iBiquity HD Radio Status
 

"Steve" wrote in message
...

Perhaps what one regards as "listenable" is a function of how
interesting the content is.

When content is listened to when the signal exceeds a certain level and not
listened to when it does not pretty conclusively shows the issue is signal,
not content.

iBiquity HD Radio Status
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

Can't you even fake a letter 'tard boy?


Like all the DX you have apparently faked by listening on the Internet or
stealing reports from online posts?

I don't do that. Only you do, and then you swear, cuss and insult to
obfuscate when anyone is close to figuring you out.

iBiquity HD Radio Status
 

David Eduardo wrote:


I was interested
several years ago in the recent antagonism towards broadcasting by DXers.
That is certainly on-topic.


And that's easily explained. Broadcasters stopped serving DXers.
Ignored them. In some cases rebuked them for contacting them with
reception reports.

You're fans don't turn on you without cause. You have to run them
off. If you're looking for reasons why DXers became antagonistic, take
a look at the attitude shown them by broadcasters.

It's no mystery.

iBiquity HD Radio Status
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


And 'Eduardo' is going to come up with so many lies as to why I won't get
any letter
from his *daughter* it'll blow your mind!


The answered is simple. An attorney employed by the government is not going
to have a "law firm" letterhead.

iBiquity HD Radio Status
 

On Jan 28, 1:55*pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

...
On Jan 27, 10:13 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:





"Steve" wrote in message

...
On Jan 27, 9:53 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message

...

Hey, have the bitch send me a letter, on the firms letterhead. Like I
said
before, I expect to receive it in the next two weeks. Pretty easy, eh.
'Eduardo'?

You ****ing drunk maniac,

Aw, did dxAce huwt your wittle feewings? Poor wittle Edwawdo...

There is no need to call somebody he does not know a "kunt" or a "bitch"
and
so on. He's just drunk, so I guess he was a nasty piece of work in the
service... probably why he is not there any more. .

Nor is there any need to troll newsgroups. But someone who chooses to
troll newsgroups shouldn't act 'wronged and wounded' at the first hint
of rough treatment.

I can't think of a ng that has more off-topic posts. As a DXer with over
2200 veries and 87 countries, 45-year member of NRC, founding member of
IRCA, and general member over the years of NASWA, NNRC, MWC, etc., as well
as having held (and never activated) an actual SW license, I was interested
several years ago in the recent antagonism towards broadcasting by DXers.
That is certainly on-topic.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Actually, that's not even close to being on topic.

iBiquity HD Radio Status
 

On Jan 28, 1:58*pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

...
On Jan 28, 2:59 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message

If you really think that, you are a miserable excuse for a human being and
a
disgrace for all those that wore uniforms before and after you.

I gave you a half dozen links showing what my daughter does, when she
passed
the bar, a report that shows her as the director of the legal department
of
a very large Commonwealth government entity, and even indication of her
scholarship awards.

What reason do we have to believe that this person is your daughter?
You've been caught in numerous lies in this group. Any presumption
that you're telling the truth has consequently gone straight out the
window. The fact that you found someone whose name includes "Gleason"
and is an attorney does not impress. I'm sure there are many of
these.

No, I have been accused of lies, none of which accusations have borne fruit.

iBiquity HD Radio Status
 

On Jan 28, 1:59*pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

...

Perhaps what one regards as "listenable" is a function of how
interesting the content is.

When content is listened to when the signal exceeds a certain level and not
listened to when it does not pretty conclusively shows the issue is signal,
not content.

When listeners tolerate noise for access to quality content and do not
tolerate it for access to crap, this pretty conclusively shows the
issue is with content, not signal.

iBiquity HD Radio Status
 

On Jan 28, 2:01*pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...



Can't you even fake a letter 'tard boy?

Like all the DX you have apparently faked by listening on the Internet or
stealing reports from online posts?

I don't do that. Only you do, and then you swear, cuss and insult to
obfuscate when anyone is close to figuring you out.

You fake all kinds of stuff, as established time and time again. Yawn.

iBiquity HD Radio Status
 

On Jan 28, 2:02*pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...



And 'Eduardo' is going to come up with so many lies as to why I won't get
any letter
from his *daughter* it'll blow your mind!

The answered is simple. An attorney employed *by the government is not going
to have a "law firm" letterhead.

Has she got a phone? Does she know how to use it?

iBiquity HD Radio Status
 

"Steve" wrote in message
...
On Jan 28, 11:10 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message

news:telamon_spamshield-

As I said before, those who participate in the radio ratings, year
after
year, thousands after thousands just in your county, don't find what
you
consider to be listenable to be that, and they don't listen in droves.

Those thousands and thousands of people don't exist. None listen of them
listen to my radio. Now if you want to draw some false conclusions based
on some marketing data about what is or is not listenable on my radio
you go right ahead and continue to live in your fantasy world.

The world of commercial radio is based on ratings, not "the ability to
hear"
a station. There is no fantasy involved. Each person in the sample
represents a thousand or so non-participants, and the results are the
basis
for the revenue of each significant station. The fact is, there is pretty
much no listening to stations as shown in the ratings all over the US when
signals are not extremely strong and noise-free

Perhaps results would be different if all those stations weren't
broadcasting crap?

we are talking of stations that get good ratings inside the good signal
area. and this is true all over the country in every market.