Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 8, 3:10 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: That was a renewal. The original was issued in DC at the old M Street FCC location in '69 or '70. Prove it... not what you stated previously. I'll look it up if you desire, prancer. Prove what? A renewal means I had the licence prior to the renewal. The renewal was issued in '74 at San Juan, meaning the prior one was issued in 1969. What I am saying is that most anyone who wanted a ham license could ask for one and get it. There is no testing, just some fees and a "fee" for processing. The limiting factor in Ecuador was that the average annual income per household then was less than $1000 a year, and imported ham gear could easily cost $2 thousand or more. Any "luxury" item had as much as 200% of the CIF value plus foreign exchange charges, etc. Not many people could become hams there. You're full of ****! Ok, you tell me how many people in Ecuador could afford to be hams? Not you! If I could buy 10 kw AM transmitters or run an FM with no spots for a year, I could buy a Heathkit. And anyone in Ecuador who wanted to get out of any requirement could, easily, with the right donation. That includes tests, which I do not recall anyone ever even mentioning to me. You don't recall anything that might be pertinent. You apply your "Ugly American" standard to other nations. The economy, the culture, the language... nothing is the same or comparable.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - That's right. 3 isn't even prime in South America. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|