David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...



Hey, Edtardo... tell us again about the amateur radio license you had
in
Ecuador. What was that call?


HC1DG

OK, tell us what tests you had to take. And can you provide a copy of the
license?

There was no test. Licenses for anything in Ecuador were "actas" on European
size legal paper. Of course I have not saved a ham license from the 60's (I
don't even have my first FCC 1st ticket) and probably most people don't.

But you had a copy of it on your website fairly recently...

Showing the name: David Frackelton Gleason



What I am saying is that most anyone who wanted a ham license could ask for
one and get it. There is no testing, just some fees and a "fee" for
processing. The limiting factor in Ecuador was that the average annual
income per household then was less than $1000 a year, and imported ham gear
could easily cost $2 thousand or more. Any "luxury" item had as much as 200%
of the CIF value plus foreign exchange charges, etc. Not many people could
become hams there.

You're full of ****!

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...



Hey, Edtardo... tell us again about the amateur radio license you
had
in
Ecuador. What was that call?


HC1DG

OK, tell us what tests you had to take. And can you provide a copy of
the
license?

There was no test. Licenses for anything in Ecuador were "actas" on
European
size legal paper. Of course I have not saved a ham license from the 60's
(I
don't even have my first FCC 1st ticket) and probably most people don't.

But you had a copy of it on your website fairly recently...

That was a renewal. The original was issued in DC at the old M Street FCC
location in '69 or '70.

What I am saying is that most anyone who wanted a ham license could ask
for
one and get it. There is no testing, just some fees and a "fee" for
processing. The limiting factor in Ecuador was that the average annual
income per household then was less than $1000 a year, and imported ham
gear
could easily cost $2 thousand or more. Any "luxury" item had as much as
200%
of the CIF value plus foreign exchange charges, etc. Not many people
could
become hams there.

You're full of ****!

Ok, you tell me how many people in Ecuador could afford to be hams?

And anyone in Ecuador who wanted to get out of any requirement could,
easily, with the right donation. That includes tests, which I do not recall
anyone ever even mentioning to me.

On Sep 8, 2:46 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...







David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

Hey, Edtardo... tell us again about the amateur radio license you
had
in
Ecuador. What was that call?

HC1DG

OK, tell us what tests you had to take. And can you provide a copy of
the
license?

There was no test. Licenses for anything in Ecuador were "actas" on
European
size legal paper. Of course I have not saved a ham license from the 60's
(I
don't even have my first FCC 1st ticket) and probably most people don't.

But you had a copy of it on your website fairly recently...

That was a renewal. The original was issued in DC at the old M Street FCC
location in '69 or '70.

What I am saying is that most anyone who wanted a ham license could ask
for
one and get it. There is no testing, just some fees and a "fee" for
processing. The limiting factor in Ecuador was that the average annual
income per household then was less than $1000 a year, and imported ham
gear
could easily cost $2 thousand or more. Any "luxury" item had as much as
200%
of the CIF value plus foreign exchange charges, etc. Not many people
could
become hams there.

You're full of ****!

Ok, you tell me how many people in Ecuador could afford to be hams?

And anyone in Ecuador who wanted to get out of any requirement could,
easily, with the right donation. That includes tests, which I do not recall
anyone ever even mentioning to me.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So, does this colloidal silver crap really work? What's best,
colloidal silver or the super hgh?

On Sep 8, 2:46 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...







David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

Hey, Edtardo... tell us again about the amateur radio license you
had
in
Ecuador. What was that call?

HC1DG

OK, tell us what tests you had to take. And can you provide a copy of
the
license?

There was no test. Licenses for anything in Ecuador were "actas" on
European
size legal paper. Of course I have not saved a ham license from the 60's
(I
don't even have my first FCC 1st ticket) and probably most people don't.

But you had a copy of it on your website fairly recently...

That was a renewal. The original was issued in DC at the old M Street FCC
location in '69 or '70.

What I am saying is that most anyone who wanted a ham license could ask
for
one and get it. There is no testing, just some fees and a "fee" for
processing. The limiting factor in Ecuador was that the average annual
income per household then was less than $1000 a year, and imported ham
gear
could easily cost $2 thousand or more. Any "luxury" item had as much as
200%
of the CIF value plus foreign exchange charges, etc. Not many people
could
become hams there.

You're full of ****!

Ok, you tell me how many people in Ecuador could afford to be hams?

And anyone in Ecuador who wanted to get out of any requirement could,
easily, with the right donation. That includes tests, which I do not recall
anyone ever even mentioning to me.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Did they have the Super Prostate Formula in Ecuador in those days?

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...



Hey, Edtardo... tell us again about the amateur radio license you
had
in
Ecuador. What was that call?


HC1DG

OK, tell us what tests you had to take. And can you provide a copy of
the
license?

There was no test. Licenses for anything in Ecuador were "actas" on
European
size legal paper. Of course I have not saved a ham license from the 60's
(I
don't even have my first FCC 1st ticket) and probably most people don't.

But you had a copy of it on your website fairly recently...

That was a renewal. The original was issued in DC at the old M Street FCC
location in '69 or '70.

Prove it... not what you stated previously. I'll look it up if you desire,
prancer.



What I am saying is that most anyone who wanted a ham license could ask
for
one and get it. There is no testing, just some fees and a "fee" for
processing. The limiting factor in Ecuador was that the average annual
income per household then was less than $1000 a year, and imported ham
gear
could easily cost $2 thousand or more. Any "luxury" item had as much as
200%
of the CIF value plus foreign exchange charges, etc. Not many people
could
become hams there.

You're full of ****!

Ok, you tell me how many people in Ecuador could afford to be hams?

Not you!



And anyone in Ecuador who wanted to get out of any requirement could,
easily, with the right donation. That includes tests, which I do not recall
anyone ever even mentioning to me.

You don't recall anything that might be pertinent.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

That was a renewal. The original was issued in DC at the old M Street FCC
location in '69 or '70.

Prove it... not what you stated previously. I'll look it up if you desire,
prancer.

Prove what? A renewal means I had the licence prior to the renewal. The
renewal was issued in '74 at San Juan, meaning the prior one was issued in
1969.



What I am saying is that most anyone who wanted a ham license could
ask
for
one and get it. There is no testing, just some fees and a "fee" for
processing. The limiting factor in Ecuador was that the average annual
income per household then was less than $1000 a year, and imported
ham
gear
could easily cost $2 thousand or more. Any "luxury" item had as much
as
200%
of the CIF value plus foreign exchange charges, etc. Not many people
could
become hams there.

You're full of ****!

Ok, you tell me how many people in Ecuador could afford to be hams?

Not you!

If I could buy 10 kw AM transmitters or run an FM with no spots for a year,
I could buy a Heathkit.



And anyone in Ecuador who wanted to get out of any requirement could,
easily, with the right donation. That includes tests, which I do not
recall
anyone ever even mentioning to me.

You don't recall anything that might be pertinent.


You apply your "Ugly American" standard to other nations. The economy, the
culture, the language... nothing is the same or comparable.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

That was a renewal. The original was issued in DC at the old M Street FCC
location in '69 or '70.

Prove it... not what you stated previously. I'll look it up if you desire,
prancer.

Prove what? A renewal means I had the licence prior to the renewal. The
renewal was issued in '74 at San Juan, meaning the prior one was issued in
1969.



What I am saying is that most anyone who wanted a ham license could
ask
for
one and get it. There is no testing, just some fees and a "fee" for
processing. The limiting factor in Ecuador was that the average annual
income per household then was less than $1000 a year, and imported
ham
gear
could easily cost $2 thousand or more. Any "luxury" item had as much
as
200%
of the CIF value plus foreign exchange charges, etc. Not many people
could
become hams there.

You're full of ****!

Ok, you tell me how many people in Ecuador could afford to be hams?

Not you!

If I could buy 10 kw AM transmitters or run an FM with no spots for a year,
I could buy a Heathkit.



And anyone in Ecuador who wanted to get out of any requirement could,
easily, with the right donation. That includes tests, which I do not
recall
anyone ever even mentioning to me.

You don't recall anything that might be pertinent.


You apply your "Ugly American" standard to other nations. The economy, the
culture, the language... nothing is the same or comparable.

You're full of ****, Edweenie... check with the State Department.

You are nothing more than a hot air fairy.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


You apply your "Ugly American" standard to other nations. The economy,
the
culture, the language... nothing is the same or comparable.

You're full of ****, Edweenie... check with the State Department.

The US government does not licence ham s or radio stations or anything
innthe soverign nation of Ecuador. Despite what you think, the US government
is pretty clueless about most foreign nations and cultuures, which is why so
many hate us or want to attack us.

You are nothing more than a hot air fairy.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


You apply your "Ugly American" standard to other nations. The economy,
the
culture, the language... nothing is the same or comparable.

You're full of ****, Edweenie... check with the State Department.

The US government does not licence ham s or radio stations or anything
innthe soverign nation of Ecuador. Despite what you think, the US government
is pretty clueless about most foreign nations and cultuures, which is why so
many hate us or want to attack us.

Are you sucking down tequila? Your spelling is rapidly deteriorating.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


You apply your "Ugly American" standard to other nations. The economy,
the
culture, the language... nothing is the same or comparable.

You're full of ****, Edweenie... check with the State Department.

The US government does not licence ham s or radio stations or anything
innthe soverign nation of Ecuador. Despite what you think, the US government
is pretty clueless about most foreign nations and cultuures, which is why so
many hate us or want to attack us.

You are nothing more than a hot air fairy.

But still, you are a hot air fairy!