David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Frackelton Gleason, who is a bit like a $3 bill, wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...

You make a lot of crap up including about who you are. My IP address is
in every post I make. The city I live in is in my signature. There is
not much anonymous about me. At least what you know about me is true,
which is not something you can say about yourself Mr. Pretender.

All I know about you is that you are in Venchurra County, and have no
facts
about how radio is used.

All we know about you Edweenie is that you have little or no documentation
to
back up your statements!

Oh, right! I forgot that you claim stations are listened to _in_ your county
that.... I hate to break it to you... aren't. The little listening to LA
stations in Ventura County is mostly in the area right on the LA County
border, or in cars and at work inside LA County. All I have is the data for
the last 10 years from Arbitron for both markets, based in total on about
350,000 diaries and something like 5 million listening incidents.

The one with no documentation is you, as you base your comments on what you
can get on your radios.

Sorry retard boy! You were replying to the wrong person. I've not been in Ventura
County for 27 years!

dxAce

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Frackelton Gleason, who is a bit like a $3 bill, wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message

t...

You make a lot of crap up including about who you are. My IP
address is in every post I make. The city I live in is in my
signature. There is not much anonymous about me. At least what
you know about me is true, which is not something you can say
about yourself Mr. Pretender.

All I know about you is that you are in Venchurra County, and
have no facts about how radio is used.

All we know about you Edweenie is that you have little or no
documentation to back up your statements!

Oh, right! I forgot that you claim stations are listened to _in_
your county that.... I hate to break it to you... aren't. The
little listening to LA stations in Ventura County is mostly in the
area right on the LA County border, or in cars and at work inside
LA County. All I have is the data for the last 10 years from
Arbitron for both markets, based in total on about 350,000 diaries
and something like 5 million listening incidents.

The one with no documentation is you, as you base your comments on
what you can get on your radios.

Sorry retard boy! You were replying to the wrong person. I've not
been in Ventura County for 27 years!

Not mention the fact that he does not know what documentation means.

Hey Eduardo, you better crack open that dictionary.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

David Eduardo wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
.
..
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

I know the name. I just don't believe the poster boy using his name
is
Orban.

Go ask on ba.broadcast if it is really him.
And what will be the result. Other handles coming back saying sure
that's him?

Well, this isn't about Bob, this is about you.

The newsgroup regulars are well known and identified. None hide behind
screen names, as you do.
You mean like you for instance?

I use my given names, Identify who I am frequently by reference or by link
to my website. If I look for a Telemon or Telamon or Taliman or whatever, I
get nothing of use.



Given Telamon's attitude, Taliban would be more appropriate ;-)

JB

"John Barnard" wrote in message
news:V8sOi.2503$Da.935@pd7urf1no...

Given Telamon's attitude, Taliban would be more appropriate ;-)


Jajaja. That is funny.

On Oct 8, 12:58 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"John Barnard" wrote in message

news:V8sOi.2503$Da.935@pd7urf1no...



Given Telamon's attitude, Taliban would be more appropriate ;-)

Jajaja. That is funny.

What's funny is the schoolyard mentality you bring to every group you
post in. Assuming you work in broadcasting at all, it'd be interesting
to know what your colleagues think when they see the nature and
magnitude of your usenet activities. You're very fortunate that your
desperate need for attention will probably allow you to tolerate any
embarrassment, no matter how extreme.

Steve wrote:

On Oct 8, 12:58 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"John Barnard" wrote in message

news:V8sOi.2503$Da.935@pd7urf1no...



Given Telamon's attitude, Taliban would be more appropriate ;-)

Jajaja. That is funny.

What's funny is the schoolyard mentality you bring to every group you
post in. Assuming you work in broadcasting at all, it'd be interesting
to know what your colleagues think when they see the nature and
magnitude of your usenet activities. You're very fortunate that your
desperate need for attention will probably allow you to tolerate any
embarrassment, no matter how extreme.

I think he's on full prance mode today.

"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 8, 12:58 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"John Barnard" wrote in message

news:V8sOi.2503$Da.935@pd7urf1no...



Given Telamon's attitude, Taliban would be more appropriate ;-)

Jajaja. That is funny.

What's funny is the schoolyard mentality you bring to every group you
post in. Assuming you work in broadcasting at all, it'd be interesting
to know what your colleagues think when they see the nature and
magnitude of your usenet activities.

Let's see... even if I posted 20 times a day, at maybe a minute or two a
post, that is a tiny bit of time. Considering one only is supposed to work 8
hours a day, there seems enough left over for a few posts.

You're very fortunate that your
desperate need for attention will probably allow you to tolerate any
embarrassment, no matter how extreme.


There is nothing embarrassing about defending a point of view, even one
unpopular in certain circles.

On Oct 8, 2:20 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

oups.com...

On Oct 8, 12:58 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"John Barnard" wrote in message

news:V8sOi.2503$Da.935@pd7urf1no...

Given Telamon's attitude, Taliban would be more appropriate ;-)

Jajaja. That is funny.

What's funny is the schoolyard mentality you bring to every group you
post in. Assuming you work in broadcasting at all, it'd be interesting
to know what your colleagues think when they see the nature and
magnitude of your usenet activities.

Let's see... even if I posted 20 times a day, at maybe a minute or two a
post, that is a tiny bit of time. Considering one only is supposed to work 8
hours a day, there seems enough left over for a few posts.

Of course I'm not talking about time. None of your colleagues
(assuming you have any) would care to count the minutes you spend on
usenet, but they would be plenty surprised by the nature of your
posts. Even more interesting to them would be the more general project
of planting yourself in this group, doing your best to initiate
squabbles by spamming the group with one off-topic post after another,
and then engaging in your little, sissy "battles" about IBOC or
whatever is convenient. You actually alternate between sounding like a
12 year old on a playground and the old lady who lives down the street
from me, the one who spoils for any kind of "dispute" she can
generate---anything to bring someone into her life so that she's the
focus of their attention.


You're very fortunate that your
desperate need for attention will probably allow you to tolerate any
embarrassment, no matter how extreme.

There is nothing embarrassing about defending a point of view, even one
unpopular in certain circles.

'Nuff said.

David Eduardo wrote:

"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Oct 8, 12:58 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"John Barnard" wrote in message

news:V8sOi.2503$Da.935@pd7urf1no...



Given Telamon's attitude, Taliban would be more appropriate ;-)

Jajaja. That is funny.

What's funny is the schoolyard mentality you bring to every group you
post in. Assuming you work in broadcasting at all, it'd be interesting
to know what your colleagues think when they see the nature and
magnitude of your usenet activities.

Let's see... even if I posted 20 times a day, at maybe a minute or two a
post, that is a tiny bit of time. Considering one only is supposed to work 8
hours a day, there seems enough left over for a few posts.

You're very fortunate that your
desperate need for attention will probably allow you to tolerate any
embarrassment, no matter how extreme.


There is nothing embarrassing about defending a point of view, even one
unpopular in certain circles.

Like the fact that you're a proven pathological liar?

On Oct 8, 2:37 pm, dxAce wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message
roups.com...
On Oct 8, 12:58 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"John Barnard" wrote in message

news:V8sOi.2503$Da.935@pd7urf1no...

Given Telamon's attitude, Taliban would be more appropriate ;-)

Jajaja. That is funny.

What's funny is the schoolyard mentality you bring to every group you
post in. Assuming you work in broadcasting at all, it'd be interesting
to know what your colleagues think when they see the nature and
magnitude of your usenet activities.

Let's see... even if I posted 20 times a day, at maybe a minute or two a
post, that is a tiny bit of time. Considering one only is supposed to work 8
hours a day, there seems enough left over for a few posts.

You're very fortunate that your
desperate need for attention will probably allow you to tolerate any
embarrassment, no matter how extreme.

There is nothing embarrassing about defending a point of view, even one
unpopular in certain circles.

Like the fact that you're a proven pathological liar?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It hadn't occurred to me, but I'll bet his colleagues would be plenty
surprised by the lies he's told here. My guess is that he's more
careful in his life "offline", but people like this always forget how
easily the line between on and offline gets crossed. Sooner or later
this kind of crap will catch up with him. Like I said, though, I'll
bet that he can tolerate embarrassment much better than most people
because even embarrassment is a source of what he needs more than
anything: attention. Maybe this is a good thing...hard to say. Trying
to distinguish good from bad scenarios is pretty meaningless in this
context.