Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Eduardo wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... You obviously know less about component marketing than you pretend to know. Really? What have I written that shows you I don't know what I write about here? This article was written last spring 3/1/07. Everything written is being proposed about the "chip". Radio World is the authoritative technical publication for broadcasting, and has been for some time. If their reporters say they saw the chip working in a prototype, the chip exists and works. If they say it is shipping, it´s shipping. References to a TI project that did not develop several years ago are irrelevant and an attempt to obfuscate. There is nothing on the SiPort or Sansung web sites to indicate that a "chip" that has been developed or shipping. There is nothing on the Radio World web site to indicate that they saw a prototype working. All statements I have read on the Radio World web site were promotional forward looking statements. The website has little abstracts of the magazine content, but to get the full magazine, you have to qualify. Get the magazine if you can. It answers all your questions. Now I want a link or a quote to the contrary otherwise shut the hell up. I'm not taking your word for it. It is put up or shut up time Eduardo. No, it's time for you to stop objecting to every piece of evidence by asking for more evidence or by disbelieving actual facts. Radio World is the journal of record for radio broadcast engineering. If you are so insignificant as to not even be able to obtain the magazine, that's not my problem. All the information about HD developments shown at the CES are in Radio World, in an edition with several lengthy articles about HD developments that is so extensive that it discusses the power requirements of each of the chips in different operating situations. http://www.eetimes.com/TechSearch/Se...&Search=Search A search here reveals no revolutionary developments in the HD Radio/IBOC chip universe. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
dave wrote:
David Eduardo wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... You obviously know less about component marketing than you pretend to know. Really? What have I written that shows you I don't know what I write about here? This article was written last spring 3/1/07. Everything written is being proposed about the "chip". Radio World is the authoritative technical publication for broadcasting, and has been for some time. If their reporters say they saw the chip working in a prototype, the chip exists and works. If they say it is shipping, it´s shipping. References to a TI project that did not develop several years ago are irrelevant and an attempt to obfuscate. There is nothing on the SiPort or Sansung web sites to indicate that a "chip" that has been developed or shipping. There is nothing on the Radio World web site to indicate that they saw a prototype working. All statements I have read on the Radio World web site were promotional forward looking statements. The website has little abstracts of the magazine content, but to get the full magazine, you have to qualify. Get the magazine if you can. It answers all your questions. Now I want a link or a quote to the contrary otherwise shut the hell up. I'm not taking your word for it. It is put up or shut up time Eduardo. No, it's time for you to stop objecting to every piece of evidence by asking for more evidence or by disbelieving actual facts. Radio World is the journal of record for radio broadcast engineering. If you are so insignificant as to not even be able to obtain the magazine, that's not my problem. All the information about HD developments shown at the CES are in Radio World, in an edition with several lengthy articles about HD developments that is so extensive that it discusses the power requirements of each of the chips in different operating situations. http://www.eetimes.com/TechSearch/Se...&Search=Search A search here reveals no revolutionary developments in the HD Radio/IBOC chip universe. Using the right search criteria ("digital radio")can lead you to this article. http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.j...leID=205205995 Note the reference to Samsung in the article. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 23, 6:17*am, craigm wrote:
dave wrote: David Eduardo wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message .... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message .... You obviously know less about component marketing than you pretend to know. Really? What have I written that shows you I don't know what I write about here? This article was written last spring 3/1/07. Everything written is being proposed about the "chip". Radio World is the authoritative technical publication for broadcasting, and has been for some time. If their reporters say they saw the chip working in a prototype, the chip exists and works. If they say it is shipping, it´s shipping. References to a TI project that did not develop several years ago are irrelevant and an attempt to obfuscate. There is nothing on the SiPort or Sansung web sites to indicate that a "chip" that has been developed or shipping. There is nothing on the Radio World web site to indicate that they saw a prototype working. All statements I have read on the Radio World web site were promotional forward looking statements. The website has little abstracts of the magazine content, but to get the full magazine, you have to qualify. Get the magazine if you can. It answers all your questions. Now I want a link or a quote to the contrary otherwise shut the hell up. I'm not taking your word for it. It is put up or shut up time Eduardo. No, it's time for you to stop objecting to every piece of evidence by asking for more evidence or by disbelieving actual facts. Radio World is the journal of record for radio broadcast engineering. If you are so insignificant as to not even be able to obtain the magazine, that's not my problem. All the information about HD developments shown at the CES are in Radio World, in an edition with several lengthy articles about HD developments that is so extensive that it discusses the power requirements of each of the chips in different operating situations. http://www.eetimes.com/TechSearch/Se...EE+Times&Site+... A search here reveals no revolutionary developments in the HD Radio/IBOC chip universe. - - Using the right search criteria ("digital radio") - can lead you to this article. - http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.j...leID=205205995 - Note the reference to Samsung in the article. -Note- Dropping "Telamon" from the Subject-Line -because- We now have a Second Source and a Second Sourcer for the "Samsung Chip" -ps- It could be real . . . A Big "TYVM" to CraigM for his Post and Info ~ RHF IBOC : Real News About The Samsung "HD" Radio Chip {Second Source} http://groups.google.com/group/hd-ra...1edb7fc7b535c1 EE Times : Terrestrial Digital [HD] Radio Goes Mobile http://tinyurl.com/26vkeu -by- Junko Yoshida CopyRight © 2008 CMP Media LLC Part 2 - From the Car to the PalmTop http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.j...5205995&pgno=2 Here is a Related Link : http://tinyurl.com/2hhrua Data and Audio Processing for HD Radio -by- John Gardner, Texas Instruments like it or not - the truth is out there ~ RHF |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
craigm wrote:
Looks to me like the Samsung chipset is klunky compared to the competitor: "...Samsung's HD Radio baseband processor, based on Tensilica's programmable core, integrates the baseband, memory, SDRAM and flash in a system-in-package measuring 9 x 9 mm. Including the companion RF chip, the chip set's total power consumption is 150 mW... ....Sunder Velamuri, vice president of marketing at SiPort, said power dissipation of the mixed-signal device is expected to be "around 100 mW in typical configurations." He added that the chip, essentially "a software radio," can tune and demodulate not only analog AM/FM and HD Radio but also DAB and DMB-T, making it ready for the global market. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. is fabricating the device..." |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
craigm wrote: dave wrote: David Eduardo wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... You obviously know less about component marketing than you pretend to know. Really? What have I written that shows you I don't know what I write about here? This article was written last spring 3/1/07. Everything written is being proposed about the "chip". Radio World is the authoritative technical publication for broadcasting, and has been for some time. If their reporters say they saw the chip working in a prototype, the chip exists and works. If they say it is shipping, it´s shipping. References to a TI project that did not develop several years ago are irrelevant and an attempt to obfuscate. There is nothing on the SiPort or Sansung web sites to indicate that a "chip" that has been developed or shipping. There is nothing on the Radio World web site to indicate that they saw a prototype working. All statements I have read on the Radio World web site were promotional forward looking statements. The website has little abstracts of the magazine content, but to get the full magazine, you have to qualify. Get the magazine if you can. It answers all your questions. Now I want a link or a quote to the contrary otherwise shut the hell up. I'm not taking your word for it. It is put up or shut up time Eduardo. No, it's time for you to stop objecting to every piece of evidence by asking for more evidence or by disbelieving actual facts. Radio World is the journal of record for radio broadcast engineering. If you are so insignificant as to not even be able to obtain the magazine, that's not my problem. All the information about HD developments shown at the CES are in Radio World, in an edition with several lengthy articles about HD developments that is so extensive that it discusses the power requirements of each of the chips in different operating situations. http://www.eetimes.com/TechSearch/Se...Site+ID=EE+Tim es&queryText=IBOC&Search.x=14&Search.y=10&Search=S earch A search here reveals no revolutionary developments in the HD Radio/IBOC chip universe. Using the right search criteria ("digital radio")can lead you to this article. http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.j...SNDLPCK HSCJU NN2JVN?articleID=205205995 Note the reference to Samsung in the article. Which references the same few news releases I have already seen from earlier 2007, which promise future development. There are no press releases that state these promises have actually happened. There are no specification sheets, no application notes, no reference design examples, no number to call to get samples. These parts are vaporware. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Telamon | Shortwave | |||
Ping: Telamon | Shortwave | |||
Telamon please email me | Shortwave | |||
Ping Telamon | Shortwave | |||
Telamon | Shortwave |