Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequencyon an astronomically-low carrier frequency
Radium wrote:
Hi: Please don't be annoyed/offended by my question. Is it mathematically-possible to carry a modulator signal with a frequency of 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 gigacycles every 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond and Ah our village idiot is back again. Also crossposting like all welbehaving village idiots. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequencyon an astronomically-low carrier frequency
Don Bowey wrote:
They don't know how to tie strings together? When some of them have only one end, it becomes bothersome. thankfully my shoelaces were spared this metaphysical ambiguity. mike |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequency on an astronomically-low carrier frequency
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:09:37 GMT, Larry Finger
wrote: Doesn't the space collapse so that we end up with $1...? Space does not collapse except in the vicinity of a black hole. Space also tends to collapse during department reorganizations, where there's never enough space left. There's also the problem of accounting for the missing nulls. Where did they go and what was the exchange rate? Such things are fairly important. For example, did you ever notice that Roman Numerals do not have a zero or a null? There was a half hearted attempt at inventing zero or null (nulla), but fortunately that failed for many centuries. Rome survived much decadence and some really weird Emperors without much difficulty. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_numerals However, no sooner than the Romans adopted the bad habits of their conquered neighbors, which included zero and null, did their civilzation falter and eventually die. At the least, this should be an obvious clue that messing with zero and null should not be taken lightly. -- # Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060 # 831-336-2558 # http://802.11junk.com # http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequency on an astronomically-low carrier frequency
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:38:01 -0700, Radium
wrote: Hi: Please don't be annoyed/offended by my question. I have a very weird question about electromagnetic radiation, carriers, and modulators. Is it mathematically-possible to carry a modulator signal with a frequency of 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 gigacycles every 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond and an amplitude of 1-watt-per-meter-squared on a AM carrier signal whose frequency is 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) nanocycle* every 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 giga- eons and whose amplitude is a minimum of 10^1,000,000,000-to-the- power-10^1,000,000,000 gigaphotons per 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the- power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond? If it is not mathematically-possible, then please explain why. 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) second is an extremely short amount of time. 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the- power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond is even shorter because a nanosecond is shorter than a second. 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 cycles is an extremely large amount of cycles. 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 gigacycles is even more because a gigacycle is more than a cycle. Giga-eon = a billion eons Eon = a billion years Gigacycle = a billion cycles. *nanocycle = billionth of a cycle Gigaphoton = a billion photons 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 -- now that is one large large number. 10^1,000,000,000 = 10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000 So you get: (10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-to-the- power-1,000,000,000) 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) = 10^-(10-to-the- power-1,000,000,000)-to-the-power-(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) 10^-(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-to-the- power-1,000,000,000) is an extremely small number at it equals 10-to- the-power-NEGATIVE-[(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10- to-the-power-1,000,000,000)] No offense but please respond with reasonable answers & keep out the jokes, off-topic nonsense, taunts, insults, and trivializations. I am really interested in this. --- No offense but all you're really interested in is getting unsuspecting people with good hearts to respond to your inane trolls. It's painfully obvious that you're not even a neophyte when it comes to science, so your persistence in wasting everyone's time with your foolishness indicates that you're not looking for answers, only attention. -- JF |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequencyon an astronomically-low carrier frequency
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
Such things are fairly important. For example, did you ever notice that Roman Numerals do not have a zero or a null? There was a half hearted attempt at inventing zero or null (nulla), but fortunately that failed for many centuries. Rome survived much decadence and some really weird Emperors without much difficulty. There's the troubling rumour that Zero fiddled while Rome burned. It's simply not rue. mike |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequency on an astronomically-low carrier frequency
Radium wrote:
Is it mathematically-possible to carry a modulator signal with a frequency of 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 gigacycles every 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond and an amplitude of 1-watt-per-meter-squared on a AM carrier signal whose frequency is 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) nanocycle* every 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 giga- eons and whose amplitude is a minimum of 10^1,000,000,000-to-the- power-10^1,000,000,000 gigaphotons per 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the- power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond? No. If it is not mathematically-possible, then please explain why. No. -- We can't possibly imprison 300 million Americans for not paying their taxes, so let's grant all of them amnesty NOW! |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequencyon an astronomically-low carrier frequency
m II wrote:
There's the troubling rumour that Zero fiddled while Rome burned. It's simply not rue. Correct...the fiddle wasn't invented for another thousand years. [quote Wiki] It was said by Suetonius and Cassius Dio that Nero sang the "Sack of Ilium" in stage costume while the city burned. However, Tacitus' account has Nero in Antium at the time of the fire. Tacitus said that Nero playing his lyre and singing while the city burned was only rumor. Popular legend remembers Nero fiddling-- that is, playing the fiddle-- while Rome burned, but this is an anachronism as the instrument had not yet been invented, and would not be for over 1,000 years. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequency on an astronomically-low carrier frequency
"Martin" wrote in message oups.com... snip Your troll-o-meter is defective, it should be pegged hard in the red zone. Please have it recalibrated to a proper sensitivity. Big laugh -- TKS |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|