of "getting your facts straight."

PM? Does that stand for PussyMan? In CanaDuhs case I guess it does.

(2) You say history starts at a random point of convenience.
Convenient to who? You?

Better him than a dumbass Canuck.

How far back do you want to go? Chretien
didn't like Bush. Diefenbaker didn't like Kennedy. King didn't like
Roosevelt.........

Seems like a pattern! Dumbass Canucks behaving like dumbass Canucks.

Go figure, I don't like dumbass Canucks.


Cartier thought the Jamestown settlers were trailer trash.

Wrong! Canucks are trailer trash.

So what?


You have to set the terms of reference at the beginning of the
discussion, not when you want to shift your argument.

My term of reference is that there seems to be an abundance of dumbass Canucks.

That's why I
ignored your previous rant about terrorists and Al-quieda about which
you objected.

Keep ignoring those folks and there will be a prayer rug in your sorry ass
future.

Aw, what was I thinking! You present is pretty sorry ass!

It had nothing to do with the topic we were discussing.
Please stay on topic and stop dragging red herrings across the thread.

(3) I admit that I didn't know about the early feud, but I speak for
myself so it is not relevant. I don't think Cato got a fair shake just
because he was Canadian and he knew nothing about the earlier feud but
some of the inhabitants of this site are close to psychotic and were
drooling at the prospect of a new victim.

Drooling? Isn't that what you psychotic Canucks spend a lot of time doing?
Drooling over the USofA.

To sum up: I will not initiate an insult but if you think I will
ignore one you have another think coming.

Run along now!

On May 14, 9:22 pm, dxAce wrote:
"ve3..." wrote:
On May 14, 6:24 pm, D Peter Maus wrote:
ve3... wrote:
There will be no unanswered insults. If you stop telling lies
about Canada, I will stop telling the truth about the US.

Funny. That's exactly what's happening from down here. Someone
got tired of the gratuitous insults from Canada, and took a 'no insult
unanswered' stance.

So, again, you're bitching because someone hit you back first.

Canadian insults stop, US insults will stop.

Your call.

I suppose you come by it honestly. When your PM levies personal
insults at our President, it kind of becomes national policy.

Get your facts right. Stephen Harper, the Prime Minister, has his
head so far up Bush's ass he needs assistants to hold his shoelaces.
Harper, a well-known neocon, can't call an election because his
ratings are too low. Please cite the occasion where Harper insulted
Bush.

And here we have it. History starts at a random point of
convenience. Go back one PM. The aide to Chretien that called Bush a
moron in an official memo. He resigned. Interestingly, however, he was
not fired by Chretien, nor was the remark retracted by the PM.

So, you get YOUR facts, straight, buckwheat. History doesn't
start with your entry into the fray. And you don't get to start a 'no
insult unanswered' retaliation when it was your countrymen who started
the insult fest first.

"Mii," and "MichaelMoore" have been taking gratuitous shots at
the US since long before you showed your handle here. Had you done your
own homework, gotten your own facts straight, you would have known that.
But then, you're Canadian, and beyond the reach of criticism, aren't you?

No insult unanswered, indeed.

I suppose you don't know that the Anti-US insults came across
the border for weeks unanswered before some members here started let no
insult go unanswered. But then, why would you. Everyone knows there are
no enemies on the Left...or to the North. That you are, by geography, if
not politics, beyond the reach of criticism. And that you must let no
insult go unanswered. If for no other reason than to assert your
righteousness.

No insult unaswered, indeed.

Arrogance in DNA. You let your countrymen lob shots across the
border, and then you object to the response with indignation.

"MOM, he hit me back first."

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""
First of all, I consider your calling me "buckwheat" a gratuitous
insult so you had better get ready for some "incoming."

Who gives a rats ass what *you* consider.

(1) You make a big fuss about "getting your facts right." Why don't
you follow your own advice? "Go back one PM." That would be John
Turner. If you are talking about Chretien, that's back TWO PM's. When
you say "your PM" I think it quite reasonable to think you are
referring to the present PM. And the aide was a "she" not a "he."
Great example of "getting your facts straight."

PM? Does that stand for PussyMan? In CanaDuhs case I guess it does.

(2) You say history starts at a random point of convenience.
Convenient to who? You?

Better him than a dumbass Canuck.

How far back do you want to go? Chretien
didn't like Bush. Diefenbaker didn't like Kennedy. King didn't like
Roosevelt.........

Seems like a pattern! Dumbass Canucks behaving like dumbass Canucks.

Go figure, I don't like dumbass Canucks.



Cartier thought the Jamestown settlers were trailer trash.

Wrong! Canucks are trailer trash.

So what?

You have to set the terms of reference at the beginning of the
discussion, not when you want to shift your argument.

My term of reference is that there seems to be an abundance of dumbass Canucks.

That's why I
ignored your previous rant about terrorists and Al-quieda about which
you objected.

Keep ignoring those folks and there will be a prayer rug in your sorry ass
future.

Aw, what was I thinking! You present is pretty sorry ass!

It had nothing to do with the topic we were discussing.
Please stay on topic and stop dragging red herrings across the thread.

(3) I admit that I didn't know about the early feud, but I speak for
myself so it is not relevant. I don't think Cato got a fair shake just
because he was Canadian and he knew nothing about the earlier feud but
some of the inhabitants of this site are close to psychotic and were
drooling at the prospect of a new victim.

Drooling? Isn't that what you psychotic Canucks spend a lot of time doing?
Drooling over the USofA.

To sum up: I will not initiate an insult but if you think I will
ignore one you have another think coming.

Run along now!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""
VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007

Fact #2

"I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is
not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal
irresposibility."
David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007

"ve3..." wrote:

On May 14, 9:22 pm, dxAce wrote:
"ve3..." wrote:
On May 14, 6:24 pm, D Peter Maus wrote:
ve3... wrote:
There will be no unanswered insults. If you stop telling lies
about Canada, I will stop telling the truth about the US.

Funny. That's exactly what's happening from down here. Someone
got tired of the gratuitous insults from Canada, and took a 'no insult
unanswered' stance.

So, again, you're bitching because someone hit you back first.

Canadian insults stop, US insults will stop.

Your call.

I suppose you come by it honestly. When your PM levies personal
insults at our President, it kind of becomes national policy.

Get your facts right. Stephen Harper, the Prime Minister, has his
head so far up Bush's ass he needs assistants to hold his shoelaces.
Harper, a well-known neocon, can't call an election because his
ratings are too low. Please cite the occasion where Harper insulted
Bush.

And here we have it. History starts at a random point of
convenience. Go back one PM. The aide to Chretien that called Bush a
moron in an official memo. He resigned. Interestingly, however, he was
not fired by Chretien, nor was the remark retracted by the PM.

So, you get YOUR facts, straight, buckwheat. History doesn't
start with your entry into the fray. And you don't get to start a 'no
insult unanswered' retaliation when it was your countrymen who started
the insult fest first.

"Mii," and "MichaelMoore" have been taking gratuitous shots at
the US since long before you showed your handle here. Had you done your
own homework, gotten your own facts straight, you would have known that.
But then, you're Canadian, and beyond the reach of criticism, aren't you?

No insult unanswered, indeed.

I suppose you don't know that the Anti-US insults came across
the border for weeks unanswered before some members here started let no
insult go unanswered. But then, why would you. Everyone knows there are
no enemies on the Left...or to the North. That you are, by geography, if
not politics, beyond the reach of criticism. And that you must let no
insult go unanswered. If for no other reason than to assert your
righteousness.

No insult unaswered, indeed.

Arrogance in DNA. You let your countrymen lob shots across the
border, and then you object to the response with indignation.

"MOM, he hit me back first."

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """""""""
First of all, I consider your calling me "buckwheat" a gratuitous
insult so you had better get ready for some "incoming."

Who gives a rats ass what *you* consider.

(1) You make a big fuss about "getting your facts right." Why don't
you follow your own advice? "Go back one PM." That would be John
Turner. If you are talking about Chretien, that's back TWO PM's. When
you say "your PM" I think it quite reasonable to think you are
referring to the present PM. And the aide was a "she" not a "he."
Great example of "getting your facts straight."

PM? Does that stand for PussyMan? In CanaDuhs case I guess it does.

(2) You say history starts at a random point of convenience.
Convenient to who? You?

Better him than a dumbass Canuck.

How far back do you want to go? Chretien
didn't like Bush. Diefenbaker didn't like Kennedy. King didn't like
Roosevelt.........

Seems like a pattern! Dumbass Canucks behaving like dumbass Canucks.

Go figure, I don't like dumbass Canucks.



Cartier thought the Jamestown settlers were trailer trash.

Wrong! Canucks are trailer trash.

So what?

You have to set the terms of reference at the beginning of the
discussion, not when you want to shift your argument.

My term of reference is that there seems to be an abundance of dumbass Canucks.

That's why I
ignored your previous rant about terrorists and Al-quieda about which
you objected.

Keep ignoring those folks and there will be a prayer rug in your sorry ass
future.

Aw, what was I thinking! You present is pretty sorry ass!

It had nothing to do with the topic we were discussing.
Please stay on topic and stop dragging red herrings across the thread.

(3) I admit that I didn't know about the early feud, but I speak for
myself so it is not relevant. I don't think Cato got a fair shake just
because he was Canadian and he knew nothing about the earlier feud but
some of the inhabitants of this site are close to psychotic and were
drooling at the prospect of a new victim.

Drooling? Isn't that what you psychotic Canucks spend a lot of time doing?
Drooling over the USofA.

To sum up: I will not initiate an insult but if you think I will
ignore one you have another think coming.

Run along now!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" """"""""
VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007

Fact #2

"I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is
not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal
irresposibility."
David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007

You just don't get it, do you boy? Oh well, that's the dumbass Canuck way!

snipped the irrelevant and immature refuse...


VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007

Fact #2

"I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is
not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal
irresposibility."
David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007


If we weren't chasing them around those caves in Afghanistan, they would be
chasing you around your neighborhood. Hope you got your AK 47 locked and
loaded mr canadian. You really need to get your head out of the sand and
realize these guys are gonna kill you just because you're over here. They
don't care who you are. You should be GRATEFUL that OUR troops are in
Afghanistan keeping them in those caves.
B

Brian O wrote:
snipped the irrelevant and immature refuse...


VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007

Fact #2

"I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is
not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal
irresposibility."
David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007


If we weren't chasing them around those caves in Afghanistan, they would be
chasing you around your neighborhood. Hope you got your AK 47 locked and
loaded mr canadian. You really need to get your head out of the sand and
realize these guys are gonna kill you just because you're over here. They
don't care who you are. You should be GRATEFUL that OUR troops are in
Afghanistan keeping them in those caves.
B




Why are attacks and violence at all-time high if the troops are keeping
the Taliban hiding in caves? There's mo some of them have found a new
home in Pakistan.

I'm in favour of the war against the Taliban and against the war in Iraq
but both operations were done in a half-assed manner.

JB

"John Barnard" wrote in message
news:gdQ2i.188168$DE1.171384@pd7urf2no...
Brian O wrote:
snipped the irrelevant and immature refuse...


VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007

Fact #2

"I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is
not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal
irresposibility."
David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007


If we weren't chasing them around those caves in Afghanistan, they would
be
chasing you around your neighborhood. Hope you got your AK 47 locked
and
loaded mr canadian. You really need to get your head out of the sand
and
realize these guys are gonna kill you just because you're over here.
They
don't care who you are. You should be GRATEFUL that OUR troops are in
Afghanistan keeping them in those caves.
B




Why are attacks and violence at all-time high if the troops are keeping
the Taliban hiding in caves? There's mo some of them have found a new
home in Pakistan.

I'm in favour of the war against the Taliban and against the war in Iraq
but both operations were done in a half-assed manner.

JB
Tell that to the Russians when they tried to go in and get the Taliban out
of the caves. Better yet, lets send you over there to straighten them out.
Bet that would work out real well too huh? You dont seem to get the point at
all. If they are fighting them over there, they arent chasing your sorry
self around over here.
B

Brian O wrote:

"John Barnard" wrote in message
news:gdQ2i.188168$DE1.171384@pd7urf2no...
Brian O wrote:
snipped the irrelevant and immature refuse...


VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007

Fact #2

"I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is
not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal
irresposibility."
David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007


If we weren't chasing them around those caves in Afghanistan, they would
be
chasing you around your neighborhood. Hope you got your AK 47 locked
and
loaded mr canadian. You really need to get your head out of the sand
and
realize these guys are gonna kill you just because you're over here.
They
don't care who you are. You should be GRATEFUL that OUR troops are in
Afghanistan keeping them in those caves.
B




Why are attacks and violence at all-time high if the troops are keeping
the Taliban hiding in caves? There's mo some of them have found a new
home in Pakistan.

I'm in favour of the war against the Taliban and against the war in Iraq
but both operations were done in a half-assed manner.

JB
Tell that to the Russians when they tried to go in and get the Taliban out
of the caves. Better yet, lets send you over there to straighten them out.
Bet that would work out real well too huh? You dont seem to get the point at
all. If they are fighting them over there, they arent chasing your sorry
self around over here.

If they were chasing Barnyard, or any other Canuck around they'd be crying their
eyes out begging for help from the US of A.

WHERE IN THE WORLD IS CARMEN DXECCHIO?

Since DxEcch slavers and drools when he reads my posts, looking for
anything he can make a big deal of, I deliberately inserted a factual
error in the last ten days. DxEcch, possibly into some serious
drinking at the time, missed it.
The award "VE3 EAGLE EYE" will be awarded to the winner. You say
that's not enough? You say you want more? Tell you what I'm gonna do.
I will stay off this website for a month if you find it!!! Now we're
talking serious incentive! Contest ends midnight est Saturday.

dxAce wrote:

Brian O wrote:

"John Barnard" wrote in message
news:gdQ2i.188168$DE1.171384@pd7urf2no...
Brian O wrote:
snipped the irrelevant and immature refuse...


VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007

Fact #2

"I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is
not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal
irresposibility."
David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007

If we weren't chasing them around those caves in Afghanistan, they would
be
chasing you around your neighborhood. Hope you got your AK 47 locked
and
loaded mr canadian. You really need to get your head out of the sand
and
realize these guys are gonna kill you just because you're over here.
They
don't care who you are. You should be GRATEFUL that OUR troops are in
Afghanistan keeping them in those caves.
B



Why are attacks and violence at all-time high if the troops are keeping
the Taliban hiding in caves? There's mo some of them have found a new
home in Pakistan.

I'm in favour of the war against the Taliban and against the war in Iraq
but both operations were done in a half-assed manner.

JB
Tell that to the Russians when they tried to go in and get the Taliban out
of the caves. Better yet, lets send you over there to straighten them out.
Bet that would work out real well too huh? You dont seem to get the point at
all. If they are fighting them over there, they arent chasing your sorry
self around over here.

If they were chasing Barnyard, or any other Canuck around they'd be crying their
eyes out begging for help from the US of A.




Be a cold day in Hell before I'd ask for the USA's help. No sense in
asking help from a country that can't help itself.

JB

Brian O wrote:
"John Barnard" wrote in message
news:gdQ2i.188168$DE1.171384@pd7urf2no...
Brian O wrote:
snipped the irrelevant and immature refuse...


VE3 insult return fact to DxEcch May 16 2007

Fact #2

"I would argue that the most serious threat to the United States is
not someone hiding in a cave in Afghanistan But our own fiscal
irresposibility."
David Walker, comptroller General of the Unied States...March 2007

If we weren't chasing them around those caves in Afghanistan, they would
be
chasing you around your neighborhood. Hope you got your AK 47 locked
and
loaded mr canadian. You really need to get your head out of the sand
and
realize these guys are gonna kill you just because you're over here.
They
don't care who you are. You should be GRATEFUL that OUR troops are in
Afghanistan keeping them in those caves.
B



Why are attacks and violence at all-time high if the troops are keeping
the Taliban hiding in caves? There's mo some of them have found a new
home in Pakistan.

I'm in favour of the war against the Taliban and against the war in Iraq
but both operations were done in a half-assed manner.

JB
Tell that to the Russians when they tried to go in and get the Taliban out
of the caves. Better yet, lets send you over there to straighten them out.
Bet that would work out real well too huh? You dont seem to get the point at
all. If they are fighting them over there, they arent chasing your sorry
self around over here.
B

BO,

Before you get all self-righteous, here's what your glorious Fuehrer did
for the Taliban:

http://www.robertscheer.com/1_natcol...mns/052201.htm

The Taliban came about after the Russians left which is a polite way of
saying that you are another dumb-ass who hasn't a clue about the history
of the region. The Russians were having fun with the Muhadjideen and it
is this group that put the Russians to flight. The Taliban came into
power after taking it from the Muhadjideen.

You're confusing the Taliban with al-Qaeda. Here's a newsflash for you,
dumbo: they aren't one and the same. It's al-Qadea which are the
international terrorists. And just to refresh your memory, your Fuehrer
did say that going after the leader of al-Qaeda, Osama bin Laden, wasn't
a priority.

Your thinking is a perfect example why the war can't be won your way:
nice and quick. And who says that having troops over there is a
guarantee that there aren't any terrorists over here?

JB