On Sep 25, 11:55 pm, Steve wrote:
Hey Tardo, on that rather sad exercise in narcissism that you call
your "website", you say you spent some time in college-level
journalism seminars at Michigan State University, and you display an
image of something that LOOKS like a diploma, but which you refer to
as a "certificate of achievement".

So did you graduate from Michigan State with an actual degree? If so,
why don't you come out and say it? If not, why would you bother, after
all these many years, to roll out your ultimately insignificant
"certificate of achievement"? Inquiring minds want to know...

No, Eduardo is just a high-school dropout.

"IBOCcrock" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Sep 25, 11:55 pm, Steve wrote:
Hey Tardo, on that rather sad exercise in narcissism that you call
your "website", you say you spent some time in college-level
journalism seminars at Michigan State University, and you display an
image of something that LOOKS like a diploma, but which you refer to
as a "certificate of achievement".

So did you graduate from Michigan State with an actual degree? If so,
why don't you come out and say it? If not, why would you bother, after
all these many years, to roll out your ultimately insignificant
"certificate of achievement"? Inquiring minds want to know...

No, Eduardo is just a high-school dropout.


And one who later went back to college and did fairly well at it.

On Sep 26, 2:38 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

And one who later went back to college and did fairly well at it.

Which is why David is working at a radio group and the rest of you are
just........neh neh neh.

Steph

"Stephanie Weil" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Sep 26, 2:38 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

And one who later went back to college and did fairly well at it.

Which is why David is working at a radio group and the rest of you are
just........neh neh neh.


LOL. I'm not sure most people want to work at the den of insecurity that is
radio, but what you say is both blunt and to the point.

On Sep 26, 3:58 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Stephanie Weil" wrote in message

ups.com...

On Sep 26, 2:38 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

And one who later went back to college and did fairly well at it.

Which is why David is working at a radio group and the rest of you are
just........neh neh neh.

LOL. I'm not sure most people want to work at the den of insecurity that is
radio, but what you say is both blunt and to the point.

Are you sure you aren't just projecting your own personal insecurities
onto your profession?

"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Sep 26, 3:58 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Stephanie Weil" wrote in message

ups.com...

On Sep 26, 2:38 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

And one who later went back to college and did fairly well at it.

Which is why David is working at a radio group and the rest of you are
just........neh neh neh.

LOL. I'm not sure most people want to work at the den of insecurity that
is
radio, but what you say is both blunt and to the point.

Are you sure you aren't just projecting your own personal insecurities
onto your profession?


No, radio is relatively insecure because there is no such thing as tenure,
and stations change format and staff quite constantly. Add to that the fact
that progress is generally attained by moving from smaller to bigger
markets, over and over, rather than within a single station, and you have
plenty of instability. Did I mention most programming jobs are also very
ratings-dependent and of limited security?

On Sep 26, 4:15 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

oups.com...





On Sep 26, 3:58 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Stephanie Weil" wrote in message

roups.com...

On Sep 26, 2:38 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

And one who later went back to college and did fairly well at it.

Which is why David is working at a radio group and the rest of you are
just........neh neh neh.

LOL. I'm not sure most people want to work at the den of insecurity that
is
radio, but what you say is both blunt and to the point.

Are you sure you aren't just projecting your own personal insecurities
onto your profession?

No, radio is relatively insecure because there is no such thing as tenure,
and stations change format and staff quite constantly.

This doesn't distinguish radio from the vast majority of business
endeavors.

Add to that the fact
that progress is generally attained by moving from smaller to bigger
markets, over and over, rather than within a single station, and you have
plenty of instability. Did I mention most programming jobs are also very
ratings-dependent and of limited security?- Hide quoted text -

Things are rough all over, bub. You perform or you take it on the
arches. That's not just radio: it's business.

On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:51:32 -0000, Stephanie Weil
wrote:

On Sep 26, 2:38 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

And one who later went back to college and did fairly well at it.

Which is why David is working at a radio group and the rest of you are
just........neh neh neh.

Steph
well said

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/

and get ou the newly recovered KB9RQZ.blogspot.com as well

G

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

David Frackelton Gleason, the guy who hates radio listeners and fraudulently
poses as 'Eduardo', wrote:

"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Sep 26, 4:15 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

No, radio is relatively insecure because there is no such thing as
tenure,
and stations change format and staff quite constantly.

This doesn't distinguish radio from the vast majority of business
endeavors.

Radio is more like the rest of the entertainment business... you may do a
sitcom for a season or two... and then not work for a year or more. There
are just no guarantees, and progress is determined by moving up in market
size in radio... most places there is no internal career path on the
programming side. .

Awwww, poor little fake Hispanic.